On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 07:26:54PM -0700, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 02, 2018 17:51:01 H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> > object.destroy! :-P
>
> But that doesn't work during compile-time, does it? ;)
[...]
Which compile-time? :-D
T
--
Computers aren
On Tuesday, 2 January 2018 at 22:08:52 UTC, aerto wrote:
Hello and happy new year im new in d so i have a question
i have into a txt file named users.txt the bellow
["admin":"123456789"]
["test":"test345"]
im my app
string[string] data;
so i need to load users.txt content into data in order
On Tuesday, 2 January 2018 at 23:25:21 UTC, visitor wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 January 2018 at 22:08:52 UTC, aerto wrote:
Hello and happy new year im new in d so i have a question
writeln(data["admin"]); // i want this to print 123456789
writeln(data["test"]); // i want this to print test345
if you
On Tuesday, January 02, 2018 17:51:01 H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> object.destroy! :-P
But that doesn't work during compile-time, does it? ;)
- Jonathan M Davis
Finally got around to working on my draft article "Compile-time vs.
compile-time" again today. Mainly added another case study for a
commonly encountered issue, and cleaned up the outdated stuff on
"static" foreach (not the *real* static foreach that we have now). Now
I'm reasonably happy with its
On 01/02/2018 10:13 AM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> As you can see, I made File into a template parameter so that the
> unittest can simulate a virtual filesystem with a struct
All I'm hearing is "blah blah blog." ;)
Ali
On 1/2/2018 1:50 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 09:50:55PM +, Dennis via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 January 2018 at 21:00:34 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Just sent it there, too.
Thank you! I recieved it there (albeit in the spam folder). Still weird I
didn't recieve a
Hello and happy new year im new in d so i have a question
i have into a txt file named users.txt the bellow
["admin":"123456789"]
["test":"test345"]
im my app
string[string] data;
so i need to load users.txt content into data in order to be able
to run
writeln(data["admin"]); // i want t
On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 09:50:55PM +, Dennis via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Tuesday, 2 January 2018 at 21:00:34 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> > Just sent it there, too.
>
> Thank you! I recieved it there (albeit in the spam folder). Still weird I
> didn't recieve anything on my Gmail account.
Gm
On Tuesday, 2 January 2018 at 21:00:34 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Just sent it there, too.
Thank you! I recieved it there (albeit in the spam folder). Still
weird I didn't recieve anything on my Gmail account.
On Tuesday, 2 January 2018 at 17:16:54 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
I would actually recommend ddocing each of the overloads of
destroy individually instead of lumping them together,
identifying what happens with each one.
I first wrote an extra one for just structs, but then decided to
On 1/2/2018 1:44 AM, Dennis wrote:
On Monday, 1 January 2018 at 22:21:28 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
If you still do not receive it, please let me know and maybe you have another
email address you can use.
Mmm... I still can't find it in my inbox and I've looked in the spam folder.
Another e-mail
On Tuesday, 2 January 2018 at 20:07:11 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
What's the monitor do? I see that in the ABI documentation, but
it doesn't really explain it...
A monitor queues/schedules processes that are calling methods of
an object so that only one process is executing methods on a
single object
On 1/2/18 3:07 PM, jmh530 wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 January 2018 at 17:16:54 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
It does something different depending on the type:
Objects: calls rt_finalize on the object, which calls the dtor,
deletes the monitor, rewrites the init value to the object, and THEN
zer
On Tuesday, 2 January 2018 at 17:16:54 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
It does something different depending on the type:
Objects: calls rt_finalize on the object, which calls the dtor,
deletes the monitor, rewrites the init value to the object, and
THEN zeroes the vtable ptr. This last step
On Tuesday, 2 January 2018 at 16:34:25 UTC, Ali wrote:
"Overall it could be said that D has the downsides of GC but
doesn't enjoy its benefits."
Not a true statement. Go does not have long pauses, but it has
slightly slower code and a penalty for interfacing with C. Go
also has finalization
On Tuesday, 2 January 2018 at 16:34:25 UTC, Ali wrote:
While randomly browsing online, I found this link below
https://www.quora.com/Which-language-has-the-brightest-future-in-replacement-of-C-between-D-Go-and-Rust-And-Why/answer/Andrei-Alexandrescu
[...]
Yes, it is a great post. I would be h
On Thursday, 14 December 2017 at 08:00:44 UTC, Petar Kirov
[ZombineDev] wrote:
If you mean process shared memory, I agree that there are many
valid cases where you want to be in control of the memory. I
have been thinking about extracting the core of the
synchronization primitives into @system
On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 04:00:11PM +, Atila Neves via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Saturday, 30 December 2017 at 01:09:59 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
[...]
> > Yeah... recently I've been resorting to `dmd -unittest -main
> > module.d` on single modules for faster turnaround time, because in
> > spite o
On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 09:57:08AM +, Patrick Schluter via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On Monday, 1 January 2018 at 18:32:37 UTC, Pjotr Prins wrote:
[...]
> > I am just going to share my thoughts a little. Github, in my
> > opinion, is hype and even though I depend on it today, I am trying
> > to d
While randomly browsing online, I found this link below
https://www.quora.com/Which-language-has-the-brightest-future-in-replacement-of-C-between-D-Go-and-Rust-And-Why/answer/Andrei-Alexandrescu
This is a post on Quora, with some interesting statements by
Andrei himself
"Overall it could be s
On Saturday, 30 December 2017 at 01:09:59 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 05:52:36PM -0700, Jonathan M Davis via
Digitalmars-d wrote: [...]
[...]
[...]
Yeah... recently I've been resorting to `dmd -unittest -main
module.d` on single modules for faster turnaround time, because
On Wednesday, 29 November 2017 at 14:23:30 UTC, Michael V.
Franklin wrote:
On Tuesday, 28 November 2017 at 19:38:44 UTC, Meta wrote:
I'd be interested in working on a DIP like this Michael, but I
also want to expand the scope to allowing UDAs on function
arguments as well. We should have some
On Tuesday, 2 January 2018 at 15:13:46 UTC, Mike Franklin wrote:
[..]
I suggest the following:
Calls `obj`'s destructor and sets `obj` to its default initial
state, `T.init`. This function does not initiate a GC cycle
nor does it free any GC memory.
Mike
+1
On Tuesday, 2 January 2018 at 13:58:49 UTC, Johan Engelen wrote:
How about:
"Destroys the given object `obj` and puts `obj` in its `T.init`
state. This function used to destroy an object such that any
cleanup by the destructor or finalizer is done, and such that
`obj` no longer references any
On Tuesday, 2 January 2018 at 14:39:52 UTC, Johan Engelen wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 January 2018 at 14:22:06 UTC, Temtaime wrote:
Why not zerofy the object ?
Please keep the discussion on the topic of documentation,
thanks.
-Johan
Documentation does not correspond with the actual behavior, so
On Tuesday, 2 January 2018 at 14:22:06 UTC, Temtaime wrote:
Why not zerofy the object ?
Please keep the discussion on the topic of documentation, thanks.
-Johan
On Tuesday, 2 January 2018 at 04:43:42 UTC, codephantom wrote:
Well, consider the silent 'minority' too, who still think that
increasing performance, and reducing demands on resources,
still matter, a lot, and that we shouldn't just surrender this
just to make programmers more 'productive' (i.e
On Monday, 1 January 2018 at 18:32:37 UTC, Pjotr Prins wrote:
On Monday, 1 January 2018 at 02:02:03 UTC, rjframe wrote:
That's probably not the best method of effecting change.
It killed off the discussion nicely, indeed.
I am just going to share my thoughts a little. Github, in my
opinion,
On Monday, 1 January 2018 at 22:21:28 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
If you still do not receive it, please let me know and maybe
you have another email address you can use.
Mmm... I still can't find it in my inbox and I've looked in the
spam folder. Another e-mail address of mine is `dkor...@live.nl
30 matches
Mail list logo
