On 06/06/2014 23:40, Brian Schott wrote:
On Friday, 6 June 2014 at 22:25:16 UTC, Tom Browder via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
Now I'm confused--the three files I've found have differences in
production rules--it looks like I'll have to look at what the
compiler is actually doing--I'm putting that off
On Saturday, 7 June 2014 at 17:46:06 UTC, Tom Browder via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Tom Browder
tom.brow...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Jacob Carlborg via
Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
...
There's already a tool for that
On 2014-06-07 23:16, Tom Browder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
That's another itch!
That's what the dtoh tool is for. It might create bindings for C++, I'm
not sure.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 2014-06-07 23:15, Tom Browder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Ditto.
It might be a while, though.
You can start by filing an issue, including the input source used. If
you then manage to reduce the test case that's even better. I just don't
want the issue to get lost.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 2014-06-08 10:33, Dicebot wrote:
AFAIR `gcc- E` output is not a valid C on its own, no wonder libclang
chokes on it. Using llvm/clang toolchain with dstep results in much more
pleasant experience (not surprisingly as dstep is implemented on top of it)
Hmm, it adds a bunch of lines looking
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 4:11 AM, Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 2014-06-08 10:33, Dicebot wrote:
AFAIR `gcc- E` output is not a valid C on its own, no wonder libclang
chokes on it. Using llvm/clang toolchain with dstep results in much more
pleasant
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 3:58 AM, Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
...
You can start by filing an issue, including the input source used. If you
then manage to reduce the test case that's even better. I just don't want
the issue to get lost.
Issue just filed as
On 2014-06-07 00:40, Brian Schott wrote:
On Friday, 6 June 2014 at 22:25:16 UTC, Tom Browder via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
Now I'm confused--the three files I've found have differences in
production rules--it looks like I'll have to look at what the
compiler is actually doing--I'm putting that off
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 6:24 PM, Brian Schott via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Friday, 6 June 2014 at 23:08:41 UTC, Tom Browder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
What about the lexer and parser info on the D lang site in the
language reference. Is it current?
On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 6:41 AM, Tom Browder tom.brow...@gmail.com wrote:
...
So the description in grammar.html is the official grammar
specification for the stable dmd compiler. Is there a plain text
version somewhere?
Okay, now I see that page source is:
On 2014-06-07 13:41, Tom Browder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Again, my interest is in creating D bindings for a large C library and
to do it auto-magically, and this discussion is very enlightening and
gives me some confidence that it is feasible.
There's already a tool for that [1]. It uses the
On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 2014-06-07 13:41, Tom Browder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Again, my interest is in creating D bindings for a large C library and
...
There's already a tool for that [1]. It uses the JSON output
On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Tom Browder tom.brow...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
...
There's already a tool for that [1]. It uses the JSON output from the
compiler.
[1]
On 2014-06-07 19:45, Tom Browder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
And Jacob, when I try your dstep on a header preprocessed with gcc -E
I don't get very far:
Could you try without preprocessing the file first? It shouldn't crash
regardless but just to see what happens.
Could you also please file a
On 2014-06-07 19:05, Tom Browder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Didn't you mean htod? It doesn't work on Linux.
No, but I see now that I read your comment wrong. So yes, htod or DStep
would be the appropriate tool for what you need.
I just though you want to create C bindings for a D library,
On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 2014-06-07 19:45, Tom Browder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
And Jacob, when I try your dstep on a header preprocessed with gcc -E
I don't get very far:
Could you try without preprocessing the
On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
...
I just though you want to create C bindings for a D library, since you asked
about the D grammar.
That's another itch!
Best,
-Tom
Can anyone point me to a text version of the D grammar in some kind of
BNF or EBNF format? The D lang web site's info is close, but it's
buried in html which I'ld rather not have to wrestle with.
My purpose is to attempt to write a D language parser in Perl using
Damian Conway's Regex::Grammars
On Friday, 6 June 2014 at 10:30:14 UTC, Tom Browder via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
Can anyone point me to a text version of the D grammar in some
kind of
BNF or EBNF format? The D lang web site's info is close, but
it's
buried in html which I'ld rather not have to wrestle with.
My purpose is to
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 5:32 AM, Philpax via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars- On Friday, 6 June 2014 at 10:30:14 UTC, Tom Browder via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
Can anyone point me to a text version of the D grammar in some kind of
BNF or EBNF format? The D lang web site's info is close, but it's
buried in
On 06/06/2014 12:29 PM, Tom Browder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Can anyone point me to a text version of the D grammar in some kind of
BNF or EBNF format? The D lang web site's info is close, but it's
buried in html which I'ld rather not have to wrestle with.
My purpose is to attempt to write a
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 7:00 AM, Robert Schadek via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 06/06/2014 12:29 PM, Tom Browder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
...
My purpose is to attempt to write a D language parser in Perl using
Damian Conway's Regex::Grammars module (on CPAN).
...
The
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 7:00 AM, Robert Schadek via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
The site says it creates recursive decent parser. D does not even fit
into lalr1. So it will not work, unless you can inject handwritten parse
function for the critical parts
Do you know the k
On Friday, 6 June 2014 at 12:05:36 UTC, Robert Schadek via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 06/06/2014 12:29 PM, Tom Browder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Can anyone point me to a text version of the D grammar in some
kind of
BNF or EBNF format? The D lang web site's info is close, but
it's
buried in html
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 9:45 AM, Dejan Lekic via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
...
Dscanner project has ANTLR grammer for D. It is unpolished, but works. It is
on Github.
Yes, thanks, but I really want one to use in Perl.
Any idea of the value of k in LALR(k) for D?
-Tom
On 6/6/2014 9:33 AM, Tom Browder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 7:00 AM, Robert Schadek via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
The site says it creates recursive decent parser. D does not even fit
into lalr1. So it will not work, unless you can inject handwritten
On Friday, 6 June 2014 at 14:56:19 UTC, Tom Browder via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
Yes, thanks, but I really want one to use in Perl.
Any idea of the value of k in LALR(k) for D?
-Tom
If you somehow manage to get any parser generator to correctly
handle D, you will be the first person in the
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 2:26 PM, Brian Schott via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
If you somehow manage to get any parser generator to correctly handle D, you
will be the first person in the world to have done so.
Oops, fools rushing in, eh?
This may help:
On Friday, 6 June 2014 at 22:25:16 UTC, Tom Browder via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
Now I'm confused--the three files I've found have differences in
production rules--it looks like I'll have to look at what the
compiler is actually doing--I'm putting that off for a while
unless
someone has another
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 5:40 PM, Brian Schott via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Friday, 6 June 2014 at 22:25:16 UTC, Tom Browder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Now I'm confused--the three files I've found have differences in
production rules--it looks like I'll have to look at
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Tom Browder tom.brow...@gmail.com wrote:
...
What about the lexer and parser info on the D lang site in the
I should have been more precise and said the lexical and grammar
sections of the language reference. on the D lang site
Best,
-Tom
On Friday, 6 June 2014 at 23:08:41 UTC, Tom Browder via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
What about the lexer and parser info on the D lang site in the
language reference. Is it current?
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10233
Language changes in D have traditionally started out as compiler
32 matches
Mail list logo
