eed
> to for many of the basic cases. Then the simple cases won't have to use
> ranges just to do stuff like remove elements, and generic code and more
> complicated cases can use ranges as appropriate.
>
> But in general, while I do think that some polishing is needed for
I want to second Steven's suggestion that the code have a
template instantiation in it.
auto event = menlo!park(2013); ?
On Friday, 15 March 2013 at 21:13:42 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On 15 March 2013 21:07, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 3/15/13 2:37 PM, kraybit wrote:
On 3/15/13 19:09 , An
On Sunday, 10 February 2013 at 03:20:26 UTC, David Nadlinger
wrote:
That post is over a year old, and the point was precisely that
recent development activity seemed to contradict this statement.
The D Progamming Language book discusses this decision as well.
in D.
>
> I suggested that D be renamed the ADD language.
--
-=Miles Stoudenmire=-
miles.stoudenm...@gmail.com
estou...@uci.edu
http://itensor.org/miles/
ed to snipe like that I'd be
>> posting here several times a week on multiple topics. I don't.
>
> Would be great to also post when you feel you could help with something.
>
> Andrei
>
--
-=Miles Stoudenmire=-
miles.stoudenm...@gmail.com
