It did not take long! Someone tried to create templatized open
methods and it didn't work right of the box. I expected that, but
in fact there may be a bit of hope. You cannot have virtual
function templates in C++ or in D because the layout of the
vtables have to be known at compile time - but
On Thursday, 21 September 2017 at 18:55:04 UTC, Vadim Lopatin
wrote:
On Thursday, 21 September 2017 at 18:49:00 UTC, bitwise wrote:
On Thursday, 21 September 2017 at 08:01:23 UTC, Vadim Lopatin
wrote:
[...]
Doesn't vibe-d use Fibers?
I tried to build a simple web server with a fiber-based
a
On Wednesday, 20 September 2017 at 16:34:36 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
On 09/20/2017 08:36 AM, jmh530 wrote:
On Wednesday, 20 September 2017 at 12:10:47 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
How would this be useful? -- Andrei
Really just an additional convenience, instead of writing
slice[0
On Thursday, 21 September 2017 at 08:01:23 UTC, Vadim Lopatin
wrote:
There is a simple set of simple web server apps written in
several languages (Go, Rust, Scala, Node-js):
https://github.com/nuald/simple-web-benchmark
I've sent PR to include D benchmark (vibe.d).
I was hoping it could show
On Thursday, 21 September 2017 at 18:49:00 UTC, bitwise wrote:
On Thursday, 21 September 2017 at 08:01:23 UTC, Vadim Lopatin
wrote:
There is a simple set of simple web server apps written in
several languages (Go, Rust, Scala, Node-js):
https://github.com/nuald/simple-web-benchmark
I've sent
On Thursday, 21 September 2017 at 17:13:16 UTC, Daniel Kozak
wrote:
Ok, maybe there is a some small improvments, but it is nothing
what would make this faster than rust and still undere 30K on
my pc
More test results:
On my Win10 PC, DMD/x86/libevent:27-29K, Go:31-33K
Ok, maybe there is a some small improvments, but it is nothing what would
make this faster than rust and still undere 30K on my pc
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 7:02 PM, Daniel Kozak wrote:
> in this situation I dont thing there will be difference
>
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 6:20 PM, Kagamin via Digit
in this situation I dont thing there will be difference
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 6:20 PM, Kagamin via Digitalmars-d <
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
> Other implementations use switch. https://dpaste.dzfl.pl/406dafbedbd9 is
> it slower?
>
Other implementations use switch.
https://dpaste.dzfl.pl/406dafbedbd9 is it slower?
with dmd 26K - 28K
witlh ldc 27K - 29K
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 3:53 PM, Vadim Lopatin via Digitalmars-d <
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
> On Thursday, 21 September 2017 at 13:46:49 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
>
>> Ok, after some more testing it seems it is almost sema with or without
>> VibeMa
On 21.09.2017 12:33, Per Nordlöw wrote:
On Wednesday, 20 September 2017 at 18:41:51 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
Can that be done without breakages? -- Andrei
No.
Are thinking about
typeof([1,2])
changing from
int[]
to
int[2]
?
Yes, and everything that entails, for example:
On Thursday, 21 September 2017 at 13:46:49 UTC, Daniel Kozak
wrote:
Ok, after some more testing it seems it is almost sema with or
without VibeManualMemoryManagement
Do you see any benefits from using LDC instead of DMD?
Ok, after some more testing it seems it is almost sema with or
without VibeManualMemoryManagement
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 3:44 PM, Daniel Kozak wrote:
> And it seems it is faster with GC. So removing VibeManualMemoryManagement
> helped in some cases too.
>
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Dani
s'/sema/same/
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 3:46 PM, Daniel Kozak wrote:
> Ok, after some more testing it seems it is almost sema with or without
> VibeManualMemoryManagement
>
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 3:44 PM, Daniel Kozak wrote:
>
>> And it seems it is faster with GC. So removing VibeManualMemoryM
And it seems it is faster with GC. So removing VibeManualMemoryManagement
helped in some cases too.
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Daniel Kozak wrote:
> BTW: I have changed dub.json a little too:
>
> {
> "name": "vibedtest",
> "targetName": "vibedtest",
> "targetType": "executable"
BTW: I have changed dub.json a little too:
{
"name": "vibedtest",
"targetName": "vibedtest",
"targetType": "executable",
"targetPath": "bin",
"dependencies": {
"vibe-d": "~>0.8.2-alpha.1"
},
"subConfigurations": {"vibe-d": "libevent"},
"versions": [
On Thursday, 21 September 2017 at 13:09:33 UTC, Daniel Kozak
wrote:
wrong version, this is my letest version:
https://paste.ofcode.org/qWsQikdhKiAywgBpKwANFR
Thank you!
Updated.
wrong version, this is my letest version:
https://paste.ofcode.org/qWsQikdhKiAywgBpKwANFR
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 3:01 PM, Daniel Kozak wrote:
> my version: https://paste.ofcode.org/RLX7GM6SHh3DjBBHd7wshj
>
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 2:50 PM, Sönke Ludwig via Digitalmars-d <
> digitalmars-d@purem
my version: https://paste.ofcode.org/RLX7GM6SHh3DjBBHd7wshj
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 2:50 PM, Sönke Ludwig via Digitalmars-d <
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
> Am 21.09.2017 um 14:41 schrieb Vadim Lopatin:
>
>> On Thursday, 21 September 2017 at 10:21:17 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
>>
>>> sh
my results:
OS lang:config req/scomments
=== ===== ==
Linuxgo24K
LinuxD:libevent27K4 threads
LinuxD:libasync 26.5K 4 threads
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 2:41 PM, Vadim Lopatin via Digitalmars-d <
digitalmars-d@pur
Am 21.09.2017 um 14:41 schrieb Vadim Lopatin:
On Thursday, 21 September 2017 at 10:21:17 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
shared static this()
{
(...)
}
BTW, I'd recommend using
void main()
{
(...)
runApplication();
}
instead and dropping the VibeD
On 9/20/17 1:33 PM, ag0aep6g wrote:
On 09/20/2017 06:55 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 9/20/17 11:48 AM, Dgame wrote:
[...]
Unqual!T[n] s(T, size_t n)(T[n] arr)
{
return arr;
}
auto a = "hallo".s;
writeln(typeof(a).stringof); // char[5]
[...]
Still it can't handle the cas
On Thursday, 21 September 2017 at 10:21:17 UTC, Sönke Ludwig
wrote:
shared static this()
{
(...)
}
BTW, I'd recommend using
void main()
{
(...)
runApplication();
}
instead and dropping the VibeDefaultMain version in the package
recipe. The
On Wednesday, 20 September 2017 at 18:41:51 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
Can that be done without breakages? -- Andrei
No.
Are thinking about
typeof([1,2])
changing from
int[]
to
int[2]
?
shared static this()
{
(...)
}
BTW, I'd recommend using
void main()
{
(...)
runApplication();
}
instead and dropping the VibeDefaultMain version in the package recipe.
The old approach is planned to be faded out slowly, because it requires
Am 21.09.2017 um 10:01 schrieb Vadim Lopatin:
There is a simple set of simple web server apps written in several
languages (Go, Rust, Scala, Node-js):
https://github.com/nuald/simple-web-benchmark
I've sent PR to include D benchmark (vibe.d).
I was hoping it could show performance at least no
On Thursday, 21 September 2017 at 08:18:51 UTC, Suliman wrote:
Can it be issue with regex speed?
auto reg = ctRegex!"^/greeting/([a-z]+)$";
Did you try without it?
Regex is used for request paths like "/greeting/username" and not
used for path "/"
There is no big slowdown caused by regex.
4
Can it be issue with regex speed?
auto reg = ctRegex!"^/greeting/([a-z]+)$";
Did you try without it?
There is a simple set of simple web server apps written in
several languages (Go, Rust, Scala, Node-js):
https://github.com/nuald/simple-web-benchmark
I've sent PR to include D benchmark (vibe.d).
I was hoping it could show performance at least not worse than
other languages.
But it appears
29 matches
Mail list logo
