Nick Sabalausky wrote:
So anyway, with my own Haxe implementation, I can just add an optional
-sane switch to enable either a runtime or compile-time check...And nobody
can stop me!! Mwuuahahahaha!! AH HA HA HA!!! BWAH HA HA HA!@!!!
HAHhahahaAHHAAHA - As a long time haXe user I appreciate
deadalnix wrote:
http://www.infoq.com/presentations/Understanding-Java-Garbage-Collection
This is java focussed, but I think this is still very interesting for D
people. So I'm sharing it here.
The first half wasn't even java focussed at all :-)
Great intro to most of the definitions and GC
Op Tue, 14 Sep 2010 21:33:37 +0200 schreef Nick Sabalausky a...@a.a:
But you do raise a good point. What's the current state of ddmd's
front-end?
What I have in mind is to just rip out dmd's current backend stuff
entirely,
maybe even including the toObjFile and toIR methods, or at least big
Op Sat, 17 Jul 2010 14:13:12 +0200 schreef Andrej Mitrovic
and.mitro...@hotmail.com:
If anyone is interested, I've emailed the organizers and they said the
whole thing will be video recorded (therefore posted online as well).
I hope it will be online soon :-)
Op Mon, 28 Jun 2010 10:33:24 +0200 schreef Norbert Nemec
norb...@nemec-online.de:
Conceptually, the ultimate solution would certainly be to place code for
input contract checking in the *calling* code. After all, this checking
code serves to debug the calling code, so it should be left to
I got two collectors editions. I'll sell one for 1000$ :-D
On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 13:10:00 +0200, Tyro[a.c.edwards] no.s...@home.com
wrote:
good for you, sucks for me though, I didn't get a collector's edition
and I ordered my copy back in over six months ago.
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 14:18:52 +0100, Leandro Lucarella llu...@gmail.com
wrote:
Again? RC is *not* -nogc, is -anothergc. And reference counting won't do
the trick unless you add a backing GC to free cycles. What I mean about
-nogc is *no* GC, is please, mr compiler, give me an error when a GC
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 07:54:56 +0100, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
At least we copy with attribution :o).
Andrei
@lol
And yes, it was out loud.
:D
Op Fri, 11 Dec 2009 16:37:47 +0100 schreef Jeremie Pelletier
jerem...@gmail.com:
You're quite right, I'll look into it and make a light-on-dark color
theme for it.
That would be awesome.
Op Fri, 27 Nov 2009 11:58:59 +0100 schreef Don nos...@nospam.com:
void foo()
@naked body
{
LOL! Spam filters would love that!!
I can already imagine the jokes spreading over the internets:
@safe public double penetration(of a) @naked body { ... }
Op Fri, 30 Oct 2009 11:44:08 +0100 schreef bearophile
bearophileh...@lycos.com:
Simpler alternative, the dot isn't necessary:
traits_compiles(XXX)
traits_typeid(TTT)
traits_stringof(T)
traits_allmembers(T)
traits_error(message);
Not nice. Bad.
Op Thu, 22 Oct 2009 07:44:44 +0200 schreef AJ a...@nospam.net:
Also, referring to your second struct example above, D never has
semicolons directly after a closing curly-brace.
Isn't that ironic!
Kinda far fetched to call that ironic. The struct decleration was already
ended by '}'.
Op Thu, 17 Sep 2009 16:56:41 +0200 schreef Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org:
I have big plans with Variant - I want to make it (or a related type)
the variable type common in dynamic languages, with flexibility, dynamic
invocation using common syntax, the works. So if you
Op Wed, 02 Sep 2009 21:39:28 +0200 schreef Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org:
I plan to add a Nullable struct to Phobos (akin to C#'s Nullable,
Boost's Optional).
Apparently a good design is to define Optional!T with a minimum of
member functions (ideally none) and have
Op Wed, 02 Sep 2009 22:20:04 +0200 schreef Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org:
Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 4:13 PM, Simen Kjaeraassimen.kja...@gmail.com
wrote:
Danny Wilson blueze...@gmail.com wrote:
Op Wed, 02 Sep 2009 21:39:28 +0200 schreef Andrei
Op Wed, 02 Sep 2009 22:55:53 +0200 schreef Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org:
So if pointers wouldn't be considered evil, Maybe!T* would suffice?
Can someone point me out what the big difference is between ref and
simply disallowing pointer arithmitic? Is it marketing?
Op Wed, 26 Aug 2009 02:04:18 +0200 schreef bearophile
bearophileh...@lycos.com:
Note: LTO isn't done automatically yet by LDC, so to do it you have to
input 3 different commands.
Ask (to me, for example) if you want to know them.
Well I do :-)
Op Fri, 19 Jun 2009 22:53:54 +0200 schreef Sean Kelly
s...@invisibleduck.org:
Uppercase.
Thats awesome, made me chuckle. :-)
Calling it 'd' lacks a certain punch.
Op Tue, 09 Jun 2009 18:38:36 +0200 schreef grauzone n...@example.net:
BCS wrote:
Hello grauzone,
I'd even prefer a flash widget that would provide proper UI
Oh god... oh god no... I'm going to have nightmares again...
yah, ditto, OTOH that was in a tone of if all else fails
OK.
Op Thu, 28 May 2009 03:08:45 +0200 schreef Tomas Lindquist Olsen
tomas.l.ol...@gmail.com:
* put the code under version control, that could simplify pulling
fixes into our tree.
You could setup a seperate branch with the DMD source, extract source
tarball, commit.
Then merge the DMDFE
Op Sat, 25 Apr 2009 15:07:52 +0200 schreef Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org:
It looks we can't make it with only T[]. We need a genuine container
type, and T[new] was suggested. It would probably have value semantics.
T[U] seems to have the same problem. If T[U] is the
Op Sat, 18 Apr 2009 09:24:39 +0200 schreef Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org:
now you have an easy way to know if a type is dynamic without changing
the method invocation syntax. A proper IDE can easily mark those Types
as different, for example, using a different color.
Op Fri, 17 Apr 2009 22:31:04 +0200 schreef Nick Sabalausky a...@a.a:
But with opDotExp, its mere *existence* undermines my ability to be sure
that non-quoted identifiers are ok as long as they've compiled. That
type of
tradeoff is obviously fine when the potential benefits are significant
Op Sat, 18 Apr 2009 12:25:55 +0200 schreef Danny Wilson
blueze...@gmail.com:
Op Fri, 17 Apr 2009 22:31:04 +0200 schreef Nick Sabalausky a...@a.a:
so far, opDotExp's benefits are trivial at best. I don't want to have to
keep track of ok, is this class using opDotExp or not, because
I tried using DMD OSX with DSSS yesterday. For some reason it whines when
using -version=Posix
Error: version identifier 'Posix' is reserved and cannot be set.
Is that a bug or a feature :-)?
Op Sat, 14 Feb 2009 21:11:38 +0100 schreef Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com:
Now
Op Thu, 29 Jan 2009 22:42:49 +0100 schreef Derek Parnell
de...@psych.ward:
Curious that first/last didn't get a mention in your poll?
Woops, sorry about that. Added it below the others, otherwise it messed up
the voting count :-S
foreach(languageStatement; AllProgrammingLanguages)
Stdout.format(
It's possible to create grotesque configurations of '{}' which are ~
extremely difficult to analyze. But most uses of {} are simple.,
languageStatement
).newline;
27 matches
Mail list logo
