justme wrote:
grauzone Wrote:
bearophile wrote:
BCS:
A though on the comma operator: if the comma operator were
defined to give a tuple type and be implicitly castable to any
suffix of it's self, then you could get both the comma
expression usage that Walter wants as well as all the fun
thing
I believe he could replace comma operator with AOC (Any Other
Character) operator: just replace comma with "something" which is not
yet used. Choose some fancy-looking Unicode character that no one
will really use but the compiler itself to generate intermediate
code.
If you don't expect it
Don:
> I'd recommend at least two years of bug-fixes and library
> development (and toolchain issues), before we even think about more
> features.
There are two other important thing that can be done in that stabilizing period:
1) find where are the D2 design mistakes and invent better ways to d
Denis Koroskin wrote:
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 15:41:58 +0300, justme wrote:
grauzone Wrote:
bearophile wrote:
> BCS:
>> A though on the comma operator: if the comma operator were defined
to give
>> a tuple type and be implicitly castable to any suffix of it's
self, then
>> you could get both t
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 15:41:58 +0300, justme wrote:
grauzone Wrote:
bearophile wrote:
> BCS:
>> A though on the comma operator: if the comma operator were defined
to give
>> a tuple type and be implicitly castable to any suffix of it's self,
then
>> you could get both the comma expression u
BCS wrote:
> Hello justme,
>
>> bearophile Wrote:
>>
>>> C# will probably not follow the route of stagnation of Java for some
>>> more time, thanks to Mono too. I don't like that string interpolation
>>> syntax because it looks unsafe, and that design of tuples can be
>>> improved, but they are
grauzone Wrote:
> bearophile wrote:
> > BCS:
> >> A though on the comma operator: if the comma operator were defined to give
> >> a tuple type and be implicitly castable to any suffix of it's self, then
> >> you could get both the comma expression usage that Walter wants as well as
> >> all the
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 09:29:22 +0300, Don wrote:
justme wrote:
grauzone Wrote:
BCS wrote:
Hello justme,
bearophile Wrote:
C# will probably not follow the route of stagnation of Java for some
more time, thanks to Mono too. I don't like that string
interpolation
syntax because it looks u
bearophile wrote:
BCS:
A though on the comma operator: if the comma operator were defined to give
a tuple type and be implicitly castable to any suffix of it's self, then
you could get both the comma expression usage that Walter wants as well as
all the fun things that tuple expressions give.
BCS:
> A though on the comma operator: if the comma operator were defined to give
> a tuple type and be implicitly castable to any suffix of it's self, then
> you could get both the comma expression usage that Walter wants as well as
> all the fun things that tuple expressions give.
D2 has enou
justme wrote:
grauzone Wrote:
BCS wrote:
Hello justme,
bearophile Wrote:
C# will probably not follow the route of stagnation of Java for some
more time, thanks to Mono too. I don't like that string interpolation
syntax because it looks unsafe, and that design of tuples can be
improved, but
grauzone Wrote:
> BCS wrote:
> > Hello justme,
> >
> >> bearophile Wrote:
> >>
> >>> C# will probably not follow the route of stagnation of Java for some
> >>> more time, thanks to Mono too. I don't like that string interpolation
> >>> syntax because it looks unsafe, and that design of tuples can
BCS wrote:
Hello justme,
bearophile Wrote:
C# will probably not follow the route of stagnation of Java for some
more time, thanks to Mono too. I don't like that string interpolation
syntax because it looks unsafe, and that design of tuples can be
improved, but they are listening to programmes
Hello justme,
bearophile Wrote:
C# will probably not follow the route of stagnation of Java for some
more time, thanks to Mono too. I don't like that string interpolation
syntax because it looks unsafe, and that design of tuples can be
improved, but they are listening to programmes (even if th
14 matches
Mail list logo