On Tuesday, 2 January 2018 at 07:10:14 UTC, ChangLong wrote:
On Monday, 1 January 2018 at 03:06:42 UTC, David Nadlinger
wrote:
On Saturday, 30 December 2017 at 13:48:16 UTC, ChangLong wrote:
After fiber yield, the spoke guard is not able to execute,
unless I throw a exception in Fiber. I am l
On Monday, 1 January 2018 at 03:06:42 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
On Saturday, 30 December 2017 at 13:48:16 UTC, ChangLong wrote:
After fiber yield, the spoke guard is not able to execute,
unless I throw a exception in Fiber. I am look if there is
some hack method to make the fiber Interrupte
I try to find a way to yield custom fiber without throw
exception, is it possible ?
I need make sure the scope guard is executed and the resource
will auto release relay on scope(exit).
After fiber yield, the spoke guard is not able to execute,
unless I throw a exception in Fiber. I am lo
On Thursday, 28 December 2017 at 03:31:19 UTC, ChangLong wrote:
On Wednesday, 27 December 2017 at 10:08:37 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 12/27/2017 12:59 AM, Dan Partelly wrote:
All could have been prevented by going the C++ route of 0
cost abstraction,
C++ is not 0 cost abstraction, despite the
On Wednesday, 27 December 2017 at 10:08:37 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 12/27/2017 12:59 AM, Dan Partelly wrote:
All could have been prevented by going the C++ route of 0 cost
abstraction,
C++ is not 0 cost abstraction, despite the marketing. It's why
C++ compilers have switches to disable thin
On Wednesday, 25 November 2015 at 10:17:02 UTC, Suliman wrote:
If SDL will stay by default I will prefer to move to any other
build system or will downgrade to old version of DUB.
JSON +1
On Tuesday, 18 August 2015 at 12:58:45 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Tuesday, 18 August 2015 at 12:37:37 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
I think stability of the DMD backend is a goal of much higher
value than the performance of the code it emits. DMD is never
going to match the code generation quality
On Sunday, 9 August 2015 at 09:07:51 UTC, JDemler wrote:
We can read files at compile-time:
enum file = import(fileName);
But we cannot write to a file or create files at compile time.
Generating code at compile-time and mixing it in is fun but has
a few flaws.
It isn't debuggable, the gene
On Saturday, 8 August 2015 at 13:08:08 UTC, Temtaime wrote:
Hi !
I want to add some sugar to D : sometimes it's necessary to use
complex start index.
For example:
auto sub = arr[idx + 123 * 10..idx + 123 * 10 + 1];
Proposal is to add a mnemonic for start index, for instance :
auto sub = arr[
On Tuesday, 28 July 2015 at 12:49:17 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
So... instead of having traits / concepts, what I wanted from D
is to be able to do this:
struct MyRange: isInputRange { ... }
or
struct MyRange: static isInputRange { ... } // that way classes
could do this too
+1
Concept like
On Monday, 13 July 2015 at 15:57:41 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Monday, 13 July 2015 at 12:12:22 UTC, ChangLong wrote:
3) No Inversion of Control (aka: Dependency Injection)
Concept
Since this is a broad term, on which level do you miss an
explicit concept for this? Any concrete example?
Like this
On Monday, 13 July 2015 at 10:49:16 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Am 13.07.2015 um 06:29 schrieb ChangLong:
I has use vibe.d for a small project recently, after finish
that I
think the follow fact will
prevent many programmers use vibe.d in commercial projects:
1) Lack of successful open source pr
On Monday, 13 July 2015 at 10:12:33 UTC, Faux Amis wrote:
On Mon 13/07/2015 06:29, ChangLong wrote:
On Sunday, 12 July 2015 at 12:14:31 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
-snip-
What do you think about the future for D in the web service
space?
I has use vibe.d for a small project recently, a
On Sunday, 12 July 2015 at 12:14:31 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
I've been thinking a bit about where languages fit in the web
service space. Both mobile app and web services are likely
candidates for typed and efficient languages. I'm not at all
happy with the "prolific" choices that are av
14 matches
Mail list logo
