this is very related to ICF (identical code folding), which some linkers do.
in summary: gold and lld have options to do that, and it can be unsafe
to do if code relies on each function having distinct address;
> gold's --icf=safe option only enables ICF for functions that can be proven
> not to
If anyone is interested in the type of work that goes on in my
group at eBay, take a look at this blog post by one of my
colleagues:
https://www.ebayinc.com/stories/blogs/tech/making-e-commerce-search-faster/
It describes a 25% efficiency gain via a technique called index
reordering. This is
On Thursday, 18 January 2018 at 09:15:04 UTC, Simen Kjærås wrote:
At any rate, this is a topic for a DIP.
So, a few more thoughts on this:
Arrays and pointers automatically decay to their Unqual'ed
variants when passed to a templated function. AAs do not, which
makes sense given their refere
On Saturday, 29 July 2017 at 10:21:32 UTC, Johan Engelen wrote:
Hi all,
Are there any robot folks out here
here i am :)
that are working with ROS
i made things like CNC-Milling machine, wheat mill with
controller board, and ...
but i didn't done such a complex project that i need to use
On 1/19/18 2:48 PM, 12345swordy wrote:
I see, this does look like it needs a DIP in order to fix this. How the
progress of the calls being replaced by templates by Andrei and company?
Here are the improvements that Lucia is doing/has done, which is a lot
of good stuff:
https://github.com/dla
On Friday, 19 January 2018 at 17:01:50 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
On Friday, 19 January 2018 at 16:18:15 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
this problem can't be fixed.
You need to specify, do you mean this can't be fixed without a
DIP or even with a DIP?
I meant: at all. But i'd like to be wrong.
On Friday, 19 January 2018 at 18:22:33 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 1/19/18 10:56 AM, 12345swordy wrote:
I can't find any documentation nor can I find any information
regarding it's implementation. I am asking this, as I focusing
on fixing bugs that destroy currently has, most noticeably
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 06:42:26PM +, Dmitry Olshansky via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
[...]
> Also forgot to mention that can pass BitPacked!(ubyte,2) to Trie
> template as value type to use 2 bit per value. Should reduce your
> width table 4-fold. Just saying;)
Thanks for the tip! Indeed, the ta
On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 07:18:22PM +, Luís Marques via Digitalmars-d wrote:
[...]
> void combulate(T)(T* item)
> {
> // ... lots of code here
> item.next = ...;
> }
[...]
[...]
> This catches the bug, but will have the disadvantage of generating
> code for the variou
On Friday, 19 January 2018 at 19:18:22 UTC, Luís Marques wrote:
So far this seems to be working well for me. Do you have
experience writing this kind of code? Do you have any advice
that might be relevant to this situation?
This is actually the way a lot of stuff is implemented in d
runtime c
Consider some C code like this:
struct Foo
{
struct Foo *next;
int bar;
};
struct Bar
{
struct Bar *next;
char* name;
};
struct Unrelated
{
int x;
int y;
};
void combulate(void *item)
{
struct I
On 01/19/2018 02:14 AM, yawniek wrote:
> Just look how
> beautiful Golangs protocol implementations are and the whole ecosystem
> that focused effort spawned.
I agree and do have first-hand experience with that but I'm not
experienced enough in this field to come up with a modern solution. If
On 1/19/18 10:56 AM, 12345swordy wrote:
I can't find any documentation nor can I find any information regarding
it's implementation. I am asking this, as I focusing on fixing bugs that
destroy currently has, most noticeably bugs regarding attributes. I am
not sure that this requires a DIP in or
On Friday, 19 January 2018 at 16:18:15 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
this problem can't be fixed.
You need to specify, do you mean this can't be fixed without a
DIP or even with a DIP?
On Friday, 19 January 2018 at 15:56:58 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
I can't find any documentation nor can I find any information
regarding it's implementation. I am asking this, as I focusing
on fixing bugs that destroy currently has, most noticeably bugs
regarding attributes. I am not sure that th
On Friday, 19 January 2018 at 15:56:58 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
I can't find any documentation nor can I find any information
regarding it's implementation. I am asking this, as I focusing
on fixing bugs that destroy currently has, most noticeably bugs
regarding attributes. I am not sure that th
On Friday, 19 January 2018 at 06:53:16 UTC, Rel wrote:
As far as I understand I will need a C toolchain that
allows cross-compilation to target OS in order to build
runtime libraries, is it correct?
If you're going to compile the compiler, LLVM is written in C++,
so you would have the C toolch
I can't find any documentation nor can I find any information
regarding it's implementation. I am asking this, as I focusing on
fixing bugs that destroy currently has, most noticeably bugs
regarding attributes. I am not sure that this requires a DIP in
order to fix this.
https://issues.dlang.
On Friday, 19 January 2018 at 08:08:42 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Friday, January 19, 2018 06:53:16 Rel via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
On Wednesday, 17 January 2018 at 12:31:35 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
> https://wiki.dlang.org/Build_D_for_Android
> https://wiki.dlang.org/Building_LDC_runtime_librarie
Hi folks,
I am trying to recognize point clouds, like people, cars,
vans. I already have them separated into clusters.
I have tried PCL recognition tutorials but are not giving me good
results,it relies too much in correspondence grouping. is there
some kind of neural network with point
On 19/01/2018 8:08 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Friday, January 19, 2018 06:53:16 Rel via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Wednesday, 17 January 2018 at 12:31:35 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
https://wiki.dlang.org/Build_D_for_Android
https://wiki.dlang.org/Building_LDC_runtime_libraries
https://github.com/ldc-
On Friday, 19 January 2018 at 08:51:00 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
Not sure I understand this feature. Is it something like:
auto foo = 3;
auto bar = 4;
log(foo, bar);
Would print?
main.d:3 foo=3
main.d:3 bar=4
If that's the case then this seems like yet another hack
because we don't have AST
> Not sure I understand this feature. Is it something like:
>
> auto foo = 3;
> auto bar = 4;
> log(foo, bar);
>
> Would print?
>
> main.d:3 foo=3
> main.d:3 bar=4
main.d:3 foo=3, bar=4 (or whatever formatting is applied given
supplied stringiified arguments, that's irrelevant as it can be
customi
On Monday, 15 January 2018 at 19:28:08 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
I know a project where D could benefit from gRPC in D, which is
not among the supported languages:
https://grpc.io/docs/
Do you think gRPC support is worth adding to GSOC 2018 ideas?
https://wiki.dlang.org/GSOC_2018_Ideas
Ali
On 2018-01-19 07:53, Rel wrote:
I'd like to cross-compile from Windows machine to Linux and
Mac OSX. Where can I get C toolchain that will allow me to
cross-compile D's runtime libraries from Windows to Linux
and Mac OSX?
Here's a Dockerfile that cross-compiles to macOS:
https://github.com/ja
On 2018-01-18 00:13, Timothee Cour wrote:
I wrote something like that to mimic C's `#arg` preprocessor
(stringify argument) for debugging functions, eg:
```
// simplified here:
void log(string file=__FILE__, int line=__LINE__, T) (T a){
enum arg_stringified=import(file)[line]; // more comple
On Friday, January 19, 2018 06:53:16 Rel via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Wednesday, 17 January 2018 at 12:31:35 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
> > https://wiki.dlang.org/Build_D_for_Android
> > https://wiki.dlang.org/Building_LDC_runtime_libraries
> > https://github.com/ldc-developers/ldc/pull/2142#issuecomment
27 matches
Mail list logo
