On Tue, 09 Jun 2009 16:22:39 -0400, bearophile wrote:
> Once the language tells apart arrays and slices, the arrays may have a
> third field that represents the capacity, and the slices may have a
> third field that represents the stride (that defaults to 1).
No, please no! Do I really need to c
On Sun, 07 Jun 2009 19:52:05 -0400, HOSOKAWA Kenchi wrote:
> Steve Schveighoffer Wrote:
>
>
>> f_twice can be a template:
>>
>> void f_twice()(int i) { f(i); f(i); }
>>
>> It's pretty much exactly what you want. It should even work without
>>
On Sun, 07 Jun 2009 17:58:30 -0400, HOSOKAWA Kenchi wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> Interface member functions do not have implementations. This
> specification prevents to implement macro-like small functions which
> won't be overridden. It seems that interfaces are possible to have
> function implementa
On Mon, 08 Jun 2009 00:34:10 +0400, Denis Koroskin wrote:
> On Sun, 07 Jun 2009 15:47:52 +0400, Steve Schveighoffer
> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 06 Jun 2009 21:59:39 -0700, Sean Kelly wrote:
>>
>>> Steve Schveighoffer wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 06
On Sat, 06 Jun 2009 21:59:39 -0700, Sean Kelly wrote:
> Steve Schveighoffer wrote:
>> On Sat, 06 Jun 2009 12:03:03 -0700, Sean Kelly wrote:
>>
>>> bearophile wrote:
>>>> Sean Kelly:
>>>>> Particularly in D2 where append
>>>>> o
On Sat, 06 Jun 2009 12:03:03 -0700, Sean Kelly wrote:
> bearophile wrote:
>> Sean Kelly:
>>> Particularly in D2 where append
>>> operations on arrays are probably less common as a result of string
>>> being invariant.
>>
>> They aren't much common maybe because they are currently dead-slow.
>> Ap
On Sat, 06 Jun 2009 10:57:08 -0700, Brad Roberts wrote:
> Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
>> On Sat, 06 Jun 2009 09:35:15 -0400, Christopher Wright
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Kristian Kilpi wrote:
I think I shouldn't post this because I could very well start one of
those mega-threads... :D
Of
On Sat, 06 Jun 2009 11:26:37 -0400, Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 11:17 AM, Steven
> Schveighoffer wrote:
>>>
>>> You need to do escape analysis and whole program analysis to determine
>>> whether there are aliases to a scope member. Failing that, it's pretty
>>> easy to intr
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 08:07:52 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> It looks we can't make it with only T[]. We need a genuine container
> type, and T[new] was suggested. It would probably have value semantics.
>
> T[U] seems to have the same problem. If T[U] is the range, then how do
> you call the
On Sun, 08 Mar 2009 17:24:09 -0700, Walter Bright wrote:
> Derek Parnell wrote:
>> I know that a better way to code this example would have been to use
>> the .idup functionality, but that is not the point. I relied on the
>> compiler ensuring that everything declared as immutable would not be
>>
On Sat, 07 Mar 2009 22:44:48 -0500, Jason House wrote:
> The ugly const thread got me thinking about the old problem of returning
> an input while preserving const safety. I have an idea that seems
> reasonable...
I agree, it's very reasonable. That's why I created an enhancement
bugzilla for
On Wed, 04 Mar 2009 13:55:10 -0800, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> bearophile wrote:
>> Andrei Alexandrescu:
>>> Binary search is rather common.
>>
>> Oh, yes, sorry, I meant among the ones you have listed there...
>
> Of five, three are frequent (linear, binary, Boyer-Moore), one is a form
> of s
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 05:43:06 +, John Reimer wrote:
> Hello Steve,
>
>> On Sun, 15 Feb 2009 17:01:49 +, John Reimer wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Steve,
>>>
This is the same kind of attitude, John, that brought about the death
of Alan Turing.
>>> That's a strong accusation, Steve,
On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:36:52 -0800, Sean Kelly wrote:
> Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>
>> I totally agree. The useful spec of std.file.read should be "reads the
>> file to exhaustion in a buffer and returns it"
>
> Okay, that's a fair definition. So the correct behavior for reading an
> unbounde
On Sun, 15 Feb 2009 20:30:06 -0800, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> Steve Schveighoffer wrote:
>> On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 12:20:34 +0900, Bill Baxter wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Steve Schveighoffer
>>> wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 15 Feb 2
On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 12:20:34 +0900, Bill Baxter wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Steve Schveighoffer
> wrote:
>> On Sun, 15 Feb 2009 17:27:38 -0800, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>
>>> Ok. Let me just note that rand()%max is a lousy method of generating
>&
On Sun, 15 Feb 2009 17:27:38 -0800, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> Ok. Let me just note that rand()%max is a lousy method of generating
> random numbers between 0 and max-1 and everybody should put that in the
> bin with Popular Examples That Should Never Be Used, together with
> exponential Fibonac
On Sun, 15 Feb 2009 17:01:49 +, John Reimer wrote:
> Hello Steve,
>
>> This is the same kind of attitude, John, that brought about the death
>> of Alan Turing.
>
>
> That's a strong accusation, Steve, without knowing me; it's a very hasty
> reduction for circumstances, personalities, and fa
On Sun, 15 Feb 2009 15:42:17 -0800, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> BCS wrote:
>> Hello Andrei,
>>
>>> Let me add one too: there/their.
>>>
>>> Andrei
>>>
>>>
>> Oops :(
>> I don't /think/ I'm dyslexic :b
>>
>>
>>
> That lysdexia is a killer isn't it :o).
>
> Andrei
dyslexics of the world untie
On Sat, 14 Feb 2009 19:10:05 +, John Reimer wrote:
> Hello bearophile,
>
>> (And my name is bearophile, thank you).
>>
>> Bye,
>> bearophile
>
>
> For those that see this as flamebait, I request that you do not respond.
> I just felt somebody had to say something about this. If this is
>
On Sat, 14 Feb 2009 14:11:10 +0300, Denis Koroskin wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Feb 2009 14:04:36 +0300, Walter Bright
> wrote:
>
>> Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>> auto big = uniform(rng, uint.max / 2, uint.max);
>>> If the interval is open I can't generate uint.max.
>>
>>
>> auto big = uniform(rng, uin
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 17:10:29 -0800, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> 2. The global random generator will be allocated per thread. Are you
> cool with this too?
Good idea. Random number generators should not require locking in the
most common case.
>
> 3. How should the global rng be initialized?
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 16:45:21 -0800, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
>> Average runtime is still going to be O(n^2), because the average
>> element chosen should be k / 2 elements into the range.
>
> So at some point there are k slots for grabs out of n. The number of
> st
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 21:51:01 -0500, Justin wrote:
> Is there a way to "find" a classinfo for such a class at runtime?
I can't see anything incorrect about what you are doing. Certainly the
source for druntime seems to indicate it should work.
This is probably a compiler bug.
-Steve
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 14:41:26 +0300, Denis Koroskin wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 07:46:31 +0300, Andrei Alexandrescu
> wrote:
>> Wait, I take that back. I don't know of solid ways to sort into a copy
>> or shuffle into a copy. For shuffling I'd need auxiliary memory (in
>> addition to the copy its
On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:58:38 -0500, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>
> // Ok, Windows is a built-in version declared by the language or
> compiler. // Note that on non-Windows platforms, // the "Windows"
> version would still exist, // but it would just be set to false.
> version(Windows)...
>
This won'
On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:01:29 +0100, Don wrote:
> I think I have a solution to the versioning problems. My belief is that
> version statements are fine, and Walter's 'rats nest' argument is valid.
> Instead, I believe that version declarations limited to "version = XXX;"
> are too weak. They also h
On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 05:43:48 +, Steve Schveighoffer wrote:
> What I mean by
> expanded if statements is that you are making me expand:
>
> if(a || b)
> statement;
>
> into
>
> bool aorb = false;
> if(a)
> aorb = true;
> if(b)
> aorb = true;
&
On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 19:28:46 -0800, Walter Bright wrote:
> Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
>> That example has nothing to do with || being allowed, and nothing to do
>> with your exhibit B. Your simple example makes sense to split into
>> multiple files, but you simply waved your magic "split into mu
On Sat, 06 Dec 2008 11:21:11 -0500, Jerry wrote:
> toString() doesn't work inside a class member function.
>
> import std.string;
> class A {
> void f() {
> string s = toString(5);
> }
> }
>
> This errors with junk.d(19): function object.Object.toString () does not
> match parameter type
30 matches
Mail list logo
