D 2.00 official spec

2009-09-06 Thread Justin Johansson
Having trolled all over DM site in search for an official D 2.0 spec similar to that as exists for D 1.0 (spec_DMD_1.00.pdf), I seem to be out of luck. Does such a document exist and would someone please point me to it? Thanks for all help.

Re: D 2.00 official spec

2009-09-06 Thread Jeremie Pelletier
Justin Johansson Wrote: > Having trolled all over DM site in search for an official D 2.0 spec similar > to that as exists for D 1.0 (spec_DMD_1.00.pdf), I seem to be out of luck. > > Does such a document exist and would someone please point me to it? > > Thanks for all help. > D2 is still in

Re: D 2.00 official spec

2009-09-07 Thread Justin Johansson
> D2 is still in development, therefore there is no spec yet. Thanks for answer Jeremie. Understood .. admittedly the D2 compiler download does say alpha. Is there any hint of a draft though or is it a fast moving target? Either way what's the best way to track where it's at?

Re: D 2.00 official spec

2009-09-07 Thread Robin KAY
Justin Johansson wrote: D2 is still in development, therefore there is no spec yet. Thanks for answer Jeremie. Understood .. admittedly the D2 compiler download does say alpha. Is there any hint of a draft though or is it a fast moving target? Either way what's the best way to track where

Re: D 2.00 official spec

2009-09-07 Thread Justin Johansson
Robin KAY Wrote: > The current specifications for D1 and D2 are on the Digital Mars > web-site. Use the side-bar to view the different sections. > > http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/lex.html > > http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/lex.html > > The D1 specification is also subject to change as (slo

Re: D 2.00 official spec

2009-09-07 Thread Jarrett Billingsley
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 8:12 AM, Justin Johansson wrote: > Now is this blurry vision to blame or a typo at line 23 into the first > example this page? > > http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/index.html > >        // Improved typesafe printf >        writeln(cl.argnum, cl.suffix, " arg: ", cl.argv); >

Re: D 2.00 official spec

2009-09-07 Thread Nick B
Justin Johansson wrote: D2 is still in development, therefore there is no spec yet. Thanks for answer Jeremie. Understood .. admittedly the D2 compiler download does say alpha. Is there any hint of a draft though or is it a fast moving target? Either way what's the best way to track where

Re: D 2.00 official spec

2009-09-07 Thread Jesse Phillips
On Sun, 06 Sep 2009 23:36:13 -0400, Justin Johansson wrote: > Having trolled all over DM site in search for an official D 2.0 spec > similar to that as exists for D 1.0 (spec_DMD_1.00.pdf), I seem to be > out of luck. > > Does such a document exist and would someone please point me to it? > > Th