On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 15:13:51 -0500, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"Steven Schveighoffer" wrote in message
news:op.u9g0qne2eav...@localhost.localdomain...
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 14:40:14 -0500, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Of course, this is all on XP, Outlook Express v6.00.x. For all I know
they
may have
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
OE (at least as of the last time I used it) is much worse than TB, no
question about that. One simple matter - you can't archive messages
without using the mouse. As bad as Thunderbird is, it is way more
productive than OE.
What drove me away from OE was the inabili
"Steven Schveighoffer" wrote in message
news:op.u9g0qne2eav...@localhost.localdomain...
> On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 14:40:14 -0500, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>
>
>> Of course, this is all on XP, Outlook Express v6.00.x. For all I know
>> they
>> may have changed things for Vista or 7 (although, after ha
"Andrei Alexandrescu" wrote in message
news:hne5tf$f8...@digitalmars.com...
> On 03/12/2010 01:40 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>>
>> I never really use IMAP, so I'm not sure if this will apply (though I
>> assume
>> it will), but this works for me:
>>
>> Move message (email-only): Ctrl-Shift-V, th
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 14:40:14 -0500, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Of course, this is all on XP, Outlook Express v6.00.x. For all I know
they
may have changed things for Vista or 7 (although, after having actually
tried both Vista and 7, they'd have to drag XP from my cold dead hands).
OE is gone
On 03/12/2010 01:40 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"Andrei Alexandrescu" wrote in message
news:hne38s$a8...@digitalmars.com...
On 03/12/2010 12:48 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"Andrei Alexandrescu" wrote in message
news:hne1t0$72...@digitalmars.com...
On 03/12/2010 12:27 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote
"Andrei Alexandrescu" wrote in message
news:hne38s$a8...@digitalmars.com...
> On 03/12/2010 12:48 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>> "Andrei Alexandrescu" wrote in message
>> news:hne1t0$72...@digitalmars.com...
>>> On 03/12/2010 12:27 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Wow. You know, a lot of people co
On 03/12/2010 12:48 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"Andrei Alexandrescu" wrote in message
news:hne1t0$72...@digitalmars.com...
On 03/12/2010 12:27 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Wow. You know, a lot of people consider Outlook Express the red-headed
stepchild of email/ng clients (largely because of the
"Nick Sabalausky" wrote in message
news:hne29f$8g...@digitalmars.com...
> "Andrei Alexandrescu" wrote in message
> news:hne1t0$72...@digitalmars.com...
>> On 03/12/2010 12:27 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>>> Wow. You know, a lot of people consider Outlook Express the red-headed
>>> stepchild of e
"Andrei Alexandrescu" wrote in message
news:hne1t0$72...@digitalmars.com...
> On 03/12/2010 12:27 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>> Wow. You know, a lot of people consider Outlook Express the red-headed
>> stepchild of email/ng clients (largely because of the security problems
>> that
>> were fixed
On 03/12/2010 12:27 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Wow. You know, a lot of people consider Outlook Express the red-headed
stepchild of email/ng clients (largely because of the security problems that
were fixed ages ago). But I use it every day and it doesn't have *anything*
like that.
OE (at least
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
That sort of thing is a big pet peeve for me too (Maybe I'm just being
pessemistic, but it seems to be all too common lately). It's definitely a
dominant charactaristic of Mozilla in general though, not just Thunderbird.
Literally at least half the time I use FireFox, the
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
One thing this does point out -- the first experience with software is
the most important. People have no tolerance for bugs in the first usage.
Absolutely right.
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Step 2 is another huge reason of annoyance with both Thunderbird and
Opera. As far as I can tell, if they are downloading headers in the
background, user actions have bottom priority. I want to see a
message, I click, and then I wait and wait and wait. It's like a
wo
"Andrei Alexandrescu" wrote in message
news:op.u9gum0r0c5u...@leptoc...
> On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:39:42 -0600, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>
>> "Andrei Alexandrescu" wrote in message
>> news:hndpev$2om...@digitalmars.com...
>>>
>>> Step 2 is another huge reason of annoyance with both Thunderbird and
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:39:42 -0600, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"Andrei Alexandrescu" wrote in message
news:hndpev$2om...@digitalmars.com...
Step 2 is another huge reason of annoyance with both Thunderbird and
Opera. As far as I can tell, if they are downloading headers in the
background, user ac
"Andrei Alexandrescu" wrote in message
news:hndpev$2om...@digitalmars.com...
>
> Step 2 is another huge reason of annoyance with both Thunderbird and
> Opera. As far as I can tell, if they are downloading headers in the
> background, user actions have bottom priority. I want to see a message,
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 12:08:32 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
NEWSFLASH
I swear that right after I sent the message above, I clicked "OK" to
download "ALL" those 3 messages and the next thing I saw was this (I
wish I was kidding):
http://erdani.com/opera-crash.jpg
It's not impossibl
On 03/12/2010 11:04 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 03/12/2010 10:36 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:17:36 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 03/12/2010 06:55 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 23:13:13 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Thanks,
On 03/12/2010 10:36 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:17:36 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 03/12/2010 06:55 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 23:13:13 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Thanks, Denis. I'm looking at Opera now and will give it a t
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:17:36 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 03/12/2010 06:55 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 23:13:13 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Thanks, Denis. I'm looking at Opera now and will give it a try.
Unfortunately it shares a number of issues with
On 03/12/2010 06:55 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 23:13:13 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Thanks, Denis. I'm looking at Opera now and will give it a try.
Unfortunately it shares a number of issues with Thunderbird, among
which out-of-sync display:
http://erdani.com/op
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 23:13:13 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Thanks, Denis. I'm looking at Opera now and will give it a try.
Unfortunately it shares a number of issues with Thunderbird, among which
out-of-sync display:
http://erdani.com/opera-out-of-sync.jpg
The message displayed in t
Jérôme M. Berger wrote:
Same here, I mean who needs two toolbars when there's enough room
to put everything in one? Plus place them far from one another so
that users never know in which one the button they want to push is
and waste time going back and forth...
HAHAHAHAAA, I should post
On 03/11/2010 05:14 AM, Denis Koroskin wrote:
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 02:53:33 +0300, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
The kick-off meeting for Thunderbird 3:
"Thunderbird 2 is quite sluggish, has poor asynchronous execution of
tasks, poor focus control, and annoying modal dialogs on error. What
do we
grauzone wrote:
> Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> The kick-off meeting for Thunderbird 3:
>>
>> "Thunderbird 2 is quite sluggish, has poor asynchronous execution of
>> tasks, poor focus control, and annoying modal dialogs on error. What
>> do we do for version 3?"
>>
>> ...
>
> The main reason why I
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 02:53:33 +0300, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
The kick-off meeting for Thunderbird 3:
"Thunderbird 2 is quite sluggish, has poor asynchronous execution of
tasks, poor focus control, and annoying modal dialogs on error. What do
we do for version 3?"
"Let's build on all
"Andrei Alexandrescu" wrote in message
news:hn9e8o$4l...@digitalmars.com...
> On 03/10/2010 06:13 PM, grauzone wrote:
>> Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>> The kick-off meeting for Thunderbird 3:
>>>
>>> "Thunderbird 2 is quite sluggish, has poor asynchronous execution of
>>> tasks, poor focus contro
"Nick Sabalausky" wrote in message
news:hna05f$14b...@digitalmars.com...
> "Andrei Alexandrescu" wrote in message
> news:hn9be6$312...@digitalmars.com...
>> The kick-off meeting for Thunderbird 3:
>>
>> "Thunderbird 2 is quite sluggish, has poor asynchronous execution of
>> tasks, poor focus c
"Andrei Alexandrescu" wrote in message
news:hn9be6$312...@digitalmars.com...
> The kick-off meeting for Thunderbird 3:
>
> "Thunderbird 2 is quite sluggish, has poor asynchronous execution of
> tasks, poor focus control, and annoying modal dialogs on error. What do we
> do for version 3?"
>
> "
On 03/10/2010 07:22 PM, MIURA Masahiro wrote:
On 03/11/2010 09:42 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
The main reason why I went back to Thunderbird 2 is that version 3 eats
too much of my precious screen space, displaying useless information
such as the group a post was posted to. I couldn't find ou
On 03/10/2010 08:41 PM, sybrandy wrote:
Wow...you guys must have the worst luck. I use both Thunderbird 3 and
the latest stable Firefox without any of these issues you guys have.
Just out of curiosity, are you using the version that came with your
distro (assuming non windows/mac) or did you get
Wow...you guys must have the worst luck. I use both Thunderbird 3 and
the latest stable Firefox without any of these issues you guys have.
Just out of curiosity, are you using the version that came with your
distro (assuming non windows/mac) or did you get a version from Mozilla?
Casey
On 03/11/2010 09:42 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
The main reason why I went back to Thunderbird 2 is that version 3 eats
too much of my precious screen space, displaying useless information
such as the group a post was posted to. I couldn't find out how to get
the brief subject-poster one line
On 03/10/2010 06:13 PM, grauzone wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
The kick-off meeting for Thunderbird 3:
"Thunderbird 2 is quite sluggish, has poor asynchronous execution of
tasks, poor focus control, and annoying modal dialogs on error. What
do we do for version 3?"
...
The main reason wh
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
The kick-off meeting for Thunderbird 3:
"Thunderbird 2 is quite sluggish, has poor asynchronous execution of
tasks, poor focus control, and annoying modal dialogs on error. What do
we do for version 3?"
...
The main reason why I went back to Thunderbird 2 is that
On 10/03/10 23:53, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
The kick-off meeting for Thunderbird 3:
"Thunderbird 2 is quite sluggish, has poor asynchronous execution of
tasks, poor focus control, and annoying modal dialogs on error. What do
we do for version 3?"
"Let's build on all that! We'll make Thunderbi
The kick-off meeting for Thunderbird 3:
"Thunderbird 2 is quite sluggish, has poor asynchronous execution of
tasks, poor focus control, and annoying modal dialogs on error. What do
we do for version 3?"
"Let's build on all that! We'll make Thunderbird 3 even more sluggish
even on the best of
38 matches
Mail list logo
