Walter Bright Wrote:
> All releases are sent to Lars before going out so the Tango team can let
> me know if I broke something. I haven't heard any word that it has.
I did however send word that I didn't have time to test it this time around :)
should also include the AFL and BSD when used in Tango.
To change the license to something else at this point (for instance to
Apache 2.0 only), would be a major undertaking, but something that we may
consider to do at a later point.
--
Lars Ivar Igesund
blog at http://larsivi.net
DSource, #d.tango & #D: larsivi
Dancing the Tango
ould certainly not become any bigger (in scope), as that would
defeat the purpose of separating the runtime from userspace in the first place.
The topic of common userspace functionality should be kept separate from the
topic of druntime.
--
Lars Ivar Igesund
blog at http://larsivi.net
DSource, #d.tango & #D: larsivi
Dancing the Tango
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> Lars Ivar Igesund wrote:
>> Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>
>>> Lars Ivar Igesund wrote:
>>>> Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Lars Ivar Igesund wrote:
>>>>>> No, you misunderstand. I
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> Lars Ivar Igesund wrote:
>> Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>
>>> Lars Ivar Igesund wrote:
>>>> No, you misunderstand. I said safely call, not exceptionally
>>>> efficient. To me a virtual call would be acceptable. However,
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> "Lars Ivar Igesund" wrote
>> Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
>>> I can't really understand whether it is required to distribute the
>>> source code of a derivative work under the Academic Free License, so I
>>> don
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> "Lars Ivar Igesund" wrote
>> Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
>>
>>> "Piotrek" wrote
>>>> Hello!
>>>>
>>>> It's just an idea. After reading about issues on disallowing DWT to
>&
take the source and say you wrote it (unless you actually did) -
not a problem for a single person unless he'd like to be dishonest.
Saying that Tango is license-encumbered in any way is a gross misunderstanding.
--
Lars Ivar Igesund
blog at http://larsivi.net
DSource, #d.tango & #D: larsivi
Dancing the Tango
re is that written down? I can't find that anywhere in
> the Tango license.
Steve is wrong in this matter.
--
Lars Ivar Igesund
blog at http://larsivi.net
DSource, #d.tango & #D: larsivi
Dancing the Tango
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> Lars Ivar Igesund wrote:
>> No, you misunderstand. I said safely call, not exceptionally
>> efficient. To me a virtual call would be acceptable. However, at
>> least in my cases, there would normally not be more than one
>> imlemented inter
Christopher Wright wrote:
> Walter Bright wrote:
>> Yigal Chripun wrote:
>>> Walter Bright wrote:
>>>> Lars Ivar Igesund wrote:
>>>>> toe() ?! tail() good, rear() not so good, toe() sucks.
>>>>
>>>> tail() is no good b
> on something, but really rethinking how a particular module is implemented
> to
> cater to const properly. Thankfully, however, const is now a stable
> target. Once pure/shared/unshared gets introduced, it will probably
> require more effort, but probably not as much as with const.
There is also the question of how SafeD should be catered for.
--
Lars Ivar Igesund
blog at http://larsivi.net
DSource, #d.tango & #D: larsivi
Dancing the Tango
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> Lars Ivar Igesund wrote:
>> Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>
>>> Lars Ivar Igesund wrote:
>>>> Jason House wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I&#x
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> Lars Ivar Igesund wrote:
>> Jason House wrote:
>>
>>> Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'd be curious to find out more about a runtime queryable struct
>>>> interface. How would it work? What idioms w
at runtime. Inheritance could/should be
non-polymorphic and compile-time, but I want to know at runtime that a void*
has implemented a given interface.
--
Lars Ivar Igesund
blog at http://larsivi.net
DSource, #d.tango & #D: larsivi
Dancing the Tango
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> Lars Ivar Igesund wrote:
>> Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>
>>> Lars Ivar Igesund wrote:
>>>> Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> For example, I'm not sure how code in std.algorithm could
Lars Ivar Igesund wrote:
> Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>
>> Denis Koroskin wrote:
>>> On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 18:21:55 +0300, Andrei Alexandrescu
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Lars Ivar Igesund wrote:
>>>>> Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>&
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> Denis Koroskin wrote:
>> On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 18:21:55 +0300, Andrei Alexandrescu
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Lars Ivar Igesund wrote:
>>>> Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> For example, I'm not sure
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> Lars Ivar Igesund wrote:
>> Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>
>>> For example, I'm not sure how code in std.algorithm could help
>>> containers or streams in Tango (as it should), or how to reconcile
>>> std.algorithm
the process of
defining those interfaces (if Tango is meant to use/know about them). Since I
have seen neither, it is somewhat difficult to make a well informed comment on
the subject.
--
Lars Ivar Igesund
blog at http://larsivi.net
DSource, #d.tango & #D: larsivi
Dancing the Tango
ion between phobos and tango in the module naming?
> Logically:
>
> phobos -> std
> tango -> stdex (not tango -> tango)
Tango will stay Tango (and tango.*). The above naming assumes that Tango will
depend on Phobos, and it will not.
--
Lars Ivar Igesund
blog at http://la
's SVN repositories in one of the branches) and you are welcome to
contribute further.
--
Lars Ivar Igesund
blog at http://larsivi.net
DSource, #d.tango & #D: larsivi
Dancing the Tango
Bill Baxter wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 7:23 PM, Lars Ivar Igesund
> wrote:
>> dsimcha wrote:
>>
>>> == Quote from Jason House (jason.james.ho...@gmail.com)'s article
>>>> I couldn't agree more!
>>>> I never understood why people
My hope is that
> the GDC people are just waiting for the dust to settle a little on D2,
> rather than maintaining a moving target.
Related to the commit the other day is this post I made:
http://www.dsource.org/projects/tango/forums/topic/664
I think Arthur intend to have something post
Sean Kelly wrote:
> Bowser-neutral web apps?
You mean Super Mario been at them?
--
Lars Ivar Igesund
blog at http://larsivi.net
DSource, #d.tango & #D: larsivi
Dancing the Tango
Walter Bright wrote:
> Lars Ivar Igesund wrote:
>> It is up to you to use twitter for something useful - saying there is
>> nothing useful on twitter is like saying there is nothing useful on
>> blogs. Not everyone write blogs about their last cup of tea, and
>> neither
many followers to
show for it. What I find weird are those that themselves follow equally many
accounts (hundreds) - they have spare time issues :)
--
Lars Ivar Igesund
blog at http://larsivi.net
DSource, #d.tango & #D: larsivi
Dancing the Tango
t;something.traits.max
>>something.traits.sizeof
>>(1+34.).traits.typeof
>>
>>I do like the general idea of unifying this stuff. Can you make an
>>alias or variable of this .traits/.reflect type? Can it return a
>>metaclass type of some sort so that an alias would be possible? I.e.
>>alias t = something.traits;
>>
>
> That would make it much easier to port over Java code that uses
> reflection. And even aside from that, I think it's a very nice and clean
> solution.
vote++
--
Lars Ivar Igesund
blog at http://larsivi.net
DSource, #d.tango & #D: larsivi
Dancing the Tango
doing something should be verbs, and this is even more important for official
API's. I suggest create.
Although I don't agree with putting a wrapper for ClassInfo.create in Object
just for the sake of it, in the first place :P
--
Lars Ivar Igesund
blog at http://larsivi.net
DSource, #d.t
rograms. It is harder to say how the implicitly
statically typed stuff of ShedSkin affects mantainability, but I guess one
could expect/hope for it to be better than normal Python.
--
Lars Ivar Igesund
blog at http://larsivi.net
DSource, #d.tango & #D: larsivi
Dancing the Tango
d found even better ways of
> doing things... :-)
Since I am working on DDBI, I was curious as to whether you are competing, or
building something that would/could live on top of it :)
--
Lars Ivar Igesund
blog at http://larsivi.net
DSource, #d.tango & #D: larsivi
Dancing the Tango
dolive wrote:
> Lars Kyllingstad :
>
>> dolive wrote:
>> > dolive :
>> >
>> >> Some people to convert jdo2.2 for rdbms to d ?
>> >>
>> >> http://www.datanucleus.org/
>> >> http://www.datanucleus.org/products/accessplatform_1_1/index.html
>> >
>> > Nobody wants to do?
>> >
>> >
to many people, and some even have
attached frontend patches, which is why there will continue to be something
close to hard feelings on this matter.
--
Lars Ivar Igesund
blog at http://larsivi.net
DSource, #d.tango & #D: larsivi
Dancing the Tango
D2 isn't enough to say that all tools supports
D2, and so from the point D2 goes stable, it will be quite some time before
all/relevant tools are stable.
--
Lars Ivar Igesund
blog at http://larsivi.net
DSource, #d.tango & #D: larsivi
Dancing the Tango
34 matches
Mail list logo
