On Thursday, 9 August 2018 at 15:56:31 UTC, w0rp wrote:
On Thursday, 9 August 2018 at 10:37:36 UTC, Andrea Fontana
wrote:
On Thursday, 9 August 2018 at 04:10:47 UTC, Nicholas Wilson
wrote:
The DIP makes the claim that:
* "[@noreturn] has the awkward result of a function
specifying it has a re
On Thursday, 9 August 2018 at 22:56:02 UTC, tide wrote:
Yah that's what I was getting. You should possibly find another
way other than symbolic links. I don't think you'll get access
to admin rights unless you restart VS Code with them.
No, I certainly don't need VSCode to be launched with adm
On Thursday, 9 August 2018 at 13:02:47 UTC, Laurent Tréguier
wrote:
On Thursday, 9 August 2018 at 12:42:45 UTC, Domain wrote:
I just give it a try in visual studio code, but I got errors:
[Error - 20:39:54] Starting client failed
Error: Unsupported server configuration {
"command": ""
}
at
On 09.08.2018 05:02, Mike Parker wrote:
This is the feedback thread for the first round of Community Review for
DIP 1017, "Add Bottom Type":
https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/8274b0f600075e4553b41c31f4b77be2d917bb40/DIPs/DIP1017.md
All review-related feedback on and discussion of the DIP s
On Wednesday, 8 August 2018 at 21:01:18 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
Not trying to give too much away about the library I'm writing,
but the problem I'm trying to solve is parsing out tokens from
a buffer. I want to delineate the whole, as well as the parts,
but it's difficult to get back t
On Thursday, 9 August 2018 at 12:42:45 UTC, Domain wrote:
I just give it a try in visual studio code, but I got errors:
[Error - 20:39:54] Starting client failed
Error: Unsupported server configuration {
"command": ""
}
at _getServerWorkingDir.then.serverWorkingDir
(C:\Users\Domain-Work\.v
On Thursday, 9 August 2018 at 10:37:36 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
On Thursday, 9 August 2018 at 04:10:47 UTC, Nicholas Wilson
wrote:
The DIP makes the claim that:
* "[@noreturn] has the awkward result of a function
specifying it has a return type T, but never returns that
type". When it is de
A better name for this type is `never`, which is the name of the
TypeScript type with similar semantics.
https://www.typescriptlang.org/docs/handbook/basic-types.html#never `nothing` is also a decent name, used in some other languages, but `never` makes it more obvious that a function never retur
On Thursday, 9 August 2018 at 13:45:54 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
I hope there is a better name than Tbottom. A name like that
is not consistent with the rest of the language. Why not
Bottom?
according to the DIP, the name can be chosen arbitrarily as the
type is retrieved via matching the type
On Thursday, 9 August 2018 at 13:56:05 UTC, Gary Willoughby wrote:
perhaps this should actually be an attribute `@bottom`, or more
a documenting: `@noreturn`?
Yes, it should.
On Thursday, 9 August 2018 at 10:47:37 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
There is no explanation of when the additional optimizations
would be actually relevant,
Usually functions that don't return abort the program anyway.
Maybe total code size.
OT: as for microoptimizations, what bugged me is a patte
On Thursday, 9 August 2018 at 13:50:00 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Thursday, 9 August 2018 at 13:30:38 UTC, Yuxuan Shui wrote:
I searched around, and there seems to be no way to specify
alignment on symbol, so I don't think the linker is in the
wrong here.
The alignment should be specified for sec
On Thursday, 9 August 2018 at 13:42:57 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
On Thursday, 9 August 2018 at 03:02:55 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
This is the feedback thread for the first round of Community
Review for DIP 1017, "Add Bottom Type":
I hope there is a better name than Tbottom. A name like that is
not
On Thursday, 9 August 2018 at 13:30:38 UTC, Yuxuan Shui wrote:
I searched around, and there seems to be no way to specify
alignment on symbol, so I don't think the linker is in the
wrong here.
The alignment should be specified for section.
On Thursday, 9 August 2018 at 13:42:57 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
On Thursday, 9 August 2018 at 03:02:55 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
This is the feedback thread for the first round of Community
Review for DIP 1017, "Add Bottom Type":
I hope there is a better name than Tbottom. A name like that is
not
On Thursday, 9 August 2018 at 03:02:55 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
This is the feedback thread for the first round of Community
Review for DIP 1017, "Add Bottom Type":
I hope there is a better name than Tbottom. A name like that is
not consistent with the rest of the language. Why not Bottom?
Clarifications:
On Thursday, 9 August 2018 at 13:30:38 UTC, Yuxuan Shui wrote:
I'm trying to build LDC with dmd and Musl, but the result ldc
will always crash. I track that down to an unalignment SIMD
access to a global variable. Apparently C++ compiler thinks the
variable should be aligned to
I'm trying to build LDC with dmd and Musl, but the result ldc
will always crash. I track that down to an unalignment SIMD
access to a global variable. Apparently C++ compiler thinks the
variable should be aligned to 16 bytes, but it's only aligned to
8 bytes.
After some more digging, I find o
On Thursday, 9 August 2018 at 12:42:45 UTC, Domain wrote:
I just give it a try in visual studio code, but I got errors:
[Error - 20:39:54] Starting client failed
Error: Unsupported server configuration {
"command": ""
}
at _getServerWorkingDir.then.serverWorkingDir
(C:\Users\Domain-Work\.v
On Thursday, 9 August 2018 at 03:02:55 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
This is the feedback thread for the first round of Community
Review for DIP 1017, "Add Bottom Type":
[...]
How does this DIP interact with constructors and deconstructors
as they are glorified void functions?
-Alexander
On Thursday, 9 August 2018 at 11:48:55 UTC, Laurent Tréguier
wrote:
On Thursday, 9 August 2018 at 10:37:32 UTC, IM wrote:
I've always had issues with Code-d! I filed several issues on
its GitHub repo, but my experience with the Code-d author was
that those issues are likely to remain open and u
On Thursday, 9 August 2018 at 10:37:32 UTC, IM wrote:
I've always had issues with Code-d! I filed several issues on
its GitHub repo, but my experience with the Code-d author was
that those issues are likely to remain open and unaddressed.
Since he is a student (or at least he was some time ago
On Thursday, 9 August 2018 at 10:47:37 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
Regarding the rationale:
It should be pointed out that this is a further complication of
the type-system (which is already more complex than what c++
has).
That does impact generic code.
My own experience with generic code has sh
On Thursday, 9 August 2018 at 03:02:55 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
This is the feedback thread for the first round of Community
Review for DIP 1017, "Add Bottom Type":
[ ... ]
Regarding the rationale:
It should be pointed out that this is a further complication of
the type-system (which is alre
On Thursday, 9 August 2018 at 04:16:45 UTC, Uknown wrote:
I would like to point out that C++ does this with attributes
instead[0]. If this was an attribute instead (like
`@noreturn`), it would simplify interfacing with C++. It would
also avoid the breaking change.
[0]: eel.is/c++draft/DCL.att
On Thursday, 9 August 2018 at 04:10:47 UTC, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
The DIP makes the claim that:
* "[@noreturn] has the awkward result of a function specifying
it has a return type T, but never returns that type". When it
is deliberate (such as annotating a fatal error function) the
is almost
On Wednesday, 8 August 2018 at 20:56:51 UTC, tide wrote:
On Wednesday, 8 August 2018 at 07:57:49 UTC, Laurent Tréguier
wrote:
[...]
Code-d overcomplicates things I find though. I can't even build
it, there's so many dependencies attached to it that it isn't
worth looking through to even find
On Wednesday, 8 August 2018 at 07:25:57 UTC, Tab wrote:
I find DLS [1] to be very stable, updated more often [2], and
it just works without issues (vs. Code-d) ~~ at least for me.
I think we should give it a chance.
I agree.
I created a long list of features [3] I'd like to see in D IDE.
Ho
On Wednesday, 8 August 2018 at 20:56:51 UTC, tide wrote:
DLS took no time at all to build, nice and simple.
The only thing built is a small bootstrap program that downloads
a prebuilt binary release, that's why it's fast. Before v0.5.0,
DLS was always compiled, and that took some time, as wel
29 matches
Mail list logo
