On Sunday, 23 September 2018 at 21:15:17 UTC, FromAnotherPlanet
wrote:
On Friday, 21 September 2018 at 06:34:47 UTC, Vladimir
Panteleev wrote:
On Friday, 21 September 2018 at 06:30:40 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 9/20/2018 10:11 PM, mate wrote:
Note that the build can be done at compile time
On Friday, 21 September 2018 at 06:34:47 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Friday, 21 September 2018 at 06:30:40 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 9/20/2018 10:11 PM, mate wrote:
Note that the build can be done at compile time because the
metaprogramming capabilities of the language are not limited
On Thursday, 12 April 2018 at 21:01:47 UTC, Arnold Blake wrote:
I hired a remote developer in the language of the programming
python, there was such a question as to how much should I pay
him for the work? how many per hour? What kind of salary do
they have, are different countries interested,
On Sunday, 17 June 2018 at 16:52:59 UTC, Neia Neutuladh wrote:
The only case where D loses out is compared to { get; private
set; }.
That's a pretty big thing to give up. That allows for pretty
valuable control over visibility of encapsulated properties.
What's the differences in the approaches between SOLID and
component programming? Are they orthogonal? Or can they be used
together?
Hi, I come from a C# background and have been looking at D. How
well does D implement solid principals? I've grown to really
enjoy the SOLID style.
For those unfamiliar, SOLID is an acronym for:
- Single purpose: Meaning every unit of code (whether it's a
function or class) should only
On Saturday, 16 June 2018 at 19:20:30 UTC, FromAnotherPlanet
wrote:
Hi, I come from a C# background and have been looking at D. How
well does D implement solid principals? I've grown to really
enjoy the SOLID style.
For those unfamiliar, SOLID is an acronym for:
- Single purpose: Meaning
