Re: D, Dub, Debian, Fedora

2015-01-19 Thread Bioinfornatics via Digitalmars-d
Hi, I am a fedora packager. I packaged libraries for fedora using a makefile, cmake and other but not dub. I will not use dub until they support makefile. I have no time to add this feature and it seem we have all same problem :-). Using scons is fine to me, I could package it. If you want to

Re: D, Dub, Debian, Fedora

2015-01-19 Thread ponce via Digitalmars-d
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 14:48:32 UTC, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d wrote: Has anyone been in contact with Debian and Fedora packagers to see if using Dub as a build system is acceptable to them for packaging? I know Debian folk still prefer Autotools, but accept Make or SCons (but

D, Dub, Debian, Fedora

2015-01-19 Thread Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d
Has anyone been in contact with Debian and Fedora packagers to see if using Dub as a build system is acceptable to them for packaging? I know Debian folk still prefer Autotools, but accept Make or SCons (but definitely not Waf). My suspicion is that Debian will deem it not acceptable, but this is

Re: D, Dub, Debian, Fedora

2015-01-19 Thread weaselcat via Digitalmars-d
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 14:48:32 UTC, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d wrote: Has anyone been in contact with Debian and Fedora packagers to see if using Dub as a build system is acceptable to them for packaging? I know Debian folk still prefer Autotools, but accept Make or SCons (but

Re: D, Dub, Debian, Fedora

2015-01-19 Thread Paul O'Neil via Digitalmars-d
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 14:48:32 UTC, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d wrote: Has anyone been in contact with Debian and Fedora packagers to see if using Dub as a build system is acceptable to them for packaging? I know Debian folk still prefer Autotools, but accept Make or SCons (but