>
> Thoughts?
I really, really like the idea.
On Sat, 23 Oct 2010 16:09:37 +0100, Peter Alexander wrote:
> Should people work on other D compilers (gdc and ldc in particular)? Is
> this even possible without a formal language specification?
God, I hope so, because I've already sunk enough time into SDC. I'd like
to have a usable compiler at
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 16:26:52 -0500, Sean Kelly wrote:
> Also, I do still feel
> that the druntime SVN shouldn't have to be the repository used for every
> compiler runtime or garbage collector implementation.
I am attempting to write a compiler in D2 (github.com/bhelyer/SDC), and I
can't help but
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 19:58:42 +, %u wrote:
> == Quote from Denis Koroskin (2kor...@gmail.com)'s article
>> On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 22:19:12 +0300, Walter Bright
>> wrote:
>> > Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
>> >> My recommendation -- when you are ready, switch wholly to D2. Don't
>> >> bother with c
I vote yes.
Why? Because Phobos has needed a solid module for working with dates and
time for a long time, and neither std.date or std.gregorian filled that
need -- std.date is buggy beyond repair, and std.gregorian's API doesn't
make my normal tasks easy. std.datetime's API is fairly intuitive
On Thu, 09 Dec 2010 20:54:14 -0800, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> In any case, you've found bugs, please point them out. I can't fix it if
> I don't know that it's broken.
The localtime it retrieves is incorrect, over here. It is always one and
a half hours slow. I am retrieving it using Clock.currTi
If I do
if (object) {
...
}
What happens is fairly obvious, and is equivalent to
if (object !is null) {
}
However, if I do
auto object = new Object();
assert(object);
What I expect to happen is
assert(object !is null);
Just as in the above example. What h
A few corrections.
On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 12:02:57 +, Bernard Helyer wrote:
> auto object = new Object();
> assert(object);
This segfaults if object is null, which is obviously impossible in this
example.
>
> FWIW, GDC doesn't do the rewrite,
On structs, it do
Further correction.
On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 12:09:41 +, Bernard Helyer wrote:
>> FWIW, GDC doesn't do the rewrite,
>
> On structs, it does the rewrite on class instances (boo!).
It checks for null then checks the invariant.
I think that's a good compromise, given tha
I like it. D's web presence needs work all-round.
Here's SDC, just for kicks:
[SDC]$ find src/sdc -name "*.d" -print0 | xargs --null wc -l | sort -rn |
head -n 1
12545 total
[SDC]$ find src/sdc -name "*.d" -print0 | xargs --null grep '.\{81,\}' |
cut -f1 -d:| uniq -c | sort -nr
81 src/sdc/gen/value.d
44 src/sdc/gen/expression.d
On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 17:33:42 -0600, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>
> Should we nuke it?
>From orbit; it's the only way to be sure.
Remove it with utter prejudice, before someone else makes the mistake of
trying to use it.
On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 16:28:27 -0800, Brad Roberts wrote:
> I haven't used it nor am likely to,
> but I also have trouble ruling out the potential that there's users for
> which it works and they just aren't talking about it here.
I do not believe that it's possible that anyone has used std.xml
su
On Friday, 21 September 2012 at 10:04:00 UTC, Jens Mueller wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I've met Matt Goldbolt, the author of the GCC Explorer at
http://gcc.godbolt.org - a very handy online disassembler for
GCC.
This is not a disassembler. It just stops compilation before the
assembler
I just found a bug in my code that showed up in this fragment:
match(ts, TokenType.OpenParen);
ie.type == parseType(ts);
Obviously I meant
ie.type = parseType(ts);
but wrote == because I'm an idiot. If parseType wasn't a function
with side effects, -w would have flagged it as an ex
I tried to post this last night, but the NG wasn't having any of
it.
I found myself writing a bug that looked like this
match(ts, TokenType.Is);
match(ts, TokenType.OpenParen);
isExp.type == parseType(ts);
The bug being of course, that a type is parsed and ts is modified,
so the ex
On Tuesday, 25 September 2012 at 19:29:26 UTC, Bernard Helyer
wrote:
I tried to post this last night, but the NG wasn't having any
of it.
I found myself writing a bug that looked like this
match(ts, TokenType.Is);
match(ts, TokenType.OpenParen);
isExp.type == parseType(ts);
On Tuesday, 25 September 2012 at 21:15:24 UTC, bearophile wrote:
The top level operation is the ==, that is a pure expression,
so maybe dmd should warn on this.
Yeah, I thought so but I'm not sure. Hence me asking.
On Friday, 28 September 2012 at 02:12:20 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic
wrote:
This is a very specific situation that could be handled unless
it is
too complex to mess with the lexer. If there's an if statement
which
isn't followed by a block but is followed by a blank line emit a
warning. Sounds simple
On Saturday, 29 September 2012 at 05:08:12 UTC, Tommi wrote:
then that's completely an unacceptable argument. The question
of how much work it is to implement, has nothing to do with
whether it's a good feature to have or not. And that's what
we're discussing.
Except a theoretical feature doe
Yeah, to respond to the larger topic, the with statement
is more than enough here. I'm not convinced that complicating
lookup rules further is worth it.
On Monday, 1 October 2012 at 12:54:45 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
I have a Google alert on "D programming language" and it
sometimes yields pages like this:
http://swpp.co.uk/lovegovee.php?lib=1612
It looks like random sentences either scraped from other sites
or generated using a languag
Our results from 14 Java applications
Only 14? So it's a useless statistic. Good to know.
The rest seemed interesting.
On Thursday, 4 October 2012 at 03:10:56 UTC, Alex Rønne Petersen
wrote:
Look, not to sound dismissive, but D3 is not a thing and likely
will never be.
Well _I'll_ be dismissive. This idea, even if we were doing
the D3 thing, is completely pointless. D != maths. I don't
know why I have to point
On Tuesday, 2 October 2012 at 15:14:10 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
First, I think zero-terminated strings shouldn't be needed
frequently enough in D code to make this necessary.
My experience has been much different. Interfacing with C occurs
in nearly every D program I write, and I usually
On Tuesday, 2 October 2012 at 14:03:36 UTC, monarch_dodra wrote:
If you want 0 termination, then make it explicit, that's my
opinion.
That ship has long since sailed. You'll break code in an
incredibly dangerous way if you were to change it now.
On Friday, 16 November 2012 at 01:00:58 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 11/15/2012 4:11 PM, Stugol wrote:
am I likely to be told to fuck off again?
I haven't seen Bernard lately, so probably not.
I'm still about.
Bernard was certainly out of line with that remark
Absolutely. I let the NG ge
On Sunday, 18 November 2012 at 08:35:51 UTC, Philippe Sigaud
wrote:
I remember reading an article on graphs using D a few years
ago. Ah, there
it is:
http://www.massey.ac.nz/~kahawick/cstn/043/cstn-043.pdf
Hey, that guy was my lecturer! He turned me onto D in the
first place. Neat. :D
On Monday, 24 December 2012 at 03:48:47 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Some other way may as well be introduce entries in bugzilla.
Is adding things that don't belong in bugzilla to bugzilla really
a great idea?
On Saturday, 29 December 2012 at 02:11:03 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
I would expect rebasing to fix it trivially so long as git mv
was used rather
than renaming the file with the OS' commands, but I don't know
for sure.
- Jonathan M Davis
IIRC, Git can figure out if a raw renamed file (a n
Yes.
Agreed on all points. It's pathetic that this is still a problem. Check
the object for null. To not do so is a _bug_, even if Walter disagrees.
SDC will not replicate DMD's behaviour in this regard.
-Bernard.
Because it's a design issue, not a learning issue?
On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 01:28:54 +0100, Martin Nowak wrote:
> D_InlineAsm_X86 is just a normal version tag and does not imply asm
> code, so it has to.
D_InlineAsm_X86 is intended to be defined when an implementation supports
inline asm for x86. The compiler, when running CTFE, does not, so it
shou
kbuild is almost certainly not linking in phobos.
I'll just post my thoughts here while they're fresh. It looks good. The
documentation is what I'd expect from a Phobos module, as is the naming
convention.
auto _basicFtp(T)(const(char)[] url, const(void)[] sendData, Ftp client)
If you don't want people using it, shouldn't it be marked private
On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 22:48:55 -0800, Walter Bright wrote:
> russian porn spam
WHY WAS I NOT INFORMED?
I mean, terrible stuff. :o
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 20:04:39 +1300, Bernard Helyer
wrote:
On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 22:48:55 -0800, Walter Bright wrote:
russian porn spam
WHY WAS I NOT INFORMED?
I mean, terrible stuff. :o
Forgive me, but I'm just trying out Opera's NG reader.
Don't give the mouth breather the pleasure of a reply, please.
On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 09:38:56 +1300, Trass3r wrote:
Also,, in any case, you will want to wait until the community gains some
direction and organization. Eventually something like iodoom3 should
take over control and aggregate the useful patches floating around in
space.
Currently there are
On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 07:58:19 +1300, NMS wrote:
Is there a D parser written in D? - C strings kill me.
Thanks, NMS
SDC[1] has one, but it's being lazy loaded in -- that is, it's not
complete.
[1]:http://github.com/bhelyer/SDC
I don't need to share GC memory across instances or anything,
but I would be interested in using a C interface if possible.
If not, what's blocking it. If yes, how would one initialise
the runtime? I know there's a Windows DLL article on the website,
but I'm interested in Linux.
I know GDC can d
This is very useful information, so thank you for posting it, but
this looks like something that Phobos should pick up
automatically. I would note that the program works perfectly in
Linux without the need for setting the locale, so I'd imagine its
some encoding issue? Not really my area of exp
Hi, primary author of SDC here.
Existing compilers (DMD, LDC, GDC, DDMD) all descend directly
from the DMDFE. The DMDFE is thus the only real source of true
semantics of the language, except where directly contradicted by
Walter, Andrei, or TDPL. For the ecosystem to not become inbred,
a new
We intend to be compatible with DMD to a point. Where we are not,
will be through omission. Off the top of my head:
*delete will not be implemented.
*scope classes will not be implemented.
*complex numbers will not be implemented.
*version/debug levels will not be implemented, as their semantics
On Saturday, 10 December 2011 at 09:47:14 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 12/10/2011 10:40 AM, Bernard Helyer wrote:
We intend to be compatible with DMD to a point. Where we are
not, will
be through omission. Off the top of my head:
[...]
*D's forward reference and module order bugs will n
On Saturday, 10 December 2011 at 09:51:08 UTC, Somedude wrote:
Le 10/12/2011 08:54, Piotr Szturmaj a écrit :
And it would be *far* more frustrating for the users, who would
observe
different behaviors and different bugs on different compilers.
Hence
that would mean that writing portable code ne
On Saturday, 10 December 2011 at 11:11:44 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 12/10/2011 3:04 AM, Mehrdad wrote:
On 12/10/2011 3:01 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 12/10/2011 2:34 AM, Mehrdad wrote:
... and another...
struct Matrix(T, size_t N = 1)
{ public auto mul(Matrix!(T, N) other) const { return t
On Saturday, 10 December 2011 at 11:17:19 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 12/10/2011 10:54 AM, Bernard Helyer wrote:
On Saturday, 10 December 2011 at 09:47:14 UTC, Timon Gehr
wrote:
How is that an 'omission'?
Just my lame attempt at humour. :P
Should have thought of that. =)
Do you al
On Monday, 19 December 2011 at 22:59:37 UTC, Trass3r wrote:
Are you building SDC in the same fashion as clang by chance
where the pieces are modular and usable else ware? (such as
the parser being able to be used in an ide?)
It isn't as well-conceived. Hence the name, it started out as a
toy
Yes.
On Thursday, 5 January 2012 at 23:08:14 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Thursday, 5 January 2012 at 22:53:10 UTC, Stewart Gordon
wrote:
Or is it really not an online compiler, but rather an online
interface to a collection of compilers that the author has on
his computer?
Um... yes.
What d
On Friday, 20 January 2012 at 15:40:44 UTC, Robert Clipsham wrote:
Just came across this amusing 4 minute video:
https://www.destroyallsoftware.com/talks/wat
Anyone have any other WATs you can do in other languages? Bonus
points for WATs you can do in D.
void main()
{
import std.stdio;
With a big fat "subject to change use at own risk" warning
attached?
On Monday, 23 January 2012 at 11:15:02 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
[1] I don't even know what the fuck to call any of them
anymore. "Window manager", "Desktop Environment", "Shell",
"Compositor", and if I'm not mistaken there's even some damn
hybrids or some such, and some can be used together,
On Tuesday, 24 January 2012 at 02:17:09 UTC, Trass3r wrote:
Adapt the bot or configure your client to ignore the bot. Plain
simple.
You know who else configured their client to ignore bots?
Bin Laden.
You thought I was going to say Hitler, didn't you? Well that's
silly, Hitler was long dead
On Tuesday, 24 January 2012 at 02:35:43 UTC, Trass3r wrote:
It's really annoying. clang++ gives a lot of warnings and IDEs
are confused as well.
Queue Walter saying that it's needed for some ancient platform D
has never and will never exist/ed on in three... two...
On Tuesday, 24 January 2012 at 03:01:25 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Monday, January 23, 2012 19:52:27 Brad Anderson wrote:
Jonathan, Swiftly closing them is causing real pain for some
of us.
Certainly he could fix them and keep a log of the ones he
fixed then
actually close, say, 3 a day on
On Tuesday, 24 January 2012 at 03:52:25 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
wrote:
"Bernard Helyer" wrote in message
news:zqqqybjeqepidctwz...@dfeed.kimsufi.thecybershadow.net...
On Tuesday, 24 January 2012 at 03:01:25 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Monday, January 23, 2012 19:52:27 Brad Ande
On Tuesday, 24 January 2012 at 05:25:59 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Monday, January 23, 2012 21:58:18 Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Wait, Brad was being funny. No?
Well, if he was, it went completely over my head.
- Jonathan M Davis
Jonathan, Swiftly
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonatho
On Wednesday, 25 January 2012 at 12:03:15 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
wrote:
wrote in message
news:op.v8mxx6s9xa30qa@marton-pc...
Hi,
I have been thinking . Would not C and C++ backend would make
DMD more versatile?
D language could be used in many platforms easily.
D language could be used in .ne
I've found myself using dman more than I thought I would, but it
is a little annoying when it fails to find a page and I navigate
to it manually -- I wouldn't mind if I could improve dman for the
next release.
Perhaps a text file on GitHub we could submit pull requests to?
Thanks,
-Bernard.
On Saturday, 4 February 2012 at 20:58:23 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 2/3/2012 4:11 PM, bearophile wrote:
Aren't less than 10 minutes enough to fix this simple problem?
I don't know
why Walter likes to use ".c" as suffix for those files, I
don't remember his
answers on this topic, I have never
I've tried multiple times to contact Walter through his websites,
but apparently _that's_ a dead end so...
http://i.imgur.com/DzrN6.png
Look at it! The selection pulses! Empire's never looked so good!
There are some rough edges; the save games fail to load, demo
isn't working, the text log is
On Sunday, 5 February 2012 at 03:58:03 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
Static linking has its advantages too, but as far as phobos and
druntime are concerned, dynamic linking would be way way better.
Bollocks. In the general case (which is silly to talk about, I'll
admit) I'd take static lin
On Monday, 6 February 2012 at 04:33:56 UTC, Caligo wrote:
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 8:44 PM, Bernard Helyer
wrote:
I've tried multiple times to contact Walter through his
websites, but
apparently _that's_ a dead end so...
http://i.imgur.com/DzrN6.png
Look at it! The selection pulses
On Monday, 6 February 2012 at 12:42:31 UTC, Stewart Gordon wrote:
On 06/02/2012 02:44, Bernard Helyer wrote:
I've tried multiple times to contact Walter through his
websites, but apparently _that's_
a dead end so...
http://i.imgur.com/DzrN6.png
Look at it! The selection pulses
On Monday, 6 February 2012 at 10:55:22 UTC, Mattbeui wrote:
The source code is open or you did reverse engineering?
On classicempire.com there's a version for windows written in an
old version of D (old enough that it wouldn't even compile with a
modern copy of DMD1). I took that code and por
On Monday, 6 February 2012 at 18:04:24 UTC, Stewart Gordon wrote:
On 06/02/2012 13:48, Bernard Helyer wrote:
I started with Walter's original 2.01 D release. The font I'm
using is proportional, so
I've not a problem there.
You mean "The font I'm using is fixed&qu
On Tuesday, 7 February 2012 at 06:18:24 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 2/6/2012 4:42 AM, Stewart Gordon wrote:
The version I've contributed I emailed to Walter and he
eventually put it up on
the website. Is there any reason the same can't be done in
this instance?
Nope. Send it to me.
Awesome
I understand you have daddy issues that come out when you drink,
but can't you start a diary or something?
On Wednesday, 8 February 2012 at 08:19:28 UTC, Bee wrote:
Bernard Helyer wrote:
I understand you have daddy issues that come out when you
drink,
but can't you start a diary or something?
You are saying what, you lil prick?
I'm saying you get drunk and post random shit because
On Saturday, 11 February 2012 at 02:13:19 UTC, Tim Krimm wrote:
If you make a subset of D, it would most likely be named
Mini-D. But at that point you've got an enhanced C without
going C++.
Yes and that probably would be better than what I have now.
Going back and forth programming in C/C++
On Sunday, 12 February 2012 at 06:38:25 UTC, Adam wrote:
Bernard Helyer wrote:
On Wednesday, 8 February 2012 at 08:19:28 UTC, Bee wrote:
Bernard Helyer wrote:
I understand you have daddy issues that come out when you
drink,
but can't you start a diary or something?
You are saying what
On Sunday, 12 February 2012 at 14:31:44 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
wrote:
"Bernard Helyer" wrote in message
news:gtnbsoxlyvmpbptup...@dfeed.kimsufi.thecybershadow.net...
On Sunday, 12 February 2012 at 06:38:25 UTC, Adam wrote:
Bernard Helyer wrote:
On Wednesday, 8 February 2012 at 08
On Monday, 13 February 2012 at 19:27:39 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 2/13/2012 6:15 AM, Alf P. Steinbach wrote:
Are there group charters?
Not much beyond the descriptions here:
http://digitalmars.com/NewsGroup.html
We're pretty informal.
I read that last word as 'normal' and was about to
On Wednesday, 15 February 2012 at 07:27:56 UTC, RedShift wrote:
So, I'm just starting to get into D, using the extension for VS
called Visual D. Is there any way to stop the console from
disappearing like in C++? Like C + F5 (which doesn't seem to
work). Or like a getline?
Just pop a stdin.re
On Sunday, 19 February 2012 at 02:27:07 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 2/18/12 6:28 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Saturday, February 18, 2012 17:53:52 Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 2/18/12 5:47 PM, Jakob Ovrum wrote:
you are basically arguing against exceptions here
I must have argued m
On Sunday, 19 February 2012 at 03:33:14 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
That would potentially break code.
It would also potentially fix code.
Well that's the stupidest thing I've read today. Can you point to
people using it in the way that you expect? Besides which, that's
just about the worst way
On Sunday, 19 February 2012 at 04:01:45 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 02/19/2012 04:56 AM, Bernard Helyer wrote:
On Sunday, 19 February 2012 at 03:33:14 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
That would potentially break code.
It would also potentially fix code.
Well that's the stupidest thing I've
Maybe when you learn to type like an adult people will listen to
you?
On Monday, 20 February 2012 at 00:29:20 UTC, bls wrote:
On 02/19/2012 04:05 PM, Bernard Helyer wrote:
Maybe when you learn to type like an adult people will listen
to you?
Facts, that's what I am are talking about. If you don't like my
speak ...sorry.
My point is that D2 ne
On Monday, 20 February 2012 at 00:55:15 UTC, Alex Rønne Petersen
wrote:
Hi,
http://groovy.codehaus.org/Operators#Operators-SafeNavigationOperator
What do you folks think about this? Would it be useful to have
in D? It would make navigating large object graphs with
possible null values much ea
Nick replied to something about globbing
Having programs doing the globbing sounds great until you run
into someone who doesn't play ball. *cough* every single digital
mars utility *cough*. I think Windows and unix both get it wrong,
but unix gets it less wrong (as it could theoretically be
an
A discussion on the Mono-D IRC channel just made me realise
something.
dmd -c foo/a.d bar/a.d
The second module overwrites the first. This makes using 'pass
everything at once' with Mono-D (IDE plugin)
difficult/impossible. As far as I'm concerned, it's just a bug
that's never come up.
On Wednesday, 22 February 2012 at 22:05:51 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
Then what happens when you have
dmc -c foo/a.d foo_a.d
Good point.
Regardless, I really wouldn't like the idea of screwing with
the object file
names to try and avoid collisions.
Well, the thing is in this case eve
On Wednesday, 22 February 2012 at 22:44:15 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Wednesday, February 22, 2012 23:33:57 Bernard Helyer wrote:
On Wednesday, 22 February 2012 at 22:05:51 UTC, Jonathan M
Davis
wrote:
> Then what happens when you have
>
> dmc -c foo/a.d foo_a.d
G
On Thursday, 23 February 2012 at 21:28:17 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 01:42:44PM +0100, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2012-02-23 00:03, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>On Wednesday, February 22, 2012 23:50:53 Bernard Helyer wrote:
>>Except DMD is faster by a factor of 10 when p
On Thursday, 23 February 2012 at 23:06:56 UTC, Bernard Helyer
wrote:
Did you not read what Jacob posted?
my.module.A.o
my_module_A.o
my_module.A.o
my.module_A.o
No conflicts.
Also, you can't have a package called module.
http://dlang.org/abi.html
"The extern (C) and extern (D) calling convention matches the C
calling convention used by the supported C compiler on the host
system. Except that the extern (D) calling convention for Windows
x86 is described here."
Was this written by someone slamming their face
So as near as I can tell, it's trying to say
"On non-Windows platforms, both extern (C) and extern (D) match
the calling convention of the platforms C compiler. On Windows,
the extern (D) calling convention differs, and is documented
below:"
Is this accurate?
If so, there's is no way I am
On Thursday, 1 March 2012 at 06:07:40 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
For x86-32 dmd uses a fastcall, where EAX can contain a
parameter, for Windows AND all other supported OSes.
._.;
Well, that's nice to know, thanks. Because we (SDC) use fastcall
for D, just (we thought) as a temporary measure.
On Friday, 2 March 2012 at 11:53:56 UTC, Manu wrote:
Personally, I just want to be able to link like a normal
windows developer.
My code is C/C++, built with VC, and I want to link my D app
against those
libs using the VC linker, and debug with Visual Studio. This is
the
workflow I think the va
On Wednesday, 7 March 2012 at 18:39:41 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"Adam D. Ruppe" wrote in message
news:sgmfyzmrfygshlmfq...@forum.dlang.org...
On Tuesday, 6 March 2012 at 20:20:47 UTC, Derek wrote:
Should we use American or English spelling? Color verses
Colour, for example?
I can go eithe
On Thursday, 8 March 2012 at 09:25:19 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Thursday, March 08, 2012 09:45:34 David Nadlinger wrote:
On Saturday, 3 March 2012 at 11:44:54 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
> Walter, how big is it really? Small enough to be done as,
> say,
> a gsoc
> project? Would you be i
On Friday, 9 March 2012 at 07:02:47 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Friday, March 09, 2012 01:45:13 Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"H. S. Teoh" wrote in message
news:mailman.289.1331260526.4860.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
[...]
> T
That's one great thing about Ohio: A few years back we had a
stat
On Friday, 16 March 2012 at 02:17:13 UTC, ixid wrote:
Do you think a minor renaming like using Dlang as the name
consistently would be damaging?
Yes. Changing it now is an incredibly stupid idea.
On Sunday, 18 March 2012 at 00:53:17 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 3/17/2012 5:40 PM, Sean Kelly wrote:
In truth it would be
else version (Posix)
Anyway, which isn't the bare else Walter was advising against.
And is Posix really predictably compatible across diverse
systems?
If you restric
On Sunday, 18 March 2012 at 01:23:42 UTC, Manu wrote:
My minimum recommendation: D needs an explicit 'virtual'
keyword, and to
fix that D1 bug, so putting final: at the top of your class
works, and
everything from there works as it should.
Agreed. Final by default is a proposition long gone,
On Sunday, 18 March 2012 at 04:04:30 UTC, Sean Kelly wrote:
On Mar 17, 2012, at 6:00 PM, "Bernard Helyer"
wrote:
On Sunday, 18 March 2012 at 00:53:17 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 3/17/2012 5:40 PM, Sean Kelly wrote:
In truth it would be
else version (Posix)
Anyway, which isn&
1 - 100 of 282 matches
Mail list logo
