On Friday, 10 February 2017 at 03:07:28 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Friday, 10 February 2017 at 02:53:50 UTC, Era Scarecrow
In cases like these i really wish the structure of the
class/struct had a hash or something (based on source or
struct layout or something)
They do have different full
On Wednesday, 1 February 2017 at 19:25:07 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
tl;dr - Seeking thoughts on trusting a system that allows
"handling" errors.
One of my extra-curricular interests is the Mill CPU[1]. A
recent discussion in that context reminded me of the
Error-Exception distinction in languag
Error Error: cannot append type int[] to type int[2][]
This is because I tried to slice too small [0..1] when I was
suppose to do [0..2](which passes). The error message is
deceiving because it makes it look like the append can't happen
when it can.
Should be something like
On Tuesday, 31 January 2017 at 15:21:42 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Tuesday, 31 January 2017 at 13:11:22 UTC, Profile Anaysis
wrote:
The web interface could use a little work!
1. Tabs - I know that tabs are designed to move to different
elements but you can override the default behavior
The web interface could use a little work!
1. Tabs - I know that tabs are designed to move to different
elements but you can override the default behavior and make life
quite a bit easier for most people(since most people have access
to a mouse).
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3362/captu
On Friday, 27 January 2017 at 11:16:09 UTC, Patrick Schluter
wrote:
On Thursday, 26 January 2017 at 00:02:03 UTC, Profile Anaysis
wrote:
[...]
It's funny (or sad) that C has compound types since C99 and
that they are good.
Your foo(|a,b,|c1,c2,3||,|e|,|f,g,c|) writes as
foo((T1){a,b,{c1,c2
On Friday, 27 January 2017 at 12:44:30 UTC, rjframe wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jan 2017 10:38:53 +, Profile Anaysis wrote:
Do you realize
1. That without change there can be no progress?
...
If people with your mentality rules the world we would still
be using
sticks and stones. This is a fact...
On Friday, 27 January 2017 at 19:32:29 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote:
On Thursday, 26 January 2017 at 00:02:03 UTC, Profile Anaysis
wrote:
Many times we pass compound types(non-primitives) as arguments
to functions.
I don't understand what issue you are solving. I see an
undefined syntax:
foo(|
On Friday, 27 January 2017 at 09:47:48 UTC, Bauss wrote:
On Thursday, 26 January 2017 at 00:02:03 UTC, Profile Anaysis
wrote:
Many times we pass compound types(non-primitives) as arguments
to functions.
[...]
This is going to be a no from me. It's just another syntactic
sugar that doesn't r
test1.obj : fatal error LNK1179: invalid or corrupt file:
duplicate COMDAT
'_D4main4mainFAAyaZ16__T3recVii1TAAiZ3recMFNfAAiZv (@safe void
main.main(immutable(char)[][]).rec!(1, int[][]).rec(int[][]))'
code
import std.stdio;
import std.traits, std.meta, std.conv, std.string, std.algorithm;
Why not make enum a comparable type to structs and classes?
They are static so they can't contain any mutable fields but
surely they can contain methods? And especially they should be
able to contain static methods!?
Many times we pass compound types(non-primitives) as arguments to
functions.
e.g.,
void foo(T1 t1, T2 t2, T3, t3);
But to call foo with new variables we have to create the
arguments. This usually requires extra code to simply initialize
the variables. (imagine foo being a constructor).
test.d(22): Error: cannot append type test.Path to type test.Path
This is due to the changing some code that was appending.
Obviously we can't append a type to itself.
Would be nice if the error message was more clear like:
Type test.Path is not an array. Cannot append to itself.
On Monday, 23 January 2017 at 01:46:58 UTC, FatalCatharsis wrote:
On Monday, 23 January 2017 at 00:46:30 UTC, Profile Anaysis
wrote:
The real issue is ambiguity. Any time you have a cycle you
must be able to get out of it and so your rules must be
organized so that one always checks to see if t
On Sunday, 22 January 2017 at 22:11:08 UTC, FatalCatharsis wrote:
I'm writing a flex lexer for D and I've hit a roadblock. It is
almost working EXCEPT for one specific production.
StringLiteral is cyclic and I don't know how to approach it. It
is cyclic because:
Token -> StringLiteral -
15 matches
Mail list logo
