On 2011-05-27 12:27, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> On 2011-05-27 16:38, Matthew Ong wrote:
> > On 5/27/2011 9:37 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> >> When coding my own projects (projects I've written from scratch and not
> >> ported from other languages) it's a feature I rarely use, don't know if
> >> I ever
On 2011-05-27 16:38, Matthew Ong wrote:
On 5/27/2011 9:37 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-05-27 13:42, Matthew Ong wrote:
On 5/27/2011 7:08 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Maybe you are not doing something correctly, you shouldn't need this
feature all the time.
Not me, others that has code
On 2011-05-27 16:09, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Fri, 27 May 2011 09:43:39 -0400, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-05-27 14:08, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I may see why you see so many cases -- dwt was likely ran through a java
to d converter, and such converters often add unnecessary line
On Fri, 27 May 2011 13:25:51 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 5/27/11 1:06 PM, Dejan Lekic wrote:
A couple of years ago, Walter gave a talk on hijacking to NWCPP. It all
went well until HiddenFunc, at which point Walter's assertion that the
way out was by throwing an exception was hotly
On 5/27/11 1:06 PM, Dejan Lekic wrote:
A couple of years ago, Walter gave a talk on hijacking to NWCPP. It all
went well until HiddenFunc, at which point Walter's assertion that the
way out was by throwing an exception was hotly debated. Several people
suggested alternative, of whom one proposed
On 5/27/2011 10:10 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 5/27/11 1:34 AM, Matthew Ong wrote:
Hi All,
At least not using foo and bar, I am able to understand some of that is
being discussed here. Thank you all.
>2 is just annoying.
For the sake of backward compatibility, keep that machination.
Ho
A couple of years ago, Walter gave a talk on hijacking to NWCPP. It all
went well until HiddenFunc, at which point Walter's assertion that the
way out was by throwing an exception was hotly debated. Several people
suggested alternative, of whom one proposed (4) above. Everybody agreed
it's a good
On 5/27/11 10:04 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Fri, 27 May 2011 10:54:14 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
It is completely against the spirit of the language to decide that a
call is resolved to an invalid method during runtime. There is no
other feature remotely related to hiddenfunc.
On Fri, 27 May 2011 10:54:14 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
It is completely against the spirit of the language to decide that a
call is resolved to an invalid method during runtime. There is no other
feature remotely related to hiddenfunc.
A couple of years ago, Walter gave a talk on
On 5/27/11 9:26 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Fri, 27 May 2011 10:10:25 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 5/27/11 1:34 AM, Matthew Ong wrote:
Hi All,
Currently within D, to make use of a parent class method you have to do:
class Parent{
void methodA(int x){...}
}
class Child : Paren
On 5/27/2011 9:37 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-05-27 13:42, Matthew Ong wrote:
On 5/27/2011 7:08 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Maybe you are not doing something correctly, you shouldn't need this
feature all the time.
Not me, others that has coded the dwt and I suspect other code in
dso
On Fri, 27 May 2011 10:10:25 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 5/27/11 1:34 AM, Matthew Ong wrote:
Hi All,
Currently within D, to make use of a parent class method you have to do:
class Parent{
void methodA(int x){...}
}
class Child : Parent{
// I understand that it has to do with preve
On 5/27/11 1:34 AM, Matthew Ong wrote:
Hi All,
Currently within D, to make use of a parent class method you have to do:
class Parent{
void methodA(int x){...}
}
class Child : Parent{
// I understand that it has to do with preventing accidental hijacking
alias Parent.methodA methodA;
void method
On Fri, 27 May 2011 09:43:39 -0400, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-05-27 14:08, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I may see why you see so many cases -- dwt was likely ran through a java
to d converter, and such converters often add unnecessary lines, because
it is easier to do that than to examine
On 2011-05-27 14:08, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Fri, 27 May 2011 07:42:17 -0400, Matthew Ong wrote:
On 5/27/2011 7:08 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I don't think it will work that well. Consider how function hijacking
happens. For instance, the parent class author may not even know his
On 2011-05-27 13:42, Matthew Ong wrote:
On 5/27/2011 7:08 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Do you have cases where you have to "alias all over the place"?
news://news.digitalmars.com:119/iri4am$2dl3$1...@digitalmars.com
http://hg.dsource.org/projects/dwt2/file/d00e8db0a568/base/src/java/io/ByteA
On Fri, 27 May 2011 08:36:08 -0400, Matthew Ong wrote:
On 5/27/2011 8:08 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Sorry, I used the wrong term, I meant derived or extended.
Explain please. You lost me. If I am not wrong, final is used to prevent
overriding. Is that what you are talking about?
No, I
On 5/27/2011 8:08 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Sorry, I used the wrong term, I meant derived or extended.
Explain please. You lost me. If I am not wrong, final is used to prevent
overriding. Is that what you are talking about?
Yes, but you marked the child as inheritall, doesn't this impli
On Fri, 27 May 2011 07:42:17 -0400, Matthew Ong wrote:
On 5/27/2011 7:08 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I don't think it will work that well. Consider how function hijacking
happens. For instance, the parent class author may not even know his
code is being overridden, and he may simply not m
On 5/27/2011 7:08 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Fri, 27 May 2011 02:34:34 -0400, Matthew Ong wrote:
Hi All,
Currently within D, to make use of a parent class method you have to do:
class Parent{
void methodA(int x){...}
}
class Child : Parent{
// I understand that it has to do with prev
On Fri, 27 May 2011 02:34:34 -0400, Matthew Ong wrote:
Hi All,
Currently within D, to make use of a parent class method you have to do:
class Parent{
void methodA(int x){...}
}
class Child : Parent{
// I understand that it has to do with preventing accidental
hijacking
alias
On 5/27/2011 2:54 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
Hi Jacob,
See some of the source code shown here. I did not code them, but can
sense the pattern is not too productive brain cycle invested.
Cycle= trying to locate up the tree of inherited object.
BTW, default D documentation is Not too friendly for
On 2011-05-27 08:34, Matthew Ong wrote:
Hi All,
Currently within D, to make use of a parent class method you have to do:
class Parent{
void methodA(int x){...}
}
class Child : Parent{
// I understand that it has to do with preventing accidental hijacking
alias Parent.methodA methodA;
void metho
Hi All,
Currently within D, to make use of a parent class method you have to do:
class Parent{
void methodA(int x){...}
}
class Child : Parent{
// I understand that it has to do with preventing accidental hijacking
alias Parent.methodA methodA;
void methodA(long x){...}
}
void ma
24 matches
Mail list logo
