One problem with many applications is they are static once
compiled in the following sense:
There are apps that have certain behaviors that may be incomplete
are undesirable. Usually it could be that the designers used a
hard coded value for something when it would be better to have
made
On Saturday, 2 April 2016 at 15:43:53 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Hello all, I've created an Amazon Affiliates link for the D
Language Foundation (dlang-20). Subsequently I've changed
https://wiki.dlang.org/Books to use it. Please follow up with
changing dlang.org to also use the links,
On Tuesday, 8 March 2016 at 00:47:10 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Monday, 7 March 2016 at 20:54:22 UTC, Patience wrote:
On Monday, 7 March 2016 at 15:09:48 UTC, Lass Safin wrote:
On Monday, 7 March 2016 at 05:56:54 UTC, Patience wrote:
int[size] <- creates an integer of size bits.
You declare
On Monday, 7 March 2016 at 16:29:27 UTC, NX wrote:
On Monday, 7 March 2016 at 05:56:54 UTC, Patience wrote:
Just curious if anyone can see the use for them?
I believe 'new' keyword can take advantage of this quite good.
For example you can pass memory usage strategy like so:
MyClass mc =
On Monday, 7 March 2016 at 15:09:48 UTC, Lass Safin wrote:
On Monday, 7 March 2016 at 05:56:54 UTC, Patience wrote:
int[size] <- creates an integer of size bits.
You declare arrays of integers with int[size], you know that,
right?
No, not right. Think again. Get your mind out the gutter.
On Monday, 7 March 2016 at 00:19:07 UTC, Xinok wrote:
On Sunday, 6 March 2016 at 07:45:58 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
I think it would be better idea to just add the ability to add
unicode operators, and to avoid precedence issues one could
just require them to use parentheses. That way
Just curious if anyone can see the use for them?
e.g., for[32], switch[alpha] //alpha is a user type, if[x](x < 32)
etc..
The idea is two-fold, one is to allow polymorphic keyword
behavior(it's behavior depends on the argument) and to allow the
code itself to manipulate the behavior.
Of
On Thursday, 3 March 2016 at 00:27:39 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 3/2/2016 3:59 PM, Seb wrote:
I am just curious whether you have already considered moving
from Bugzilla to
the Github issue system and where your current opinion is.
1. Bugzilla is working famously for us.
Is it Kardashian
Ok, maybe not but this is what I mean:
Why can't we pass member as as sort of "objects" in there own
right to be used for accessing objects?
e.g.,
class A
{
int? foo;
A Parent;
T GetAncestorValue(member field) // member is a new keyword
{
var p = this;
while (!p &&
On Friday, 19 February 2016 at 22:34:22 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Friday, 19 February 2016 at 22:29:32 UTC, Patience wrote:
Is there anything in D like
https://irony.codeplex.com/
https://github.com/Hackerpilot/libdparse/
I don't want to parse d code. I want a generic parser that is
Is there anything in D like
https://irony.codeplex.com/
Photoshop has the ability to be controlled by scripts and
programming languages. For example, C# can be used to access
photoshop by adding the appropriate reference and using
directives. I believe it is COM based but I am not totally sure.
I've tried reading the docs but it's not making much
12 matches
Mail list logo
