Re: GCC 10.1 Released

On Thursday, 14 May 2020 at 16:57:20 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote: As of last week (7th May), GCC 10.1 has now been released. For the D language front-end, only a small number of incremental, but substantial changes have gone in. Most notable of the lot has been the addition of `static foreach`,

Re: Meson support for Mir and Lubeck

[ Replying to lots of stuff in one message - evil, I know... ;-) ] On Sunday, 9 September 2018 at 21:22:42 UTC, 9il wrote: On Sunday, 5 August 2018 at 02:36:29 UTC, Matthias Klumpp wrote: [...] Looks like that only betterC projects are good enough to become Debian packages. Generally

Re: GDC with D frontend 2.081.2

On Friday, 24 August 2018 at 08:50:22 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote: On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 10:40 AM Basile B. via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: [...] Great news. Best of luck for a wide adoption in the official package managers of the linux distributions.

Re: LDC 1.11.0

On Sunday, 19 August 2018 at 12:56:28 UTC, Matthias Klumpp wrote: [...] Does that Git has thing work if there is no Git involved? ;-) [...] Ewww, looks like I can't write today... At the moment, we get ``` LDC - the LLVM D compiler (1.8.0): based on DMD v2.078.3 and LLVM 5.0.2 built with

Re: LDC 1.11.0

On Sunday, 19 August 2018 at 12:48:15 UTC, kinke wrote: [...] The used host compiler, incl. git hash if untagged, can be found in the --version output: ``` LDC - the LLVM D compiler (1.12.0git-1c87fd7): based on DMD v2.082.0 and LLVM 6.0.0 built with LDC - the LLVM D compiler

Re: LDC 1.11.0

On Sunday, 19 August 2018 at 12:23:37 UTC, kinke wrote: On Saturday, 18 August 2018 at 21:05:42 UTC, Matthias Klumpp wrote: Will we get a release of the ltsmaster branch as well? From the release notes it sounds like building with a more recent version is a good idea... Using latest

Re: LDC 1.11.0

On Saturday, 18 August 2018 at 16:47:35 UTC, kinke wrote: Glad to announce LDC 1.11: * Based on D 2.081.2. * Prebuilt packages now using LLVM 6.0.1 and including additional cross-compilation targets (MIPS, MSP430, RISC-V and WebAssembly). * Rudimentary support for compiling & linking directly

Re: Dub support was added to Meson

On Friday, 10 August 2018 at 14:38:10 UTC, Russel Winder wrote: On Sat, 2018-08-04 at 16:07 +, Filipe Laíns via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: Hello, Dub support was finally merged to the Meson's upstream. For the ones that don't know, Meson[1] is a fast build system that uses ninja[2] as a

Re: Meson support for Mir and Lubeck

On Saturday, 4 August 2018 at 18:23:15 UTC, 9il wrote: [...] The packages have been tested in a real world project on OSX with `$ meson configure -Ddefault_library=static/`. [...] Hmm, shouldn't this be `meson --default-library=static ..`?

Re: Meson support for Mir and Lubeck

On Saturday, 4 August 2018 at 18:23:15 UTC, 9il wrote: The Meson Build system [13] support was added to the following Dub packages: asdf [1] - JSON serialisation library cblas [2] - CBLAS header for Dlang lapack [3] - LAPACK header for Dlang lubeck [4] - High level linear algebra library

Re: LDC 1.8.0

On Thursday, 29 March 2018 at 08:10:11 UTC, Martin Tschierschke wrote: On Saturday, 24 March 2018 at 17:33:18 UTC, Matthias Klumpp wrote: On Tuesday, 13 March 2018 at 01:52:48 UTC, Matthias Klumpp wrote: [...] Aww, just a little bit too late to easily get into Ubuntu 18.04 LTS Well It

Re: LDC 1.8.0

On Tuesday, 13 March 2018 at 01:52:48 UTC, Matthias Klumpp wrote: [...] Aww, just a little bit too late to easily get into Ubuntu 18.04 LTS Well It still made it, yay! (Even without me explicitly requesting it) This means Ubuntu 18.04 will be pretty up-to-date when it comes to D stuff,

Re: LDC 1.8.0

On Tuesday, 13 March 2018 at 10:27:49 UTC, kinke wrote: On Tuesday, 13 March 2018 at 01:52:48 UTC, Matthias Klumpp wrote: The new and enforced "-shared" suffixes for the druntime and phobos shared libraries are a bit annoying (especially since this is a breaking change), but at least at Debian

Re: LDC 1.8.0

On Sunday, 4 March 2018 at 22:37:21 UTC, kinke wrote: Hi everyone, on behalf of the LDC team, I'm glad to announce LDC 1.8. The highlights of this version in a nutshell: * Based on D 2.078.3. * New switch `-link-defaultlib-shared` to link against shared druntime/Phobos. Aww, just a little

Re: Released vibe.d 0.8.1

On Thursday, 31 August 2017 at 11:56:53 UTC, aberba wrote: On Wednesday, 30 August 2017 at 16:53:40 UTC, Matthias Klumpp wrote: On Wednesday, 30 August 2017 at 07:47:53 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote: Apart from removing the old vibe-d:diet package in favor of diet-ng, this release most notably

Re: Released vibe.d 0.8.1

On Wednesday, 30 August 2017 at 07:47:53 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote: Apart from removing the old vibe-d:diet package in favor of diet-ng, this release most notably contains a number of performance improvements in the HTTP server, as well as improvements and fixes in the WebSocket code.

Re: D support for the Meson build system

Btw, to make Meson and other build systems work really well, we would need this bug fixed in DMDFE: https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16746 At the moment, one needs to ninja clean way too often to get a good build.

Re: D support for the Meson build system

On Monday, 10 April 2017 at 18:11:44 UTC, Russel Winder wrote: [...] I'll look to ensuring my facts are correct, and then find out where to put an issue about this – I am assuming a GitHub repository with issues . Just file one at https://github.com/mesonbuild/meson/issues - it might even

Re: D support for the Meson build system

On Monday, 10 April 2017 at 15:27:25 UTC, Russel Winder wrote: On Mon, 2017-04-10 at 12:41 +, Matthias Klumpp via Digitalmars-d- announce wrote: […]. I am not buying the necessity of not-splitbuilding for optimizations yet. If that would be the case, how do optimizations work

Re: D support for the Meson build system

On Monday, 10 April 2017 at 12:10:41 UTC, Russel Winder wrote: On Mon, 2017-04-10 at 08:39 +, Atila Neves via Digitalmars-d- announce wrote: […] As far as I know the only build system that does this by default for D is reggae. I will be adding a new builder to the SCons D tools to do

Re: Terminix 1.4.0 Released

Congrats to the new release! Could you maybe delete or rename the 1.20 tag? And maybe also the 1.30 release? (see https://github.com/gnunn1/terminix/releases/tag/1.20 ) At least the tag messes up the new-release notifications at Debian, since 1.20 >> 1.4 Cheers, Matthias

Re: Simple GEdit .lang & github color scheme

On Wednesday, 24 August 2016 at 14:38:48 UTC, floare wrote: Dead link (dlang gedit color highlighting) http://reign-studios.com/d-downloads/d.lang.tar.gz Would you mind uploading on github for instance ? Also, if someone would simply update this with GNOMEs default color scheme, I could

Re: D support for the Meson build system

On Monday, 22 August 2016 at 01:34:36 UTC, jkpl wrote: On Sunday, 21 August 2016 at 19:08:59 UTC, Matthias Klumpp wrote: for a project like Terminix, dub with LDC builds in 8.6s, while Meson and ninja take only 6s here. Did you try to build with DUB but with WIFI or ethernet interface

Re: Terminix Stable 1.2.0 Released

On Saturday, 23 July 2016 at 17:00:45 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote: On 23 July 2016 at 16:24, Matthias Klumpp via Digitalmars-d-announce <digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: 3) Making LDC available for more architectures, or making GDC support a higher version of the Phobos st

Re: Terminix Stable 1.2.0 Released

On Saturday, 23 July 2016 at 11:40:20 UTC, qsdjlf wrote: [...] integration in distribution could be a good signal, what a say, Excellent signal, for the D language. I know that some people here are mostly starving at commercial usage...but for me such tools written in D and available in linux

Re: Adventures in D Programming

On Monday, 9 May 2016 at 09:29:36 UTC, qznc wrote: On Sunday, 8 May 2016 at 22:22:08 UTC, Peter Häggman wrote: [...] You've quoted the wrong part of the paragraph. The real problem he encountered was not the doc, it was the phobos bugs in the older version shipped with GDC/LDC: "For GDC,

Re: Official dub packages for Debian and Ubuntu

On Thursday, 21 April 2016 at 22:00:11 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: On Thursday, 21 April 2016 at 20:13:07 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: On Monday, 18 April 2016 at 21:54:43 UTC, Matthias Klumpp wrote: Unfortunately it FTBFSes... Hopefully we can get the patch for that in as well:

Re: Official dub packages for Debian and Ubuntu

On Monday, 18 April 2016 at 19:47:46 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: On Monday, 18 April 2016 at 16:57:27 UTC, Matthias Klumpp wrote: Freeze exception for LDC was approved last-minute, which means the final release will be in Xenial :-) That's fantastic, thank you very much for making

Re: Official dub packages for Debian and Ubuntu

On Tuesday, 12 April 2016 at 16:57:41 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: On Tuesday, 12 April 2016 at 01:58:13 UTC, Matthias Klumpp wrote: [...] I can ask, but given that the Xenial final freeze is on 24. April (release on 26.) and changing compiler versions that late in the cycle is

Re: Official dub packages for Debian and Ubuntu

On Friday, 15 April 2016 at 09:15:05 UTC, Johannes Pfau wrote: Am Thu, 14 Apr 2016 23:16:49 + schrieb Matthias Klumpp : On Thursday, 14 April 2016 at 17:46:55 UTC, Johannes Pfau wrote: > OSS projects do not use interface files though: It prevents > inlining of

Re: Official dub packages for Debian and Ubuntu

On Saturday, 16 April 2016 at 09:48:01 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: [..] As for further dub stuff, it is important that https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dub/issues/811 is addressed, so we can build software using dub without downloading stuff from the internet. Btw, since D

Re: Official dub packages for Debian and Ubuntu

On Thursday, 14 April 2016 at 17:46:55 UTC, Johannes Pfau wrote: [...] (1) Interface files We have .di interface files as a replacement for C/C++ headers (although the .di extension is only a convention, you can also use the .d extension). These files do not contain function bodies, but

Re: Official dub packages for Debian and Ubuntu

On Thursday, 14 April 2016 at 18:42:49 UTC, Jordi Sayol wrote: El 14/04/16 a les 17:54, Matthias Klumpp via Digitalmars-d-announce ha escrit: On Tuesday, 12 April 2016 at 13:28:29 UTC, Jordi Sayol wrote: [...] I think with "property" you mean "virtual package". See https:

Re: Official dub packages for Debian and Ubuntu

On Thursday, 14 April 2016 at 16:05:04 UTC, Matthias Klumpp wrote: On Tuesday, 12 April 2016 at 16:57:41 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: On Tuesday, 12 April 2016 at 01:58:13 UTC, Matthias Klumpp wrote: On Monday, 11 April 2016 at 21:58:55 UTC, Joseph Rushton [...] I can ask, but given

Re: Official dub packages for Debian and Ubuntu

On Tuesday, 12 April 2016 at 16:57:41 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: On Tuesday, 12 April 2016 at 01:58:13 UTC, Matthias Klumpp wrote: On Monday, 11 April 2016 at 21:58:55 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: Related note: I see the lcd version in xenial is 0.17.0~beta2 -- I don't suppose

Re: Official dub packages for Debian and Ubuntu

On Tuesday, 12 April 2016 at 07:03:44 UTC, Russel Winder wrote: [...] If the Debian ldc2 compiler is crashing on the same source that gdc compiles that sounds like a packaging problem. Or use of outdated D? ldc is generally much more up to date that gdc so shouldn't the order be ldc | gdc |

Re: Official dub packages for Debian and Ubuntu

On Tuesday, 12 April 2016 at 02:42:09 UTC, jmh530 wrote: On Monday, 11 April 2016 at 14:21:46 UTC, Matthias Klumpp wrote: On the roadmap are adding debhelper sequences to simplify packaging dub-based D code in Debian based distros, auto-test support in Debian's CI, and of course the usual

Re: Official dub packages for Debian and Ubuntu

On Monday, 11 April 2016 at 21:58:55 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: On Monday, 11 April 2016 at 14:21:46 UTC, Matthias Klumpp wrote: As part of that work, the dub package an build management system is now available in Debian, and I will ensure it works well. Additionally, it was possible

Re: Official dub packages for Debian and Ubuntu

On Monday, 11 April 2016 at 18:05:31 UTC, Jordi Sayol wrote: [...] Well, this makes useful have dub in both repositories, Debian/Ubuntu and d-apt. All Debian/Ubuntu users can always use dub on their system. If the last release is needed for any reason they can add d-apt repository to install

Re: Official dub packages for Debian and Ubuntu

On Monday, 11 April 2016 at 17:41:44 UTC, Matthias Klumpp wrote: [...] Eww, that's not something we can do for official packages - it's fine though for 3rd-party stuff :-) "can not do", obviously... :P

Re: Official dub packages for Debian and Ubuntu

things buildable only with DMD, which won't be found in any mainstream Linux distribution (no free software). On Monday, 11 April 2016 at 17:18:28 UTC, Jordi Sayol wrote: El 11/04/16 a les 16:21, Matthias Klumpp via Digitalmars-d-announce ha escrit: [...] Co-maintainers[1] and feedback from

Official dub packages for Debian and Ubuntu

Hello! I am very new to the D community and just recently finished a project in D, which I want to make available in Debian (reason for choosing D was mostly its speed and similarity to C++ and C, making a very shallow learning curve for someone knowing these languages. And porting Python