On Friday, 15 December 2017 at 21:34:48 UTC, Neia Neutuladh wrote:
On Wednesday, 13 December 2017 at 03:15:11 UTC, IM wrote:
https://code.dlang.org/packages/libdtasks
I'd get rid of the ITaskRunner interface and rename
AbstractTaskRunner to TaskRunner. Interfaces are fine when you
need them,
namespace Ethplorer \ UnitTest ;
ใช้ ข้อยกเว้น ;
ใช้ PHPUnit_Framework_TestCase ;
/ **
* ทดสอบ Ethplorer API
* /
class Api_Test ขยาย PHPUnit_Framework_TestCase {
protected $ url = ' https://api.ethplorer.io/ ' ;
/ **
* @return void
* /
การ ตั้งค่าฟังก์ชัน สาธารณะ ()
On Friday, 15 December 2017 at 21:25:52 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 08:40:17PM +, John Gabriele via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
Not sure where to mention this, but it appears that the wiki's
down (for me at least). I can ping it, but it won't come up in
my browser.
Down for me
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 08:40:17PM +, John Gabriele via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> Not sure where to mention this, but it appears that the wiki's down
> (for me at least). I can ping it, but it won't come up in my browser.
Down for me too. It comes up with a message saying they're experiencing
tec
On Wednesday, 13 December 2017 at 03:15:11 UTC, IM wrote:
https://code.dlang.org/packages/libdtasks
I'd get rid of the ITaskRunner interface and rename
AbstractTaskRunner to TaskRunner. Interfaces are fine when you
need them, but you rarely need them. You can just make
PostTaskAndReply non-f
Not sure where to mention this, but it appears that the wiki's
down (for me at least). I can ping it, but it won't come up in my
browser.
Following the discussion at
https://github.com/dlang/phobos/pull/5916, we realized that
there's quite some overhead in importing some Phobos modules.
Ideally importing a Phobos module without using it, should be
cost-free (i.e. pay for what you use).
Test case: consider a file with `import st
On Friday, 15 December 2017 at 12:56:41 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Friday, December 15, 2017 11:10:42 Dgame via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
On Friday, 15 December 2017 at 09:18:23 UTC, Seb wrote:
> On Thursday, 14 December 2017 at 16:40:33 UTC, Petar Kirov
>
> [ZombineDev] wrote:
>> ```
>> scope f
On Friday, 15 December 2017 at 12:56:41 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Friday, December 15, 2017 11:10:42 Dgame via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
On Friday, 15 December 2017 at 09:18:23 UTC, Seb wrote:
> [...]
Since scope was revived with DIP-1000 we will see about that.
I doubt that the deprecation wi
On Friday, December 15, 2017 11:10:42 Dgame via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Friday, 15 December 2017 at 09:18:23 UTC, Seb wrote:
> > On Thursday, 14 December 2017 at 16:40:33 UTC, Petar Kirov
> >
> > [ZombineDev] wrote:
> >> ```
> >> scope foo = new Foo();
> >> ```
> >
> > That's about to be deprecat
On Friday, 15 December 2017 at 09:18:23 UTC, Seb wrote:
On Thursday, 14 December 2017 at 16:40:33 UTC, Petar Kirov
[ZombineDev] wrote:
```
scope foo = new Foo();
```
That's about to be deprecated in favor of scoped!Foo:
https://dlang.org/deprecate.html#scope%20for%20allocating%20classes%20on
On Thursday, 14 December 2017 at 16:40:33 UTC, Petar Kirov
[ZombineDev] wrote:
On Thursday, 14 December 2017 at 16:10:17 UTC, Jonathan Marler
wrote:
On Thursday, 14 December 2017 at 14:45:51 UTC, Dgame wrote:
Strongly reminds me of scoped
Declaring a variable as `scoped` prevents that variabl
Fuckur shitty language hahahahahahahahahaha pisslords!
No D submissions for ACCU this year. :-(
--
Russel.
==
Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200
41 Buckmaster Roadm: +44 7770 465 077
London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Thursday, 14 December 2017 at 16:40:33 UTC, Petar Kirov
[ZombineDev] wrote:
```
scope foo = new Foo();
```
That's about to be deprecated in favor of scoped!Foo:
https://dlang.org/deprecate.html#scope%20for%20allocating%20classes%20on%20the%20stack
On 15/12/2017 8:15 AM, IM wrote:
I'm still looking for feedback about these points:
- Any candidate class that can be better switched to a struct or even
a template?
Template(d/s) symbols are only useful for making things more generic for
the purpose of code reuse.
Next it comes to two
I'm still looking for feedback about these points:
- Any candidate class that can be better switched to a struct
or even a template?
- The use of shared and __gshared, did I get those right? I
find the TLS concept unpleasant, because it makes me unsure
what's the right thing to do. For exa
I'm going to do a writeup on the state of D in Web Development,
APIs and Services for 2017. I need the perspective of the
community too along with my personal experience. Please help out.
More details the better.
0. Since when did you or company start using D in this area?
1. Do you use a fra
On Thursday, 14 December 2017 at 12:51:07 UTC, rjframe wrote:
On Wed, 13 Dec 2017 03:15:11 +, IM wrote:
[...]
I like this API design.
I would separate each unit test to its own `unittest` block
(you have three tests in a single block in
`SingleThreadTaskRunner.d`); it doesn't really m
19 matches
Mail list logo
