On Sunday, 13 December 2015 at 22:32:43 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko
wrote:
Since it's a segfault in the compiler, should I put it on
Bugzilla too?
Yes
1. Please note in Bugzilla report that program code is
incorrect (see example of correct above).
2. More reduced code can be used for report:
void
On Friday, 11 December 2015 at 22:56:15 UTC, Ilya wrote:
On Friday, 11 December 2015 at 19:31:14 UTC, Stefan Frijters
wrote:
[...]
Slice!(N, T*) arr;
[...]
// compute length
// more flexible construtors would be added after
// allocatrs support for ndslice
On Sunday, 13 December 2015 at 15:59:19 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko
wrote:
Could you please post reduced code example that caused dmd to
segfault?
Took dustmite about 6 hours to reduce, and then I went at it
manually for a bit, so this is the smallest I could get it:
import
Today I've made an abortive attempt at replacing my code's [1]
dependence on unstd.multidimarray [2] with ndslice.
I'm guessing it's just me being stupid, but could anyone supply
with some hints on how to do the conversion with a minimum of
fuss?
Basically I have an N-dimensional array (N is
On Sunday, 9 August 2015 at 20:24:22 UTC, Alexei Bykov wrote:
D has builtin support for coverage analysis but it produces
only .lst files. This is a bit inconvenient. Is there any tool
which can create something like an html report from .lst files?
For now I'm using OpenCppCoverage which is not
I have a code which does a lot of work on 2D/3D arrays, for which
I use the 2.066 multidimensional slicing syntax through a fork of
the Unstandard package [1].
Many times the order of operations doesn't matter and I thought I
would give the parallelism module a try to try and get some easy
On Sunday, 19 April 2015 at 07:13:16 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
Hi,
GCC-5.1 has hit RC, and so it's all rush again to get bug fixes
in
quick before the window closes.
Packages are up on Debian:
https://packages.debian.org/experimental/gdc-5
Latest changes however are on github:
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 09:42:44 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
On 22/03/2015 10:29 p.m., Stefan Frijters wrote:
So I was trying to add some attributes to unittests in my
code, but
apparently they are only allowed *before* the unittest
keyword, which I
think makes it much harder to quickly
So I was trying to add some attributes to unittests in my code,
but apparently they are only allowed *before* the unittest
keyword, which I think makes it much harder to quickly see the
unittests when scrolling through the code:
void foo() @safe pure nothrow @nogc { } // Ok - I normally use
So this is a strange thing I ran into while trying to streamline
some templates in my code, where fixed-length arrays are passed
as runtime arguments. I started out by trying variant fun2(),
which disappointingly didn't work. fun3() then did its job but I
was suspicious and tried fun4() and
On Tuesday, 3 March 2015 at 14:40:45 UTC, anonymous wrote:
On Tuesday, 3 March 2015 at 13:42:09 UTC, Stefan Frijters wrote:
So this is a strange thing I ran into while trying to
streamline some templates in my code, where fixed-length
arrays are passed as runtime arguments. I started out
On Monday, 23 February 2015 at 22:20:50 UTC, Arjan wrote:
On Monday, 23 February 2015 at 21:07:04 UTC, George Sapkin
wrote:
Seems like there are some local meetups starting across the
globe, but no Dutch one so far. Are there any D users from the
Netherlands that would want to meetup and share
Recently I've hooked my code up to coveralls.io using the
convenient doveralls[1]. At first, I just did a dub test command
before sending the data to coveralls, but my simulation code also
has runnable tests in addition to unittests, which reaches many
more lines.
Today I've added an option
So recently I ran into this discrepancy between the behaviour of
dmd (and gdc) and ldc2:
void test(int[] data)
in { assert(data, data must be non-null.); }
body { }
void main() {
import std.stdio;
int[1] data1;
writeln(data1); // [0]
test(data1); // Passes
assert(data1.ptr !is
On Sunday, 1 February 2015 at 14:54:37 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Sun, 01 Feb 2015 14:42:31 +, Stefan Frijters wrote:
It does not seem to say whether a zero-length array should
have a valid
address or not.
i believe that zero-length array should not be `null`, as it's
infinitely small, yet
Currently I'm using dub for the first time and I've run into two
problems so far.
1) I have defined buildTypes in dub.json, as well as subPackages.
However, I want to always build all subPackages in release mode,
regardless of the --build option I'm using to build the main
program. I'm not
On Sunday, 28 September 2014 at 04:24:25 UTC, Joel wrote:
I'm trying to make a multidimensional array. I feel I've tried
every thing. Is there a good guide explaining it?
struct Spot { bool dot; }
spots = new Spot[][](800,600);
assert(spots[800-1][600-1].dot, Out of bounds);
You
Should this be possible? I admit to not being fully clear on the
way delegates are handled, but maybe someone can shed some light?
As an example I use a snippet Ali uses to demonstrate opApply:
struct NumberRange {
int begin;
int end;
int opApply(int delegate(ref int) @nogc operations)
On Sunday, 24 August 2014 at 14:34:03 UTC, bearophile wrote:
ketmar:
but i tend not to fill enhancement requests without
corresponding patches,
I agree that having a patch ready is much better. But people
like me file hundreds of ERs without too much damage done, and
many of them get
On Sunday, 24 August 2014 at 18:55:09 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 11:45:14 -0700
Ali Çehreli via Digitalmars-d-learn
digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com
wrote:
Yeah, the only reason why the original code does not work is
the
write() expression in the foreach
The simplified signatures would be show for the main
signatures, i.e. the ones with a light blue background, and the
full signatures would be added at the end of the documentation
for each symbol.
I like it. Some of my code also features a lot of free functions
with template constraints and
On Wednesday, 6 August 2014 at 08:48:25 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
Is there anywhere that describes what Kenji (it was Kenji
wasn't it?) recently implemented for this?
Not what you asked for, but maybe useful nonetheless: Denis
Shelomovskij has written a multidimensional array implementation
On Thursday, 26 June 2014 at 02:33:43 UTC, Mathias LANG wrote:
On Wednesday, 25 June 2014 at 18:49:27 UTC, Stefan Frijters
wrote:
Let me preface this by admitting that I'm not sure I'm using
the DDoc functionality properly at all, so let me know if my
questions are bogus.
Is it possible
.
Any tips to achieve this in a different fashion are also
appreciated.
Kind regards,
Stefan Frijters
On Tuesday, 10 June 2014 at 19:04:18 UTC, Stefan Frijters wrote:
I've been using the multidimensional arrays for a while now,
but recently I've run into a problem w.r.t. optimization:
import std.stdio;
import unstd.multidimarray;
void main() {
MultidimArray!(double, 3) arr;
arr
for my HPC test
code, and I have not noticed any deleterious effects; would you
accept a pull request to fix these?
Kind regards,
Stefan Frijters
: incompatible types for ((dfoo) * (ibar[])):
'double' and 'int[]'
Is this by design? It was very surprising to me, especially since
all other combinations do seem to work.
Kind regards,
Stefan Frijters
On Wednesday, 21 May 2014 at 13:52:47 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
Please file a bug, there's no reason for that not to work, it
just needs to be implemented properly.
Ok, thanks for confirming. Filed as
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12780 .
On Wednesday, 21 May 2014 at 17:07:27 UTC, Francesco Cattoglio
wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 May 2014 at 13:52:47 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 May 2014 at 11:45:57 UTC, Stefan Frijters
wrote:
I would have expected the last case to work as well, but I get
testarr.d(20): Error
aggregate false
// testattr
}
Any hints would be appreciated!
Kind regards,
Stefan Frijters
On Friday, 9 May 2014 at 12:19:12 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Friday, 9 May 2014 at 11:53:59 UTC, Stefan Frijters wrote:
I've been playing with UDAs a bit and I wanted to find all
variables with a particular attribute in various modules. I
thought I had it cracked, until I added a module
On Monday, 17 March 2014 at 17:39:41 UTC, Denis Shelomovskij
wrote:
Multidimensional arrays indexing and slicing syntax is finally
added [1] (thanks to Kenji Hara). So it was a good cause to
update my multidimensional arrays library implementation and
add support for the new syntax. So here we
On Wednesday, 16 October 2013 at 07:52:44 UTC, Andrew wrote:
andrew@islay:~/dub$ ./build.sh
Generating version file...
Running gdmd...
/usr/local/gdc/include/d/4.8.2/armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf/core/time.di:224:
error: this cannot be interpreted at compile time, because it
has no
On Wednesday, 16 October 2013 at 09:11:16 UTC, Andrew wrote:
As far as I know deimos is a set of official (?) bindings for
common C libraries. I don't know dub's build process but I
assume that if the build script would have worked for you it
would have attempted to clone this repo
On Wednesday, 16 October 2013 at 19:18:53 UTC, Andrew wrote:
I'm a very happy man ! Everything is built and working
including dub and the http_server example from vibe.d.
It's slow to build, but it executes quickly and strips down to
about 3MB which is heavy but tolerable.
Thanks to
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 at 14:56:06 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 at 14:38:32 UTC, Andrew wrote:
Is this something I can update easily ?
If rebuilding GDC from sources so that it will catch 2.063.2
frontend version is an option - it may help.
Looking at
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 at 19:23:13 UTC, Andrew wrote:
2060L - seems I'm further advanced than everybody else :-)
Sorry, I thought it was 2.052, but now I see it's well behind
since it should be 2.063. I'm rebuilding again from the master.
Aha, oops, I have the same 2060L, but that is
On Monday, 14 October 2013 at 07:36:03 UTC, Andrew wrote:
Thanks Stefan, those were the instructions that I tried.
With GDC, is it possible to generate portable intermediate C
code so that I can compile D sources on the Mac and then just
copy the resultant C code to an ARM debian machine and
On Friday, 11 October 2013 at 07:09:17 UTC, Andrew wrote:
As Adam already said D on Pi is adventurous.
For MongoDB and web stuff, you should look into Vibe.d [0].
For parsing I would suggest Pegged [1].
Welcome to D and Happy Hacking! :)
[0] http://vibed.org/
[1]
On Wednesday, 9 October 2013 at 08:30:11 UTC, Denis Shelomovskij
wrote:
09.10.2013 7:55, Nick B пишет:
On Tuesday, 8 October 2013 at 17:26:46 UTC, Stefan Frijters
wrote:
andrei wrote:
I too are interesteed in this area as well. Dennis do you only
plan to
focus on multidimensional arrays only
On Tuesday, 8 October 2013 at 14:41:47 UTC, Denis Shelomovskij
wrote:
I accidentally discovered Andrei wrote [1] multidimensional
array implementation is needed. If it really is, I will work to
revise the API and prepare my implementation [2] for review if
nobody is doing it already.
Also as
41 matches
Mail list logo
