This has come up as one issue for adoption to D. D2.x is on its way, unstable,
and D1.x is getting the ax. While Walter has said that the compiler will
continue to get support, no one in the community knows what the library support
will be like. I came across an article where even Python wasn't
Jesse Phillips wrote:
This has come up as one issue for adoption to D. D2.x is on its way,
unstable, and D1.x is getting the ax. While Walter has said that the
compiler will continue to get support, no one in the community knows
what the library support will be like. I came across an article wher
Walter Bright wrote:
> One of the comments in there:
>
> "One of the greatest problems I found when trying Common Lisp was the
> large number of implementations and the disorganization of the library
> space. It is hard for a newcomer to decide which libraries are
> available, which are maintai
On 03.12.2009 1:13, Jesse Phillips wrote:
This has come up as one issue for adoption to D. D2.x is on its way, unstable,
and D1.x is getting the ax. While Walter has said that the compiler will
continue to get support, no one in the community knows what the library support
will be like. I came
Jesse Phillips wrote:
Well, part of the problem is that you can use all of those arguments
against D (That includes the complaint about Lisp). Maybe not if you
just look at D1 or just D2, and many times the complaints aren't as
big an issue as they are made out to be once you start using the
lang
torhu wrote:
On 03.12.2009 1:13, Jesse Phillips wrote:
This has come up as one issue for adoption to D. D2.x is on its way,
unstable, and D1.x is getting the ax. While Walter has said that the
compiler will continue to get support, no one in the community knows
what the library support will be
Jesse Phillips schrieb:
I'm not claiming D is in the wrong in its chosen path. This shows that other
languages deal with similar issues, but is one thing for someone familiar with
a language to not choose it for a project than it is to get someone to look
into a new language.
From time to ti
Walter Bright Wrote:
> Jesse Phillips wrote:
> > Well, part of the problem is that you can use all of those arguments
> > against D (That includes the complaint about Lisp). Maybe not if you
> > just look at D1 or just D2, and many times the complaints aren't as
> > big an issue as they are made o
On 2009-12-03 01:13:13 +0100, Jesse Phillips said:
This has come up as one issue for adoption to D. D2.x is on its way,
unstable, and D1.x is getting the ax. While Walter has said that the
compiler will continue to get support, no one in the community knows
what the library support will be lik
Daniel de Kok, el 4 de diciembre a las 09:38 me escribiste:
> On 2009-12-03 01:13:13 +0100, Jesse Phillips
> said:
> >This has come up as one issue for adoption to D. D2.x is on its
> >way, unstable, and D1.x is getting the ax. While Walter has said
> >that the compiler will continue to get supp
"Leandro Lucarella" wrote in message
news:20091204133103.gb27...@llucax.com.ar...
> Daniel de Kok, el 4 de diciembre a las 09:38 me escribiste:
>> On 2009-12-03 01:13:13 +0100, Jesse Phillips
>> said:
>> >This has come up as one issue for adoption to D. D2.x is on its
>> >way, unstable, and D1
Nick Sabalausky, el 4 de diciembre a las 10:03 me escribiste:
> > The second release with the change has the new/removed feature. That gives
> > people time to fix their programs and try the new feature without breaking
> > anything for several months (a minor Python version is released each ~9
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
