Don Clugston:
You mean like the old opStar() (which meant deref), or like
opBinary("+") ?
I meant the even older ones :-)
Bye,
barophile
On 04/06/12 15:38, bearophile wrote:
David Nadlinger:
Actually, I'd say its the other way round – opDollar rather
corresponds to opDoubleEqualSign, as it simply describes the character
used.
I agree. It's the opposite of the semantic names of the original
operator overloading set.
You mean
David Nadlinger:
Actually, I'd say its the other way round – opDollar rather
corresponds to opDoubleEqualSign, as it simply describes the
character used.
I agree. It's the opposite of the semantic names of the original
operator overloading set.
Bye,
bearophile
On Monday, 4 June 2012 at 10:00:20 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
On 04.06.2012 13:57, Don Clugston wrote:
On 03/06/12 19:31, tn wrote:
On Friday, 1 June 2012 at 01:57:36 UTC, kenji hara wrote:
I'd like to propose a new language feature to D community.
...
This patch is an additional enhancement
On Monday, 4 June 2012 at 10:07:38 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
TDPL already lists opDollar, and it's overloading the $
operator, so I would
dispute that a better name _could_ exist. That would be like
saying that
opEquals would be better if it were renamed to
opDoubleEqualSign.
Actually, I'd
On Monday, June 04, 2012 14:00:18 Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
> On 04.06.2012 13:57, Don Clugston wrote:
> > On 03/06/12 19:31, tn wrote:
> >> On Friday, 1 June 2012 at 01:57:36 UTC, kenji hara wrote:
> >>> I'd like to propose a new language feature to D community.
> >>> ...
> >>> This patch is an addi
On 04.06.2012 13:57, Don Clugston wrote:
On 03/06/12 19:31, tn wrote:
On Friday, 1 June 2012 at 01:57:36 UTC, kenji hara wrote:
I'd like to propose a new language feature to D community.
...
This patch is an additional enhancement of opDollar (issue 3474 and
#442).
Sounds awesome. However, t
On 03/06/12 19:31, tn wrote:
On Friday, 1 June 2012 at 01:57:36 UTC, kenji hara wrote:
I'd like to propose a new language feature to D community.
...
This patch is an additional enhancement of opDollar (issue 3474 and
#442).
Sounds awesome. However, the name opDollar should be changed to
some
On Friday, 1 June 2012 at 01:57:36 UTC, kenji hara wrote:
I'd like to propose a new language feature to D community.
...
This patch is an additional enhancement of opDollar (issue 3474
and #442).
Sounds awesome. However, the name opDollar should be changed to
something like opSize, opLength,
On 06/01/12 03:57, kenji hara wrote:
> I'd like to propose a new language feature to D community.
>
> I've opened a enhancement issue half a year ago.
>
> Issue 6798 - Integrate overloadings for multidimentional indexing and
> slicing
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6798
>
>
kenji hara:
I'd like to propose a new language feature to D community.
I think this was discussed and generally appreciated. It seems an
improvement. Thank you Kenji.
Bye,
bearophile
This would be very cool indeed!
+1 from me.
On 01/06/2012 02:57, kenji hara wrote:
I'd like to propose a new language feature to D community.
I've opened a enhancement issue half a year ago.
Issue 6798 - Integrate overloadings for multidimentional indexing and slicing
http://d.puremagic
This is awesome!
I would think, that making ranges like x..y a first-class object would
solve all problems. In that case opSlice would return the slice, rather,
then use it internally.
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 5:57 AM, kenji hara wrote:
> I'd like to propose a new language feature to D community.
I'd like to propose a new language feature to D community.
I've opened a enhancement issue half a year ago.
Issue 6798 - Integrate overloadings for multidimentional indexing and slicing
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6798
And, a pull request for implementing it is now availabl
14 matches
Mail list logo
