On 14/10/10 7:30 PM, bearophile wrote:
Peter Alexander:
That way, you're actually seeing what move semantics will
really bring to the performance of a real program.
There are synthetic benchmarks, and various shades of more realistic
benchmarks. Both kinds have advantages and disadvantages,
Peter Alexander:
> That way, you're actually seeing what move semantics will
> really bring to the performance of a real program.
There are synthetic benchmarks, and various shades of more realistic
benchmarks. Both kinds have advantages and disadvantages, and both have their
place and may be u
== Quote from bearophile (bearophileh...@lycos.com)'s article
> A link found through Reddit, a benchmark about Move Semantics
Benchmark in C++ STL:
> http://cpp-next.com/archive/2010/10/howards-stl-move-semantics-
benchmark/
> Bye,
> bearophile
I don't really like that benchmark. I think it will d
Wow it looks great! Too bad you have to wait so many years to get an
improvement like move.
On Thu, 14 Oct 2010 15:29:52 +0300, bearophile
wrote:
A link found through Reddit, a benchmark about Move Semantics Benchmark
in C++ STL:
http://cpp-next.com/archive/2010/10/howards-stl-move-sema
A link found through Reddit, a benchmark about Move Semantics Benchmark in C++
STL:
http://cpp-next.com/archive/2010/10/howards-stl-move-semantics-benchmark/
Bye,
bearophile
