On 06/06/2014 23:40, Brian Schott wrote:
On Friday, 6 June 2014 at 22:25:16 UTC, Tom Browder via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
Now I'm confused--the three files I've found have differences in
production rules--it looks like I'll have to look at what the
compiler is actually doing--I'm putting that off f
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 3:58 AM, Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
...
> You can start by filing an issue, including the input source used. If you
> then manage to reduce the test case that's even better. I just don't want
> the issue to get lost.
Issue just filed as #26. I got the test cas
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 4:11 AM, Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On 2014-06-08 10:33, Dicebot wrote:
>
>> AFAIR `gcc- E` output is not a valid C on its own, no wonder libclang
>> chokes on it. Using llvm/clang toolchain with dstep results in much more
>> pleasant experience (not surprisin
On 2014-06-08 10:33, Dicebot wrote:
AFAIR `gcc- E` output is not a valid C on its own, no wonder libclang
chokes on it. Using llvm/clang toolchain with dstep results in much more
pleasant experience (not surprisingly as dstep is implemented on top of it)
Hmm, it adds a bunch of lines looking l
On 2014-06-07 23:15, Tom Browder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Ditto.
It might be a while, though.
You can start by filing an issue, including the input source used. If
you then manage to reduce the test case that's even better. I just don't
want the issue to get lost.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 2014-06-07 23:16, Tom Browder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
That's another itch!
That's what the dtoh tool is for. It might create bindings for C++, I'm
not sure.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On Saturday, 7 June 2014 at 17:46:06 UTC, Tom Browder via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Tom Browder
wrote:
On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Jacob Carlborg via
Digitalmars-d
wrote:
...
There's already a tool for that [1]. It uses the JSON output
from the
compiler.
[
On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
...
> I just though you want to create C bindings for a D library, since you asked
> about the D grammar.
That's another itch!
Best,
-Tom
On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On 2014-06-07 19:45, Tom Browder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
>
>> And Jacob, when I try your dstep on a header preprocessed with gcc -E
>> I don't get very far:
>
>
> Could you try without preprocessing the file first? It shoul
On 2014-06-07 19:45, Tom Browder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
And Jacob, when I try your dstep on a header preprocessed with gcc -E
I don't get very far:
Could you try without preprocessing the file first? It shouldn't crash
regardless but just to see what happens.
Could you also please file a
On 2014-06-07 19:05, Tom Browder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Didn't you mean htod? It doesn't work on Linux.
No, but I see now that I read your comment wrong. So yes, htod or DStep
would be the appropriate tool for what you need.
I just though you want to create C bindings for a D library, si
On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Tom Browder wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d
> wrote:
...
>> There's already a tool for that [1]. It uses the JSON output from the
>> compiler.
>>
>> [1] https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/tools/blob/master/dtoh.d
.
On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On 2014-06-07 13:41, Tom Browder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
>
>> Again, my interest is in creating D bindings for a large C library and
...
> There's already a tool for that [1]. It uses the JSON output from the
> compiler.
>
On 2014-06-07 13:41, Tom Browder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Again, my interest is in creating D bindings for a large C library and
to do it auto-magically, and this discussion is very enlightening and
gives me some confidence that it is feasible.
There's already a tool for that [1]. It uses the
On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 6:41 AM, Tom Browder wrote:
...
> So the description in grammar.html is the official grammar
> specification for the stable dmd compiler. Is there a plain text
> version somewhere?
Okay, now I see that page source is:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dlang.org/
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 6:24 PM, Brian Schott via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On Friday, 6 June 2014 at 23:08:41 UTC, Tom Browder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
>>
>> What about the lexer and parser info on the D lang site in the
>> language reference. Is it current?
>
> https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi
On 2014-06-07 00:40, Brian Schott wrote:
On Friday, 6 June 2014 at 22:25:16 UTC, Tom Browder via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
Now I'm confused--the three files I've found have differences in
production rules--it looks like I'll have to look at what the
compiler is actually doing--I'm putting that off f
On Friday, 6 June 2014 at 23:08:41 UTC, Tom Browder via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
What about the lexer and parser info on the D lang site in the
language reference. Is it current?
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10233
Language changes in D have traditionally started out as compiler
chang
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Tom Browder wrote:
...
> What about the lexer and parser info on the D lang site in the
I should have been more precise and said the "lexical and grammar"
sections of the language reference. on the D lang site
Best,
-Tom
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 5:40 PM, Brian Schott via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On Friday, 6 June 2014 at 22:25:16 UTC, Tom Browder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
>>
>> Now I'm confused--the three files I've found have differences in
>> production rules--it looks like I'll have to look at what the
...
> Use th
On Friday, 6 June 2014 at 22:25:16 UTC, Tom Browder via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
Now I'm confused--the three files I've found have differences in
production rules--it looks like I'll have to look at what the
compiler is actually doing--I'm putting that off for a while
unless
someone has another id
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 2:26 PM, Brian Schott via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> If you somehow manage to get any parser generator to correctly handle D, you
> will be the first person in the world to have done so.
Oops, fools rushing in, eh?
> This may help:
> https://github.com/Hackerpilot/DGrammar/blo
On Friday, 6 June 2014 at 14:56:19 UTC, Tom Browder via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
Yes, thanks, but I really want one to use in Perl.
Any idea of the value of k in LALR(k) for D?
-Tom
If you somehow manage to get any parser generator to correctly
handle D, you will be the first person in the worl
On 6/6/2014 9:33 AM, Tom Browder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 7:00 AM, Robert Schadek via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
The site says it creates recursive decent parser. D does not even fit
into lalr1. So it will not work, unless you can inject handwritten parse
function for the criti
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 9:45 AM, Dejan Lekic via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
...
> Dscanner project has ANTLR grammer for D. It is unpolished, but works. It is
> on Github.
Yes, thanks, but I really want one to use in Perl.
Any idea of the value of k in LALR(k) for D?
-Tom
On Friday, 6 June 2014 at 12:05:36 UTC, Robert Schadek via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 06/06/2014 12:29 PM, Tom Browder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Can anyone point me to a text version of the D grammar in some
kind of
BNF or EBNF format? The D lang web site's info is close, but
it's
buried in html
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 7:00 AM, Robert Schadek via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> The site says it creates recursive decent parser. D does not even fit
> into lalr1. So it will not work, unless you can inject handwritten parse
> function for the critical parts
Do you know the k value for the D language g
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 7:00 AM, Robert Schadek via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On 06/06/2014 12:29 PM, Tom Browder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
...
>> My purpose is to attempt to write a D language parser in Perl using
>> Damian Conway's Regex::Grammars module (on CPAN).
...
> The site says it creates recu
On 06/06/2014 12:29 PM, Tom Browder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> Can anyone point me to a text version of the D grammar in some kind of
> BNF or EBNF format? The D lang web site's info is close, but it's
> buried in html which I'ld rather not have to wrestle with.
>
> My purpose is to attempt to wri
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 5:32 AM, Philpax via Digitalmars-d
On Friday, 6 June 2014 at 10:30:14 UTC, Tom Browder via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
>> Can anyone point me to a text version of the D grammar in some kind of
>> BNF or EBNF format? The D lang web site's info is close, but it's
>> buried in html w
On Friday, 6 June 2014 at 10:30:14 UTC, Tom Browder via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
Can anyone point me to a text version of the D grammar in some
kind of
BNF or EBNF format? The D lang web site's info is close, but
it's
buried in html which I'ld rather not have to wrestle with.
My purpose is to att
Can anyone point me to a text version of the D grammar in some kind of
BNF or EBNF format? The D lang web site's info is close, but it's
buried in html which I'ld rather not have to wrestle with.
My purpose is to attempt to write a D language parser in Perl using
Damian Conway's Regex::Grammars m
32 matches
Mail list logo
