On Tuesday, 12 December 2017 at 02:30:39 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 12/11/2017 2:30 PM, Jakob Bornecrantz wrote:
It is not written in D, but the language is close enough in
concepts that it can be mechanically ported into D, and is
licensed under BOOST. Feel free to do what ever to it[1
On Monday, 11 December 2017 at 20:45:38 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 12/11/2017 6:22 AM, Jakob Bornecrantz wrote:
There are loads of implementations of CommonMark
https://github.com/commonmark/CommonMark/wiki/List-of-CommonMark-Implementations
They appear to be libraries that offer an
On Monday, 11 December 2017 at 00:54:00 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 12/10/2017 6:22 AM, meppl wrote:
I think these are wrong criterias to estimate the value of
commonmark. Commonmark doesn't need to list anyone and doesn't
need to be listed by anyone to be a standard. commonmark is a
standard
On Thursday, 6 July 2017 at 22:58:36 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grostad
wrote:
On Thursday, 6 July 2017 at 18:26:18 UTC, Joakim wrote:
so you can seamlessly pass objects to javascript. I believe
people have written their own GCs that target webasm, so the D
GC can likely be made to do the same.
You wo
On Thursday, 15 June 2017 at 01:34:01 UTC, Manu wrote:
Hey people, I haven't checked in for a while, I'm yet again
tempted to use D for a small work thing, but I'll need LDC for
it, and debuginfo needs to work or it's a non-starter.
Does anyone know where that stuff stands? What are the limits
On Tuesday, 19 July 2016 at 16:13:21 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 July 2016 at 16:01:01 UTC, Lodovico Giaretta
wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 July 2016 at 15:48:26 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
Small string optimization should _help_ std::string, no?
Atila
Small string optimization will make the
On Tuesday, 19 July 2016 at 10:07:11 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 July 2016 at 02:54:37 UTC, Saurabh Das wrote:
Posted on Atila's blog yesterday:
https://atilanevesoncode.wordpress.com/2016/07/18/c-is-not-magically-fast-part-2/
So, about D vs C++ there... last night for reasons I f
On Sunday, 19 June 2016 at 14:04:15 UTC, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
On Sunday, 19 June 2016 at 12:38:00 UTC, Jakob Bornecrantz
wrote:
On Sunday, 19 June 2016 at 11:12:50 UTC, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
This thread is partly to announce that i will be adding to
LDC the ability to generate code for GPUs
On Sunday, 19 June 2016 at 11:12:50 UTC, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
This thread is partly to announce that i will be adding to LDC
the ability to generate code for GPUs through OpenCL, CUDA (and
if i have time) Metal in my fork at
https://github.com/thewilsonator/ldc and partly to request the
rese
On Saturday, 18 June 2016 at 20:04:50 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
8. create a greenthreads module that works like Goroutines
Please don't use the term gorourines when describing a bunch of
library functions. There is more to them then just functions. You
will need compiler and GC support for th
On Saturday, 5 March 2016 at 11:05:09 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
What features you'd highlight to enterprise-ish user?
Have go solved stacktraces in gorutines, last I checked this was
a big pain point for go developers, otherwise its a good issue to
bring up.
Cheers, Jakob.
On Wednesday, 28 October 2015 at 17:36:03 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 10/28/2015 2:12 AM, Jakob Bornecrantz wrote:
You are not in good company tho. Even the page you link to says
nobody else could or should say stuff like that.
And attitudes like that will only disurage people from trying
to
On Wednesday, 28 October 2015 at 17:13:27 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
http://sarah.thesharps.us/2015/10/05/closing-a-door/
https://mjg59.dreamwidth.org/38136.html
These are different times.
Yup, professional victim use to not be a viable career path.
What do you mean?
Cheers, Jakob.
On Wednesday, 28 October 2015 at 08:36:07 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 10/13/2015 12:13 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 10/13/2015 6:36 AM, Daniel Kozak wrote:
lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2015-October/091218.html
Maybe we could have something similar in D community
No. People who need to b
On Friday, 27 September 2013 at 11:35:29 UTC, Bruno Medeiros
wrote:
"Hardware does get faster more rapidly than software gets
slower -- I'm finding Eclipse perfectly usable on modern
hardware."
https://twitter.com/ID_AA_Carmack/status/383334141078429697
I would have liked some more details on
On Saturday, 21 September 2013 at 18:23:20 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Zhouxuan:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11086
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11010
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10970
I've found and reported these bugs after about merely 100 LOCs
On Friday, 22 July 2011 at 22:06:20 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
[SNIP]
Walter is reluctantly on board with a change in this direction,
with the note that he'd just recommend interfaces for this kind
of separation. My stance in this matter is that we shouldn't
constrain without necessit
On Saturday, 23 February 2013 at 11:31:21 UTC, Lars T.
Kyllingstad wrote:
It's been years in the coming, but we finally got it done. :)
The upshot is that the module has actually seen active use over
those years, both by yours truly and others, so hopefully the
worst wrinkles are already irone
On Saturday, 23 February 2013 at 22:48:04 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 03:15:26PM -0500, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On Sat, 23 Feb 2013 11:42:26 -0500, H. S. Teoh
wrote:
>- wait():
> - Some code examples would be nice.
>
> - For the POSIX-specific version, I thought the
On Tuesday, 25 December 2012 at 19:37:42 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
I've often heard that claim, but here's an article with what
the substance is:
http://dubhrosa.blogspot.co.uk/2012/12/lessons-learning-haskell.html?m=1
Note that D offers this style of programming, with checkable
purity, immut
On Saturday, 15 December 2012 at 17:05:59 UTC, Peter Alexander
wrote:
On Saturday, 15 December 2012 at 16:55:39 UTC, Russel Winder
wrote:
A quick straw poll. Do people prefer to have all sources
compiled in a
single compiler call, or (more like C++) separate compilation
of each
object followe
On Thursday, 6 December 2012 at 18:40:57 UTC, Alex Rønne Petersen
wrote:
Hi,
I decided to take a stab at reviving the new std.process
written by Lars T. Kyllingstad and Steven Schveighoffer.
The result is here:
https://github.com/alexrp/phobos/tree/new-std-process-update
https://github.com
On Wednesday, 24 October 2012 at 09:03:25 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
On 2012-10-24 09:54, Jakob Bornecrantz wrote:
Hey everybody.
How are you supposed to pass static arrays to C functions? I'm
asking
because I'm getting conflicting info from how DMD works and on
IRC.
The bel
Hey everybody.
How are you supposed to pass static arrays to C functions? I'm
asking because I'm getting conflicting info from how DMD works
and on IRC.
The below example prints:
test1 0x7fff857c1db0
test2 0x7fff857c1db0
test3 (nil)
test4 0x7fff857c1db0
D:
void main()
{
float[3] arr
On Tuesday, 23 October 2012 at 10:36:11 UTC, Daniel Kozák wrote:
Hi,
First of all, I think there is no difference in speed between
LargeStruct foo, too, temp;
temp = foo - too;
bar.func(temp);
and with func without ref.
That doesn't seem to be the case, as at least DMD always copies
to the s
Hey everybody!
A bit of background; I'm porting some code over from D1 to D2 and
I ran into a bit of a problem. I have a bunch of code that looks
something like this:
class Bar : Other {
override void func(ref LargeStruct st) {}
}
Bar bar;
LargeStruct foo, too;
bar.func(foo - too);
This c
On Tuesday, 3 July 2012 at 11:43:04 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On 3 July 2012 11:55, Jakob Bornecrantz
wrote:
On Tuesday, 3 July 2012 at 10:12:39 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
Hi,
I'm going to be pushing gdc-4.8 package into debian this
weekend (give
about a fortnight for it to land in sid)
On Tuesday, 3 July 2012 at 10:12:39 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
Hi,
I'm going to be pushing gdc-4.8 package into debian this
weekend (give about a fortnight for it to land in sid) - is
anyone interested in porting Druntime / Phobos over to the
architectures that Debian supports? I can give anyon
On Thursday, 28 June 2012 at 07:38:19 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
In production it's just a way to say "completed, not still in
pre-alpha/alpha/beta/testing phase". Usable. Working. Public :)
No difference between commercial, open source, free, etc ...
Software is never completed only abandone
On Saturday, 12 May 2012 at 23:27:15 UTC, Alex Rønne Petersen
wrote:
You know, my project consisting of 130-ish source files and
24.000-ish lines of code compiles from scratch in ~20 seconds
on my machine, building one file at a time... I honestly have
not managed to come up with a build syst
On Wednesday, 14 March 2012 at 23:51:30 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 12:20:43AM +0100, Jakob Bornecrantz
wrote:
[...]
struct AAver1(K, V)
{
K[] tbl; V[] tlb2; uint size;
}
struct AAver2(K, V)
{
K[] tbl; V[] tbl2; V[] optimizationTbl;
}
Would break if a AAver1 table
On Wednesday, 14 March 2012 at 14:02:30 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 22:39:25 -0400, Jakob Bornecrantz
wrote:
On Wednesday, 14 March 2012 at 00:52:32 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Hi all,
My AA implementation is slowly inching closer to being ready
to replace aaA.d. So
On Wednesday, 14 March 2012 at 13:55:23 UTC, Don Clugston wrote:
On 14/03/12 03:39, Jakob Bornecrantz wrote:
On Wednesday, 14 March 2012 at 00:52:32 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Hi all,
My AA implementation is slowly inching closer to being ready
to
replace aaA.d. So far I've been writin
On Wednesday, 14 March 2012 at 09:07:40 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky
wrote:
On 14.03.2012 6:39, Jakob Bornecrantz wrote:
On Wednesday, 14 March 2012 at 00:52:32 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Hi all,
My AA implementation is slowly inching closer to being ready
to
replace aaA.d. So far I've been wr
On Wednesday, 14 March 2012 at 00:52:32 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Hi all,
My AA implementation is slowly inching closer to being ready to
replace aaA.d. So far I've been writing the implementation
outside of object_.d for ease of testing & development; now I'm
ready to start moving stuff into obj
On Monday, 23 January 2012 at 18:08:51 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 1/23/2012 5:08 AM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
Walter, what are your views on emitting the names of aliased
types to debug?
I don't really have an opinion on it, except that generally
when I'm debugging I'm interested in what a type r
On Thursday, 15 December 2011 at 20:42:26 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
On 2011-12-15 20:41, Walter Bright wrote:
On 12/15/2011 9:49 AM, Robert Clipsham wrote:
* Do it all in one go, and DO NOT GET DISTRACTED. The moment
you start
trying to
clean up code as well as finish porting it you introduce
On Thursday, 15 December 2011 at 02:10:09 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 12/14/2011 4:32 PM, Jakob Bornecrantz wrote:
In short it can be answered with the questions "Can you
guarantee it work?"
A guarantee would be something like you paid $x for it and I
would refund your $x if y
On Thursday, 15 December 2011 at 03:19:47 UTC, Jesse Phillips
wrote:
On Thu, 15 Dec 2011 01:32:35 +0100, Jakob Bornecrantz wrote:
My current code base is 40Kloc's where about 8Kloc of those
are library
bindings, on top of that it also includes a couple of C
projects sources
(expat, lu
On Wednesday, 14 December 2011 at 18:55:23 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 12/14/2011 10:28 AM, Jakob Bornecrantz wrote:
I don't know where the D1 community is, or even if it exists
anymore.
I'm here!
Thanks for speaking up.
np.
Anyways couldn't you just do releases less oft
On Wednesday, 14 December 2011 at 09:50:09 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 12/14/2011 12:30 AM, Don wrote:
So, didn't sound then as though D1 was a big issue. Yet a
month later you
announce you've made a private decision about axing D1.
Feels exactly like a military coup.
Well, it wasn't one. Th
41 matches
Mail list logo
