A potential "mod_d" Apache module would go a long way to promote D language to
the web application world.
But it seems that implementing a "mod_d" Apache module may require that C
instantiates a D language interpreter (similar to Py_NewInterpreter() for
Python), or do the functionality of RDMD wit
JFD schrieb:
A potential "mod_d" Apache module would go a long way to promote D language to
the web application world.
But it seems that implementing a "mod_d" Apache module may require that C
instantiates a D language interpreter (similar to Py_NewInterpreter() for
Python), or do the functional
Yes, you're right. One should implement Apache module in D.
One thing is that Apache module entry point expects a "C" function. I've figure
that that one could just add extern(C) in front of D function to be callable
from
C, so that was easy. Also, Apache expects .so shared library, and one co
On 11/8/10 4:37 PM, JFD wrote:
Yes, you're right. One should implement Apache module in D.
One thing is that Apache module entry point expects a "C" function. I've figure
that that one could just add extern(C) in front of D function to be callable
from
C, so that was easy. Also, Apache expec
2010/11/9 Andrei Alexandrescu :
> People at Facebook told me that the adoption of D inside the company might
> be helped if they could simply write to insert D code into a
> page. I'm not sure how difficult such a plugin would be to implement. Also,
> D code should be able to call PHP code (which
"Andrei Alexandrescu" wrote in message
news:ibaepi$vf...@digitalmars.com...
>
> People at Facebook told me that the adoption of D inside the company might
> be helped if they could simply write to insert D code into a
> page. I'm not sure how difficult such a plugin would be to implement.
I'm
On 11/8/10 9:17 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"Andrei Alexandrescu" wrote in message
news:ibaepi$vf...@digitalmars.com...
People at Facebook told me that the adoption of D inside the company might
be helped if they could simply write to insert D code into a
page. I'm not sure how difficult such
"Andrei Alexandrescu" wrote in message
news:ibam3u$1b5...@digitalmars.com...
> On 11/8/10 9:17 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>> "Andrei Alexandrescu" wrote in message
>> news:ibaepi$vf...@digitalmars.com...
>>>
>>> People at Facebook told me that the adoption of D inside the company
>>> might
>>>
On Tue, 9 Nov 2010 00:17:48 -0500
"Nick Sabalausky" wrote:
> > People at Facebook told me that the adoption of D inside the company might
> > be helped if they could simply write to insert D code into a
> > page. I'm not sure how difficult such a plugin would be to implement.
>
> I'm very s
"spir" wrote in message
news:mailman.201.1289284596.21107.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
> On Tue, 9 Nov 2010 00:17:48 -0500
> "Nick Sabalausky" wrote:
>
> > > People at Facebook told me that the adoption of D inside the company
> > > might
> > > be helped if they could simply write to insert
On 11/8/10 10:36 PM, spir wrote:
On Tue, 9 Nov 2010 00:17:48 -0500
"Nick Sabalausky" wrote:
People at Facebook told me that the adoption of D inside the company might
be helped if they could simply write to insert D code into a
page. I'm not sure how difficult such a plugin would be to implem
"Andrei Alexandrescu" wrote in message
news:ibark6$1k3...@digitalmars.com...
> On 11/8/10 10:36 PM, spir wrote:
>> On Tue, 9 Nov 2010 00:17:48 -0500
>> "Nick Sabalausky" wrote:
>>
People at Facebook told me that the adoption of D inside the company
might
be helped if they could s
JFD wrote:
Yes, you're right. One should implement Apache module in D.
One thing is that Apache module entry point expects a "C" function. I've figure
that that one could just add extern(C) in front of D function to be callable
from
C, so that was easy. Also, Apache expects .so shared librar
On 2010-11-09 01:37, JFD wrote:
Yes, you're right. One should implement Apache module in D.
One thing is that Apache module entry point expects a "C" function. I've figure
that that one could just add extern(C) in front of D function to be callable
from
C, so that was easy. Also, Apache expe
On 2010-11-09 06:17, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"Andrei Alexandrescu" wrote in message
news:ibaepi$vf...@digitalmars.com...
People at Facebook told me that the adoption of D inside the company might
be helped if they could simply write to insert D code into a
page. I'm not sure how difficult such
Ahh, I see that's written by the ANTLR/StringTemplate guy. I never read that
paper, but the docs for his StringTemplate were a big part of what convinced
me that template engines shouldn't try to be full-fledged imperative
programming languages.
I've done web development for a chunk of my care
On 2010-11-09 04:21, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 11/8/10 4:37 PM, JFD wrote:
Yes, you're right. One should implement Apache module in D.
One thing is that Apache module entry point expects a "C" function.
I've figure
that that one could just add extern(C) in front of D function to be
callable
"Jacob Carlborg" wrote in message
news:ibbjmv$e8...@digitalmars.com...
> On 2010-11-09 04:21, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> On 11/8/10 4:37 PM, JFD wrote:
>>> Yes, you're right. One should implement Apache module in D.
>>>
>>> One thing is that Apache module entry point expects a "C" function.
>>
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
I seem to remember hearing that was being depricated. And it was never
anything like what Andrei's describing. IIRC, all it did was completely
ignore all the HTML stuff (ie, treat it like comments). It didn't send it to
Stdout or anything.
Right. It was not a good idea
On 11/9/2010 12:17 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"Andrei Alexandrescu" wrote in message
news:ibaepi$vf...@digitalmars.com...
People at Facebook told me that the adoption of D inside the company might
be helped if they could simply write to insert D code into a
page. I'm not sure how difficult su
"Eric Poggel" wrote in message
news:ibcn72$2u3...@digitalmars.com...
> On 11/9/2010 12:17 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>> "Andrei Alexandrescu" wrote in message
>> news:ibaepi$vf...@digitalmars.com...
>>>
>>> People at Facebook told me that the adoption of D inside the company
>>> might
>>> be he
On 11/9/2010 12:17 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> "Andrei Alexandrescu" wrote in message
> news:ibaepi$vf...@digitalmars.com...
>>
>> People at Facebook told me that the adoption of D inside the company might
>> be helped if they could simply write to insert D code into a
>> page. I'm not sure h
On 11/9/2010 7:25 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
I could probably live with that as long as the "PHP template" stayed
view-only and didn't grow too much logic.
Are there any web-friendly languages that are mature, offer the sanity
and static typing of C#, and the "immediate mode" of php?
"Eric Poggel" wrote in message
news:ibd00s$dl...@digitalmars.com...
> On 11/9/2010 7:25 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>> I could probably live with that as long as the "PHP template" stayed
>> view-only and didn't grow too much logic.
>
> Are there any web-friendly languages that are mature, offer t
On 2010-11-10 01:25, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"Eric Poggel" wrote in message
news:ibcn72$2u3...@digitalmars.com...
On 11/9/2010 12:17 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"Andrei Alexandrescu" wrote in message
news:ibaepi$vf...@digitalmars.com...
People at Facebook told me that the adoption of D insid
On 2010-11-10 03:28, Eric Poggel wrote:
On 11/9/2010 7:25 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
I could probably live with that as long as the "PHP template" stayed
view-only and didn't grow too much logic.
Are there any web-friendly languages that are mature, offer the sanity
and static typing of C#, an
On 2010-11-10 00:57, Eric Poggel wrote:
On 11/9/2010 12:17 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"Andrei Alexandrescu" wrote in message
news:ibaepi$vf...@digitalmars.com...
People at Facebook told me that the adoption of D inside the company
might
be helped if they could simply write to insert D code int
On 11/09/2010 06:57 PM, Eric Poggel wrote:
I've always felt the opposite way. It's been a while since I've worked
with Asp.net controls, but I remember something like this:
.
// Later, in C#
for (int i=0; i<10; i++)
List.innerHtml += "" + sanitize(someArray[i]) + ""
While php would do some
== Quote from Nick Sabalausky (a...@a.a)'s article
> "Eric Poggel" wrote in message
> news:ibd00s$dl...@digitalmars.com...
> > On 11/9/2010 7:25 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> >> I could probably live with that as long as the "PHP template" stayed
> >> view-only and didn't grow too much logic.
> >
>
Eric Poggel wrote:
> Are there any web-friendly languages that are mature, offer the sanity and
> static typing of C#, and the "immediate mode" of php?
We could do it in D, somewhat easily. Here's an implementation with only mild
bugginess:
===
import std.file;
import std.string;
import std.std
On 11/8/2010 11:45 PM, JFD wrote:
A potential "mod_d" Apache module would go a long way to promote D language to
the web application world.
But it seems that implementing a "mod_d" Apache module may require that C
instantiates a D language interpreter (similar to Py_NewInterpreter() for
Python),
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> (but I've done worse - I once tried to build HTML
> buy manually adding nodes to an XML DOM...it seemed like a good idea
> until I actually started doing it).
This is actually one of the methods I've been using in my D web apps throughout
the year. It's not that bad if you
"Radu" wrote in message news:ibe95h$gl...@digitalmars.com...
> On 11/8/2010 11:45 PM, JFD wrote:
>> A potential "mod_d" Apache module would go a long way to promote D
>> language to
>> the web application world.
>>
>> But it seems that implementing a "mod_d" Apache module may require that C
>> in
"Nick Sabalausky" wrote in message
news:ibev09$1vf...@digitalmars.com...
> "Radu" wrote in message news:ibe95h$gl...@digitalmars.com...
>> On 11/8/2010 11:45 PM, JFD wrote:
>>> A potential "mod_d" Apache module would go a long way to promote D
>>> language to
>>> the web application world.
>>>
On 11/10/2010 10:47 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"Nick Sabalausky" wrote in message
news:ibev09$1vf...@digitalmars.com...
"Radu" wrote in message news:ibe95h$gl...@digitalmars.com...
On 11/8/2010 11:45 PM, JFD wrote:
A potential "mod_d" Apache module would go a long way to promote D
language t
"sybrandy" wrote in message
news:ibbkh3$fv...@digitalmars.com...
>> Ahh, I see that's written by the ANTLR/StringTemplate guy. I never read
>> that
>> paper, but the docs for his StringTemplate were a big part of what
>> convinced
>> me that template engines shouldn't try to be full-fledged imp
== Quote from Jacob Carlborg (d...@me.com)'s article
> On 2010-11-09 01:37, JFD wrote:
> > Yes, you're right. One should implement Apache module in D.
> >
> > One thing is that Apache module entry point expects a "C" function. I've
> > figure
> > that that one could just add extern(C) in front o
On 11/9/2010 1:36 AM, spir wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Nov 2010 00:17:48 -0500
> "Nick Sabalausky" wrote:
>
>>> People at Facebook told me that the adoption of D inside the company might
>>> be helped if they could simply write to insert D code into a
>>> page. I'm not sure how difficult such a plugin
> Can't DMD already compile D code embedded in HTML:
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/html.html ?
I tried the sample at the link, but got error. I also tried it without the HTML
code inside. Am I missing something?
$ dmd hello.html
Error: module hello html source files is deprecated hello.htm
On 09/11/10 14:24, JFD wrote:
Can't DMD already compile D code embedded in HTML:
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/html.html ?
I tried the sample at the link, but got error. I also tried it without the HTML
code inside. Am I missing something?
$ dmd hello.html
Error: module hello html source
40 matches
Mail list logo
