Re: Program logic bugs vs input/environmental errors

2014-10-20 Thread rst256 via Digitalmars-d
On Saturday, 18 October 2014 at 17:55:04 UTC, Walter Bright wrote: On 10/18/2014 9:01 AM, Sean Kelly wrote: So you consider the library interface to be user input? The library designer has to make that decision, not the language. What about calls that are used internally but also exposed a

Re: Program logic bugs vs input/environmental errors

2014-10-20 Thread rst256 via Digitalmars-d
On Monday, 20 October 2014 at 20:36:58 UTC, eles wrote: On Saturday, 18 October 2014 at 17:40:43 UTC, Walter Bright wrote: On 10/18/2014 8:21 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote: On 2014-10-18 07:09, Walter Bright wrote: Which means they'll be program bugs, not environmental errors. Yes, but just beca

Re: Program logic bugs vs input/environmental errors

2014-10-21 Thread rst256 via Digitalmars-d
On Tuesday, 21 October 2014 at 03:25:55 UTC, rst256 wrote: In this post i forgot make correction machine translation. I am so sorry! On Monday, 20 October 2014 at 20:36:58 UTC, eles wrote: On Saturday, 18 October 2014 at 17:40:43 UTC, Walter Bright wrote: On 10/18/2014 8:21 AM, Jacob Carlborg w

Re: Program logic bugs vs input/environmental errors

2014-10-22 Thread rst256 via Digitalmars-d
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code_smell Do you read this? Yes phobos.stdio very smell code. Disagree? 107 КБ of source code olny for call few functions from stdio. Are you sure that this code are full correctly? "silly rabbit, y should be positive" - may be becose his used class like this? the

Re: Who pays for all this?

2014-10-22 Thread rst256 via Digitalmars-d
On Tuesday, 7 October 2014 at 01:11:42 UTC, Shammah Chancellor wrote: On 2014-10-06 22:28:52 +, Andrei Alexandrescu said: On 10/6/14, 12:59 PM, Shammah Chancellor wrote: I'm willing to put in the work if Walter is on board also. I don't want to do all that work to end up being a DPL Found

Re: Program logic bugs vs input/environmental errors

2014-10-23 Thread rst256 via Digitalmars-d
in the extreme case, if you want to change anything. or as a way to shut problem quickly add to debugging symbols generation algorithm info about file and line - Walter?

Re: Array bound checks removal increasing importance

2014-10-26 Thread rst256 via Digitalmars-d
On Saturday, 31 May 2014 at 23:30:41 UTC, Walter Bright wrote: On 5/31/2014 4:06 PM, "Nordlöw" wrote: I've looked around in DMD for a suitable place to add checks for this but haven't found the spot where range-check is injected. Help anyone? There isn't a suitable place. To make it work, dat

Re: Algorithms to solve programming contest problems

2014-10-26 Thread rst256 via Digitalmars-d
On Saturday, 25 October 2014 at 20:51:04 UTC, Walter Bright wrote: http://www.quora.com/What-are-the-algorithms-required-to-solve-all-problems-using-C++-in-any-competitive-coding-contest Anyone want to review these and see what we should add to Phobos? Dear Mr. Bright. Just can not now comme

Re: Algorithms to solve programming contest problems

2014-10-27 Thread rst256 via Digitalmars-d
On Sunday, 26 October 2014 at 20:58:39 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote: On 10/26/2014 02:37 AM, Vic wrote: JRE has Oracle and 100 devs, CLR has MS and 100 dec, there are 7 for D, and it should be narrow, like LUA. It should have 7% of their platform. Majority of scared cows must be killed, the sooner l

Re: C++ developer choices in open source projects

2014-10-29 Thread rst256 via Digitalmars-d
On Wednesday, 29 October 2014 at 22:40:33 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote: Am 29.10.2014 um 23:27 schrieb eles: On Wednesday, 29 October 2014 at 22:03:52 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote: Am 29.10.2014 um 17:05 schrieb Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d: On Wed, 2014-10-29 at 15:09 +, eles via Digitalmars-d wro

Re: C++ developer choices in open source projects

2014-10-30 Thread rst256 via Digitalmars-d
On Thursday, 30 October 2014 at 08:03:30 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote: On Thursday, 30 October 2014 at 04:51:33 UTC, rst256 wrote: On Wednesday, 29 October 2014 at 22:40:33 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote: Am 29.10.2014 um 23:27 schrieb eles: On Wednesday, 29 October 2014 at 22:03:52 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote: