On 4/27/17 4:15 AM, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Thursday, 16 February 2017 at 21:05:51 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
[ ... ]
Hi Guys,
As you already probably know some work has been done in the past week to
get an x86 jit rolling.
It is designed to produce very simple code with _any_ optimization at all.
On Thursday, 27 April 2017 at 08:51:17 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky
wrote:
On 4/27/17 4:15 AM, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Thursday, 16 February 2017 at 21:05:51 UTC, Stefan Koch
wrote:
[ ... ]
Hi Guys,
As you already probably know some work has been done in the
past week to
get an x86 jit rolling.
It
On 4/26/17 8:17 PM, Stanislav Blinov wrote:
On Wednesday, 26 April 2017 at 13:38:59 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
If you want to duplicate const data, but just shallow-copy mutable
data, you are correct in that you need two separate constructors, and
inout doesn't come into play.
That's t
On 4/24/17 1:43 AM, Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) wrote:
"Dashing, awesome, ultra-attractive programmer with an impeccably fine
taste in languages."
It's a bit long and doesn't include the letter D
FIFY
-Steve
On Wednesday, 12 April 2017 at 11:25:09 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
All review-related feedback on and discussion of the DIP should
occur in this thread. The review period will end at 11:59 PM ET
on April 26 (3:59 AM GMT), or when I make a post declaring it
complete.
The review period has ended
I was reading the ddmd code and 2 thoughts came to mind:
1. ddmd is much simpler than I imagined.
2. how has the front end not been integrated into the standard
library?
Is someone working on this? I had some ideas on how this could
be done.
On 27/04/2017 3:29 PM, Jonathan Marler wrote:
snip
2. how has the front end not been integrated into the standard library?
- It can't be compiled alone on some targets
- You can't reuse it in the same process
Ignoring the obvious that it isn't structured right for as a library.
It has a lon
This year, DConf has an extra day tacked on for problem solving
in the form of a hackathon. The intent is to work on issues
people find frustrating in the D ecosystem. While there will be
time given at the event for proposals, and those involving
third-party projects are welcome, it will help s
On 2017-04-27 16:29, Jonathan Marler wrote:
Is someone working on this? I had some ideas on how this could be done.
Yes [1] [2]. I think that there are more pull requests by the same
author. The lexer is already available as a Dub package [3], although
it's not regularly updated (or at all)
On Thursday, 27 April 2017 at 14:29:06 UTC, Jonathan Marler wrote:
I was reading the ddmd code and 2 thoughts came to mind:
1. ddmd is much simpler than I imagined.
2. how has the front end not been integrated into the standard
library?
Is someone working on this? I had some ideas on how thi
On Thursday, 27 April 2017 at 14:53:02 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
To help in compiling the list, what are some major issues from
the ecosystem that you'd like to see fixed?
* multi-threaded parsing in DMD
* https://github.com/dlang/dub/issues/838
* finishing std.experimental.xml
https://github.co
A few days ago i was reading this topic:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14165198
And the whole GC keeps coming up as a negative ( compared to Rust
).
From my understanding there has been a proposal DIP1000 to
address this issue. Is there any update on this topic?
Is it possible to ru
On Thursday, 27 April 2017 at 14:53:02 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
This year, DConf has an extra day tacked on for problem solving
in the form of a hackathon. The intent is to work on issues
people find frustrating in the D ecosystem. While there will be
time given at the event for proposals, and t
- More than one official package description language (json and
sdlang). I honestly don't care which it ends up being, but
please pick *one* (I am aware of the previous discussions on
the topic, but the current state of supporting both is just one
more point of friction for newcomers)
SDL sho
On Thursday, 27 April 2017 at 15:50:56 UTC, Ben wrote:
A few days ago i was reading this topic:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14165198
And the whole GC keeps coming up as a negative ( compared to
Rust ).
That's subjective, at best.
I see most of Rust's ownership mechanics in a negativ
On Thursday, 27 April 2017 at 16:33:02 UTC, singingbush wrote:
As far as I can tell the only reason dub defaults to sdl now
It did in the past, but hasn't done so for several minor versions
(it defaults to json).
On Thursday, 27 April 2017 at 14:53:02 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
This year, DConf has an extra day tacked on for problem solving
in the form of a hackathon. The intent is to work on issues
people find frustrating in the D ecosystem. While there will be
time given at the event for proposals, and t
On Thursday, 27 April 2017 at 15:50:56 UTC, Ben wrote:
A few days ago i was reading this topic:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14165198
And the whole GC keeps coming up as a negative ( compared to
Rust ).
From my understanding there has been a proposal DIP1000 to
address this issue. I
On Thursday, 27 April 2017 at 17:06:39 UTC, Andre Pany wrote:
Another big issue for me is using dub in a company. Big
companies do not want to use the official dub repository due to
security issues. They want to run their own dub repository with
dub packages they have done code checks. That m
The pending pull requests. In person is a great high-bandwidth way to
work through the massive backlog.
On 4/27/2017 7:53 AM, Mike Parker via Digitalmars-d wrote:
This year, DConf has an extra day tacked on for problem solving in the
form of a hackathon. The intent is to work on issues people
On 04/27/2017 04:53 PM, Mike Parker wrote:
This year, DConf has an extra day tacked on for problem solving in the
form of a hackathon. The intent is to work on issues people find
frustrating in the D ecosystem. While there will be time given at the
event for proposals, and those involving third-p
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 11:22:06AM -0700, Brad Roberts via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> The pending pull requests. In person is a great high-bandwidth way to
> work through the massive backlog.
+1. Phobos at one time was down to about 30-40 PRs, but now it has
clogged back up to around 100. We need to
On 4/12/17 12:34 PM, Mathias Lang wrote:
On Wednesday, 12 April 2017 at 16:22:00 UTC, Lewis wrote:
I have to ask the newbie question, just to make sure we're not missing
anything obvious. Why can't we fix invariants so that they're
pay-for-what-you-use? In other words, is there a way we can mak
On Thursday, 27 April 2017 at 16:35:57 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner wrote:
You'll have to be more specific about what issue you're
referring to. People not liking garbage collection? In any
case, AFAIU DIP1000 was about more mechanically verifiable
memory safety features when not using the GC.
Is i
On 27 April 2017 at 17:15, Jack Stouffer via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> * Docs which allow people to go back and see docs for previous versions.
> Huge headache when using GDC or LDC
>
Maybe you could submit a patch to add build hook to generate the
documentation for GDC. It would be a welcome contr
On Thursday, 27 April 2017 at 17:47:19 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner wrote:
On Thursday, 27 April 2017 at 17:06:39 UTC, Andre Pany wrote:
Another big issue for me is using dub in a company. Big
companies do not want to use the official dub repository due
to security issues. They want to run their own
https://github.com/dlang/phobos/pull/5355
Andrei
On Thursday, 27 April 2017 at 19:57:52 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
https://github.com/dlang/phobos/pull/5355
Andrei
And then we'd probably need INoGCAllocator and
ISharedNOGCAllocator...
On Thursday, 27 April 2017 at 19:36:44 UTC, Ben wrote:
Frankly seeing in this example that the GC was in theory able
to kick in 6 times in a simple 100 item loop, that is not
efficient. I if did my own memory management, the variable
cleanup will have been done in one go, right after the loop.
GC it´s not only about some performance issues that some people
may encounter on D, but it its a marketing problem as well.
"D is a systems programming language with..." GC(!?).
Most people that are interest in D came from c/c++ or other
backgrounds without GC or hearing their entire life that
On Thursday, 27 April 2017 at 19:36:44 UTC, Ben wrote:
On Thursday, 27 April 2017 at 16:35:57 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner
wrote:
You'll have to be more specific about what issue you're
referring to. People not liking garbage collection? In any
case, AFAIU DIP1000 was about more mechanically verifiable
On Thursday, 27 April 2017 at 19:55:44 UTC, Andre Pany wrote:
On Thursday, 27 April 2017 at 17:47:19 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner
wrote:
On Thursday, 27 April 2017 at 17:06:39 UTC, Andre Pany wrote:
Another big issue for me is using dub in a company. Big
companies do not want to use the official dub
On Thursday, 27 April 2017 at 20:04:32 UTC, Stanislav Blinov
wrote:
On Thursday, 27 April 2017 at 19:57:52 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
https://github.com/dlang/phobos/pull/5355
Andrei
And then we'd probably need INoGCAllocator and
ISharedNOGCAllocator...
Wasn't one major selling point
On Thursday, 27 April 2017 at 23:12:48 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner wrote:
On Thursday, 27 April 2017 at 20:04:32 UTC, Stanislav Blinov
wrote:
On Thursday, 27 April 2017 at 19:57:52 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
https://github.com/dlang/phobos/pull/5355
Andrei
And then we'd probably need INoGCAllo
On 04/27/2017 07:12 PM, Moritz Maxeiner wrote:
Wasn't one major selling point of compile time introspection / duck
typing that we could stop using interfaces such... naming schemes?
Not that I speak for everyone, but the way I see it, no, the duck typing
aspect is just something that's to be
On Thursday, 27 April 2017 at 19:36:44 UTC, Ben wrote:
Frankly seeing in this example that the GC was in theory able
to kick in 6 times in a simple 100 item loop, that is not
efficient. I if did my own memory management, the variable
cleanup will have been done in one go, right after the loop
On Thursday, 27 April 2017 at 14:53:02 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
To help in compiling the list, what are some major issues from
the ecosystem that you'd like to see fixed?
Backtraces with line information on macOS?
On Thursday, 27 April 2017 at 22:43:56 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner wrote:
Working on the memory chunk layer is memory management.
Working on the object layer is object lifetime management.
D offers you both automatic memory management and automatic
lifetime management via its GC.
D offers sound autom
On Thursday, 27 April 2017 at 19:36:44 UTC, Ben wrote:
Frankly seeing in this example that the GC was in theory able
to kick in 6 times in a simple 100 item loop, that is not
efficient. I if did my own memory management, the variable
cleanup will have been done in one go, right after the loop.
On Thursday, 27 April 2017 at 05:41:43 UTC, Daniel N wrote:
On Wednesday, 26 April 2017 at 18:34:48 UTC, Carl Sturtivant
wrote:
On Wednesday, 26 April 2017 at 15:00:30 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
I think you can appreciate that this doesn't scale. Imagine a
case which has 2 or 3 optional a
On Thursday, 27 April 2017 at 17:31:42 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
On Thursday, 27 April 2017 at 15:50:56 UTC, Ben wrote:
A few days ago i was reading this topic:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14165198
And the whole GC keeps coming up as a negative ( compared to
Rust ).
From my understandi
On Friday, 28 April 2017 at 04:44:44 UTC, Carl Sturtivant wrote:
On Thursday, 27 April 2017 at 05:41:43 UTC, Daniel N wrote:
On Wednesday, 26 April 2017 at 18:34:48 UTC, Carl Sturtivant
wrote:
On Wednesday, 26 April 2017 at 15:00:30 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
I think you can appreciate th
42 matches
Mail list logo
