Re: Qt 4.5 to be LGPL

2009-01-18 Thread Katrina Niolet
Walter Bright Wrote: > I don't know Qt, so if you could do a writeup on exactly what D2 needs > to support Qt, that would be most helpful. Yep, will do! Give me a few days on this please, I want to make sure I get everything in there.

Re: Qt 4.5 to be LGPL

2009-01-15 Thread Katrina Niolet
Stewart Gordon Wrote: > Bill Baxter wrote: > > Qt 4.5 to be LGPL > > http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09%2F01%2F14%2F1312210 > > > > Now we just need a D port... > > There was Indigo, not exactly a port but a library to mimic Qt's API. > http://www.dsource.org/projects/indigo/ > > But th

Re: Qt 4.5 to be LGPL

2009-01-15 Thread Katrina Niolet
Bill Baxter Wrote: > In Qt the binding is more dynamic. You can call a slot in Qt even if > all you have is its name in a run-time string. > Qt also uses a similar mechanism to provide runtime dynamic > properties. For anything derived from QObject you can ask if it has a > "color" property (agai