Piotrek wrote: > Hello! > > It's just an idea. After reading about issues on disallowing DWT to stay > in standardization area (Anomaly on Wiki4D GuiLibraries page) some > question appeared in my mind. For propaganda sake isn't it better to not > make such a big division between phobos and tango in the module naming? > Logically: > > phobos -> std > tango -> stdex (not tango -> tango)
Tango will stay Tango (and tango.*). The above naming assumes that Tango will depend on Phobos, and it will not. -- Lars Ivar Igesund blog at http://larsivi.net DSource, #d.tango & #D: larsivi Dancing the Tango
