Hello jcc7,
== Quote from John Reimer (terminal.n...@gmail.com)'s article ...
Our adoption of the original dwt newsgroup and project space was a
move of convenience and simplification... and perhaps may have been
perceived as somewhat opportunistic. That's something I can't
completely deny.
== Quote from John Reimer (terminal.n...@gmail.com)'s article
...
> Our adoption of the original dwt newsgroup and project space was a
> move of convenience and simplification... and perhaps may have been
> perceived as somewhat opportunistic. That's something I can't
> completely deny. I've con
Bill Baxter wrote:
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Don wrote:
John Reimer wrote:
Still it's nice to have a basic cross-platform GUI right there in the
standard distribution of the language.
Does DWT offer that yet? Certainly it didn't at the moment of
'standardisation'.
I don't think so.
Hello Don,
John Reimer wrote:
Hello Bill,
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 6:46 AM, John Reimer
wrote:
Back to the present. Again, it would be easier if we just fix this
situation by changing the "dwt" newsgroup to "GUI" and forget about
the reference to "standard" for now.
Ugh, that would be t
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Don wrote:
> John Reimer wrote:
>>
>>> Still it's nice to have a basic cross-platform GUI right there in the
>>> standard distribution of the language.
>>>
>
> Does DWT offer that yet? Certainly it didn't at the moment of
> 'standardisation'.
I don't think so. It
John Reimer wrote:
Hello Bill,
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 6:46 AM, John Reimer
wrote:
Back to the present. Again, it would be easier if we just fix this
situation by changing the "dwt" newsgroup to "GUI" and forget about
the reference to "standard" for now.
Ugh, that would be terrible. I re
Hello Bill,
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 6:46 AM, John Reimer
wrote:
Back to the present. Again, it would be easier if we just fix this
situation by changing the "dwt" newsgroup to "GUI" and forget about
the reference to "standard" for now.
Ugh, that would be terrible. I really don't care what
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 6:46 AM, John Reimer wrote:
> Back to the present. Again, it would be easier if we just fix this
> situation by changing the "dwt" newsgroup to "GUI" and forget about the
> reference to "standard" for now.
Ugh, that would be terrible. I really don't care what troubles a
Hello Don,
Stewart Gordon wrote:
John Reimer wrote:
2) You don't have enough information to go on to make that change,
unless you have dicussed this with Walter. Maybe he doesn't want to
recognize the old DWT as "standard" anymore, if it isn't actively
developed. Maybe neither library is
Stewart Gordon wrote:
John Reimer wrote:
2) You don't have enough information to go on to make that change,
unless you have dicussed this with Walter. Maybe he doesn't want to
recognize the old DWT as "standard" anymore, if it isn't actively
developed. Maybe neither library is "standard".
Hello Alexander,
Stewart Gordon wrote:
John Reimer wrote:
2) You don't have enough information to go on to make that change,
unless you have dicussed this with Walter. Maybe he doesn't want to
recognize the old DWT as "standard" anymore, if it isn't actively
developed. Maybe neither libra
Stewart Gordon wrote:
John Reimer wrote:
2) You don't have enough information to go on to make that change,
unless you have dicussed this with Walter. Maybe he doesn't want to
recognize the old DWT as "standard" anymore, if it isn't actively
developed. Maybe neither library is "standard".
John Reimer wrote:
2) You don't have enough information to go on to make that change,
unless you have dicussed this with Walter. Maybe he doesn't want to
recognize the old DWT as "standard" anymore, if it isn't actively
developed. Maybe neither library is "standard".
Maybe you're right.
Hello Bill,
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 2:53 PM, John Reimer
wrote:
Hello Stewart,
John Reimer wrote:
Good question. I think the new dwt release just inherited (or
hijacked) the title based on the release made by Shawn a couple of
years ago which was Phobos compatible.
So effectively, the
Hello jcc7,
Other issues (such as whether DWT should be the standard, whether it
should be noted so prominently on the wiki page, and whether there's
any brainwashing occurring) are still up for debate.
Our adoption of the original dwt newsgroup and project space was a move of
convenience
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 2:53 PM, John Reimer wrote:
> Hello Stewart,
>
>> John Reimer wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Good question. I think the new dwt release just inherited (or
>>> hijacked) the title based on the release made by Shawn a couple of
>>> years ago which was Phobos compatible.
>>>
>> So effect
Hello Stewart,
Alexander Pánek wrote:
Stewart Gordon wrote:
Really, while Tango DWT may have superseded Phobos DWT as being the
DWT that's still actively maintained, Phobos DWT remains the SDGL.
That’s a tremendously awesome idea. It’s at least as awesome as to
keep the car with two blown
Hello Stewart,
John Reimer wrote:
Good question. I think the new dwt release just inherited (or
hijacked) the title based on the release made by Shawn a couple of
years ago which was Phobos compatible.
So effectively, the Phobos-based DWT is what was passed off as the
"standard D GUI librar
Alexander Pánek wrote:
Stewart Gordon wrote:
Really, while Tango DWT may have superseded Phobos DWT as being the
DWT that's still actively maintained, Phobos DWT remains the SDGL.
That’s a tremendously awesome idea. It’s at least as awesome as to keep
the car with two blown tyres and no engin
Stewart Gordon wrote:
Really,
while Tango DWT may have superseded Phobos DWT as being the DWT that's
still actively maintained, Phobos DWT remains the SDGL.
That’s a tremendously awesome idea. It’s at least as awesome as to keep
the car with two blown tyres and no engine because it’s been dec
John Reimer wrote:
Good question. I think the new dwt release just inherited (or hijacked)
the title based on the release made by Shawn a couple of years ago which
was Phobos compatible.
So effectively, the Phobos-based DWT is what was passed off as the
"standard D GUI library", and when th
Piotrek wrote:
Tim M wrote:
It's brainwashing people into think that dwt is the best thing around.
IMHO, It's better then anything around. It works on Linux/Windows and is
easy to use. There's only one competitor named gtkD, but... the button
usage example from the project site with such a n
Hello tim,
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 04:08:28 +1300, John Reimer
wrote:
...
Personally, I think we're at a point in D's life where we don't need
to
call it standard. Maybe it would be better to have a newsgroup
called
"GUI" instead. I'm not sure.
-JJR
That sounds more fair. Incase
Tim M wrote:
It's brainwashing people into think that dwt is the best thing around.
IMHO, It's better then anything around. It works on Linux/Windows and is
easy to use. There's only one competitor named gtkD, but... the button
usage example from the project site with such a nice line of code
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 04:08:28 +1300, John Reimer
wrote:
...
Personally, I think we're at a point in D's life where we don't need to
call it standard. Maybe it would be better to have a newsgroup called
"GUI" instead. I'm not sure.
-JJR
That sounds more fair. Incase you
Hello tim,
On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 13:25:39 +1300, Stewart Gordon
wrote:
http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?GuiLibraries
This page gives the standard D GUI library as being DWT, which is now
a "Tango based port of SWT v3.4 GUI Library + JFace and more".
Note "Tango based". How can it be
== Quote from Tim M (a...@b.com)'s article
...
> Now that you brought the subject up I would just like to add my
> opinion on something which I've been meaning to say for a long time.
> I really disagree with the way that page describes the various
> options. It says standard d gui library and othe
On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 13:25:39 +1300, Stewart Gordon
wrote:
http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?GuiLibraries
This page gives the standard D GUI library as being DWT, which is now a
"Tango based port of SWT v3.4 GUI Library + JFace and more".
Note "Tango based". How can it be the stand
Hello Stewart,
http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?GuiLibraries
This page gives the standard D GUI library as being DWT, which is now
a "Tango based port of SWT v3.4 GUI Library + JFace and more".
Note "Tango based". How can it be the standard D GUI library when it
isn't compatible with s
http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?GuiLibraries
This page gives the standard D GUI library as being DWT, which is now a
"Tango based port of SWT v3.4 GUI Library + JFace and more".
Note "Tango based". How can it be the standard D GUI library when it
isn't compatible with standard D, i.e
30 matches
Mail list logo
