On Monday, 17 March 2014 at 14:07:13 UTC, Johannes Pfau wrote:
I'm happy to announce the first GDC ARM beta on behalf of the
GDC
team :)
ARM support is now at a point where the automated tests (test
suite,
unit tests) pass and we're ready for feedback from real world
usage.
All changes have
On Monday, 17 February 2014 at 06:40:54 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Sunday, 16 February 2014 at 23:40:58 UTC, 1100110 wrote:
On 2/16/14, 10:18, Elie Morisse wrote:
IMHO an approach that would not involve making a binary
choice between
full D and minimal D is to add an option to make the
On Sunday, 16 February 2014 at 16:18:13 UTC, Elie Morisse wrote:
On Thursday, 13 February 2014 at 23:14:20 UTC, 1100110 wrote:
I think it's about time I gave back to this wonderful
community.
I'm offering a $50 bounty on this.
(Preferably Bitcoins, but I'll use bountysource if desired.)
On Tuesday, 11 February 2014 at 19:43:00 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
I've toyed with this idea for a while, and wondered what the
interest there is in something like this.
The idea is to be able to use a subset of D that does not
require any of druntime or phobos - it can be linked merely
with
On Thursday, 13 February 2014 at 19:47:33 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
Am 13.02.2014 19:06, schrieb inout:
On Tuesday, 11 February 2014 at 19:43:00 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
I've toyed with this idea for a while, and wondered what the
interest
there is in something like this.
The idea
On Monday, 10 February 2014 at 01:16:27 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Sunday, February 09, 2014 21:57:13 Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
Split out of List of Phobos functions that allocate memory?.
To reiterate, here is some critique, compiled:
1. Exceptions are class instances, hence (by default)
On Wednesday, 29 January 2014 at 07:02:00 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
On 1/28/14 4:14 PM, bearophile wrote:
This is not an enhancement request, but it presents a potential
enhancement.
This is C++11 code:
templateint... digits struct value;
template struct value {
static const int v
On Friday, 17 January 2014 at 02:52:15 UTC, bearophile wrote:
deadalnix:
Most object don't have a sensible init value. That is just
hiding the problem under the carpet.
If there's desire to solve this problem I think that improving
the type system to avoid nulls where they are not desired
On Tuesday, 17 December 2013 at 21:28:35 UTC, John J wrote:
On 12/16/2013 01:38 AM, Dfr wrote:
Sorry for posting it here, but this is really issue for me.
This forum
is cool and works very fast, but often it kinda overloaded ?
Sometimes
pages are opening very slow or 502 Gateway timeout error
On Wednesday, 4 December 2013 at 23:14:48 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
Hello,
Walter and I were talking about eliminating the surreptitious
allocations in buildPath:
http://dlang.org/phobos/std_path.html#.buildPath
We'd need to keep the existing version working, so we're
looking at
On Monday, 25 November 2013 at 13:01:43 UTC, Simen Kjærås wrote:
On 2013-11-25 13:00, Marco Leise wrote:
Am Fri, 22 Nov 2013 02:55:44 +0100
schrieb Simen Kjærås simen.kja...@gmail.com:
On 22.11.2013 00:50, Meta wrote:
On Thursday, 21 November 2013 at 22:51:43 UTC, inout wrote:
What if you
on.
May I suggest:
struct Validated(alias fn, T) {
private T value;
@property inout
T get() {
return value;
}
}
Validated!(fn, T) validate(alias fn, T)(T value) {
Validated!(fn, T) result;
fn(value);
result.value = value;
return result;
}
void
On Thursday, 21 November 2013 at 17:19:18 UTC, inout wrote:
On Thursday, 21 November 2013 at 07:22:39 UTC, Steve Teale
wrote:
import std.stdio;
enum Intention
{
EVIL,
NEUTRAL,
GOOD,
SAINTLY
}
void foo(Intention rth)
{
if (rth == EVIL)
writeln(Road to hell);
}
void main
On Thursday, 21 November 2013 at 07:22:39 UTC, Steve Teale wrote:
import std.stdio;
enum Intention
{
EVIL,
NEUTRAL,
GOOD,
SAINTLY
}
void foo(Intention rth)
{
if (rth == EVIL)
writeln(Road to hell);
}
void main()
{
foo(EVIL);
}
Why does the compiler complain in both
On Friday, 8 November 2013 at 12:49:38 UTC, bearophile wrote:
This is something that has come out of a thread I have opened
in D.learn.
In the thread qznc has answered me:
Operator precedence of . is higher than unary minus.
That's right:
double foo(in double x) {
assert (x = 0);
On Tuesday, 29 October 2013 at 21:59:38 UTC, Joseph Rushton
Wakeling wrote:
On 29/10/13 15:58, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
Can't it use ref-counted COW? Then since there is only 1
reference to the
original block it may mutate it in-place else it creates new
chunk with refs=1
and decrements the
On Thursday, 24 October 2013 at 19:53:56 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Hello,
I know it's been a long wait. Hopefully it was worth it. The
alpha release of untyped allocators is ready for tire-kicking
and a test drive.
Code:
On Sunday, 20 October 2013 at 12:16:14 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
It's a pretty useful tool after all (and it's strange how many
people
don't even know it exists, judging from IRC conversations). It's
already in the tools repo.
The issue is filed as:
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 at 23:20:39 UTC, Sean Kelly wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 at 22:09:17 UTC, Robert wrote:
The problem is that destructors and thus the registered hooks
for the dispose events are called when threads are already
resumed. If this wasn't the case there would
On Thursday, 10 October 2013 at 08:55:00 UTC, Robert Schadek
wrote:
On 10/10/2013 03:45 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
Rainer Schuetze wrote:
You have to put the lock around the pair of AddRef and
Release, but if
the compiler already splits this into two function calls, this
cannot
be done in the
20 matches
Mail list logo
