On Wednesday, 15 August 2012 at 14:36:00 UTC, José Armando
García Sancio wrote:
Some people's point is that MD5 was consider a cryptographic
digest
function 16 years ago. It is not consider cryptographically
secure
today. So why make any design assumption today on how the
landscape
will look
On Wednesday, 15 August 2012 at 01:22:41 UTC, Era Scarecrow wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 August 2012 at 00:37:32 UTC, ReneSac wrote:
And my last question of my first post: I can't use auto for
the out values right? An enhancement proposal like this
would be compatible with D?
I would say
Thanks, this indeed works. One obvious (when your program
starts to behave weirdly...) down side of this solution: it needs
a different dummy for each optional out value of a function, or
else multiple variables will be modifying the same dummy.
And, of course, a different dummy for each type
On Tuesday, 24 July 2012 at 05:30:49 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
The options that I can think of:
- Return a struct (or a class) where one of the members is not
filled-in
- Similarly, return a tuple
This is awkward, and doesn't look good for performance.
- Use an out parameter, which can
How I can return multiple values in D, but one of them being
optional? I tried the 'out' hack to achieve multiple return
values, but it didn't accepted a default argument: it needed a
lvalue in the calling function.
In Lua, for example, one can do:
function foo(input)
-- calculations --
On Monday, 16 April 2012 at 07:28:25 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
Are you on linux/windows/mac?
Windows.
My main question is now *WHY* D is slower than C++ in this
program? The code is identical (even the same C functions) in the
performance-critical parts, I'm using the same compiler backend
On Monday, 16 April 2012 at 22:58:08 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 04/17/2012 12:24 AM, ReneSac wrote:
Windows.
DMC runtime !
DMC = Digital Mars Compiler? Does Mingw/GDC uses that? I think
that both, g++ and GDC compiled binaries, use the mingw runtime,
but I'm not sure also
On Sunday, 15 April 2012 at 02:56:21 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
wrote:
On Saturday, 14 April 2012 at 19:51:21 UTC, Joseph Rushton
Wakeling wrote:
GDC has all the regular gcc optimization flags available
IIRC. The ones on the
GDC man page are just the ones specific to GDC.
I'm not talking
I have this simple binary arithmetic coder in C++ by Mahoney and
translated to D by Maffi. I added notrow, final and pure
and GC.disable where it was possible, but that didn't made much
difference. Adding const to the Predictor.p() (as in the C++
version) gave 3% higher performance. Here the
I tested the q66 version in my computer (sandy bridge @ 4.3GHz).
Repeating the old timmings here, and the new results are marked
as D-v2:
test.fpaq0 (16562521 bytes) - test.bmp (33159254 bytes)
Lang| Comp | Binary size | Time (lower is better)
C++ (g++) - 13kb - 2.42s (100%) -O3
On Saturday, 7 April 2012 at 06:21:16 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
On 07.04.2012 8:51, ReneSac wrote:
The only thing I noticed is that a simple Hello World took
several
seconds to compile, and ended up with 1.25MB (release,
non-debug build)!
how about strip it?
+ MinGW debug info
On Saturday, 7 April 2012 at 22:21:36 UTC, Jonas wrote:
5) What's wrong with this program? Is it that `printf` doesn't
understand D strings? If so, how do I use D strings in string
formatting?
import std.stdio;
string foo() { return foobar; }
int main() {
printf(%s\n, foo());
return
On Friday, 6 April 2012 at 01:33:10 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
DMD runs just fine on 64-bit Windows.
Then why 32 bit Windows (Win32) operating system, such as
Windows XP is put as a requirement? This should be corrected:
http://dlang.org/dmd-windows.html
Anyway, in the mean time I have setup
On Thursday, 5 April 2012 at 18:34:05 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote:
You'll be pretty safe using features you know for C, but you
can venture out pretty far from it.
While, the page isn't specific to the questions you have at
hand, this does cover much of the current state. Remember,
recently
On Thursday, 5 April 2012 at 22:07:05 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote:
On Thursday, 5 April 2012 at 21:10:41 UTC, ReneSac wrote:
I will probably program close to C/Lua style (the languages
I'm most proficient with), but pretty far is vague. And I
haven't been following the time line of the feature
15 matches
Mail list logo
