On Thursday, 11 June 2015 at 17:42:48 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Thursday, 11 June 2015 at 16:49:15 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
wrote:
On 06/11/2015 07:31 AM, Ola Fosheim =?UTF-8?B?R3LDuHN0YWQi?=
ola.fosheim.grostad+dl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, 11 June 2015 at 11:20:12 UTC, Kagamin
On Thursday, 11 June 2015 at 17:45:32 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
https://gist.github.com/sprain/be75c6c456146b272178
Ah, that's awsome! Instead of using true and false you get to use
thumbs-up and thumbs-down...
Exceptions are for when something went wrong. Returned errors
are for when the function can't do what you asked it to do, but
that doesn't mean that something went wrong.
You seem to be implying this as a fact, when traditionally this
is not how things are done.
For example, if you try to
On Thursday, 11 June 2015 at 11:40:55 UTC, Abdulhaq wrote:
It's quite a nice twist that the thread discussing which
language is better branched into what version of English is the
right one - as if such a thing is meaningful. Arguing about
definitions and terminology is surely such a useless
On Thursday, 11 June 2015 at 18:17:01 UTC, Dave wrote:
Disagree. Traditionally also handled by throwing exceptions. C#
throws a Format exception if a parse fails.
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/f02979c7%28v=vs.110%29.aspx
It seems to be a controversial subject:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/1090#issuecomment-12737986
As the topic has been argued for the past 50 years. No one ever
agrees
on the best way to handle errors. But I think most of this is
because programmers tend to be the most
On Thursday, 11 June 2015 at 11:40:55 UTC, Abdulhaq wrote:
Hear, hear, is it so unlikely that one footstep should fall in
the footprint of another?
We all stand on the shoulders of giants, etc.
This is it. Great languages (IMO) have condensed their features
down to the smallest set of
On Thursday, 11 June 2015 at 12:11:49 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
As a norwegian I can't make up my mind as to whether I should
write color or colour. I suspect it will be taken as some
kind of political statement. Hey, I am neutral! I use color
in source code and colour in writing. :)
I should also mention that D has essentially enabled this
philosophy that I am speaking about concerning errors by using
the 'scope' keyword. I believe handling errors with scope
literally translates to try\catch blocks behind the scenes. I
also believe this is an encouraged way of dealing with
D is really unique in the sense that it's open enough for
people not to feel that they have to role their own. D also has
enough features to satisfy many different users, although - and
this is often forgotten - you don't _have_ to use them all.
People like Go and Rust, because it tells them
On Thursday, 11 June 2015 at 13:05:14 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Thursday, 11 June 2015 at 12:42:36 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
People are not abandoning Dart because shows any signs of
being a dead or a bad language, they do it because they don't
trust Google.
My experience is many believe
On Thursday, 11 June 2015 at 11:37:21 UTC, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
On 10/06/2015 12:38, Ola Fosheim =?UTF-8?B?R3LDuHN0YWQi?=
ola.fosheim.grostad+dl...@gmail.com wrote:
I think Rust has an advantage over Go in the name Mozilla
alone, they
are more idealistic than Google.
Agreed. In concrete
On Thursday, 11 June 2015 at 12:15:21 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Thursday, 11 June 2015 at 11:37:21 UTC, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
On 10/06/2015 12:38, Ola Fosheim =?UTF-8?B?R3LDuHN0YWQi?=
ola.fosheim.grostad+dl...@gmail.com wrote:
I think Rust has an advantage over Go in the name Mozilla
alone, they
On Thursday, 11 June 2015 at 12:49:20 UTC, Abdulhaq wrote:
D is really unique in the sense that it's open enough for
people not to feel that they have to role their own. D also
has enough features to satisfy many different users, although
- and this is often forgotten - you don't _have_ to use
On Thursday, 11 June 2015 at 00:27:09 UTC, Dave wrote:
The promise of exceptions isn't to not have to specifically
handle errors in every layer
Correct me if I am wrong, but aren't exceptions in D used for
general error handling? Doesn't Phobos prefer exceptions over
return codes?
It seems
On Thursday, 11 June 2015 at 11:37:21 UTC, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
On 10/06/2015 12:38, Ola Fosheim =?UTF-8?B?R3LDuHN0YWQi?=
ola.fosheim.grostad+dl...@gmail.com wrote:
I think Rust has an advantage over Go in the name Mozilla
alone, they
are more idealistic than Google.
Agreed. In concrete
On Thursday, 11 June 2015 at 12:21:30 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
And Google will be right in abandoning an unsuccessful project.
Supporting such project wouldn't benefit anyone and reusing
resources in other promising projects is to the benefit of
everyone.
Actually, it is a problem that makes
On Thursday, 11 June 2015 at 12:21:30 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Thursday, 11 June 2015 at 11:37:21 UTC, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
On 10/06/2015 12:38, Ola Fosheim =?UTF-8?B?R3LDuHN0YWQi?=
ola.fosheim.grostad+dl...@gmail.com wrote:
I think Rust has an advantage over Go in the name Mozilla
alone, they
On Thursday, 11 June 2015 at 12:42:36 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
People are not abandoning Dart because shows any signs of being
a dead or a bad language, they do it because they don't trust
Google.
My experience is many believe in corporate backing. Is it just PR?
On Thursday, 11 June 2015 at 20:14:24 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Thursday, 11 June 2015 at 16:14:46 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
wrote:
https://youtu.be/VjNVPO8ff84 :3
https://youtu.be/bJDY5zTiWUk maybe this too(?)
Nono, the 80's was more like this:
https://youtu.be/Az_GCJnXAI0
On Thursday, 11 June 2015 at 16:14:46 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On 06/11/2015 06:52 AM, Chris wrote:
In your case, the song reminds me of:
Wouldn't It Be Good - Nik Kershaw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AYMAtbq0bjY
(God, I'm so old!) :-)
Oh man, that takes me back. 80's had the best
On Thursday, 11 June 2015 at 20:06:45 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Thursday, 11 June 2015 at 18:17:01 UTC, Dave wrote:
Disagree. Traditionally also handled by throwing exceptions. C#
throws a Format exception if a parse fails.
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/f02979c7%28v=vs.110%29.aspx
On Thursday, 11 June 2015 at 18:17:01 UTC, Dave wrote:
nothrow by default is combining the slowness of exceptions
with the limitness of returned errors. Why would anyone want
to do that?
How would something that is guaranteeing that exceptions won't
be
used, combining anything with the idea
On Thursday, 11 June 2015 at 20:44:52 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Thursday, 11 June 2015 at 20:14:24 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Thursday, 11 June 2015 at 16:14:46 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
wrote:
https://youtu.be/VjNVPO8ff84 :3
https://youtu.be/bJDY5zTiWUk maybe this too(?)
Nono, the 80's was
On Thursday, 11 June 2015 at 20:44:52 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
Nono, the 80's was more like this:
https://youtu.be/Az_GCJnXAI0
https://youtu.be/PN7dd2fW3OQ
https://youtu.be/Ug8WeZyTxXg
https://youtu.be/drGeLouMm6s
Ouch, guess will stick with modern art -_-
He is saying that now anything that throws will not only be
slow but also have the same limitations as returned errors.
nothrow by default is combining the slowness of exceptions with
the limitness of returned errors.
He literally said combine the slowness of exceptions. So I don't
know how to
On Thursday, 11 June 2015 at 21:57:36 UTC, Dave wrote:
assume I misunderstood him.
Yeah, its whatever, maybe I am misunderstanding him and your
original interpretation is correct.
That is a legitimate concern, but I don't think it is correct.
The transitive nature would enforce that you
On Thursday, 11 June 2015 at 21:53:57 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
Ouch, guess will stick with modern art -_-
The modern art of early 80s pop would be Yello and Art of Noise.
Music with a at-the-time new sample-based sound image heavily
based on these expensive beasts:
On Thursday, 11 June 2015 at 07:13:10 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Thursday, 11 June 2015 at 07:11:33 UTC, rsw0x wrote:
On Thursday, 11 June 2015 at 07:08:02 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
A ground breaking GC will emerge from the synthesis of the
unsurpassable number of endless GC debates.
On Thursday, 11 June 2015 at 07:15:31 UTC, rsw0x wrote:
Boehm's GC uses this and regularly kept up(~5-10%) with
essentially all of the top of the line GCs in all the papers I
read.
Ah, so you only read papers about very bad GCs, that explains it.
;)
On 2015-06-10 18:34, Joakim wrote:
May still be possible, Apple just announced that the default format to
submit apps for iOS will be bitcode from now on, which people are
speculating is some form of llvm bitcode:
I'm pretty sure they mentioned it was LLVM IR on the Platform, State of
the
On Thursday, 11 June 2015 at 03:04:50 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
The biggest difference between the D community in general and
other communities is actually quite simple.
Experience.
Indeed! The world has never seen a more experienced collection of
freshmen language designers. Theory does
On Thursday, 11 June 2015 at 07:08:02 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
A ground breaking GC will emerge from the synthesis of the
unsurpassable number of endless GC debates. That is the
sanctimony of meritocracy.
actually making a good GC for D is difficult because the only
type of barrier
On Thursday, 11 June 2015 at 07:11:33 UTC, rsw0x wrote:
On Thursday, 11 June 2015 at 07:08:02 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
A ground breaking GC will emerge from the synthesis of the
unsurpassable number of endless GC debates. That is the
sanctimony of meritocracy.
actually making a good
On 6/11/2015 6:40 AM, Dave wrote:
I believe handling errors with scope
literally translates to try\catch blocks behind the scenes.
Yes, exactly.
It should be noted that functional languages that utilize monads
often make you consider the exceptional case, and this is
enforced by the compiler (sound familiar?)
I also literally said with the limitness of returned errors..
That part is important part of the sentence. My point is that
the
On 6/11/2015 3:52 AM, Chris wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AYMAtbq0bjY
(God, I'm so old!) :-)
There's no business like compiler business:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=inzhNkQENOs
I'm in the compiler business:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DwIyClDuBgo
On Thursday, 11 June 2015 at 21:57:36 UTC, Dave wrote:
In regards to being faster, I'm not a big fan of exceptions in
the first place. This probably explains my perspective on them,
but I am familiar with their typical use case. And it's to
communicate errors. I'd much prefer something like what
On 6/10/2015 12:56 PM, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Please note, OED (which is the definition of the English language
whatever any USA upstarts may try to pretend) is gearing up to define
they as both singular and plural, thus at a stroke solving all the
he/she, she/he, (s)he, it
On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 19:57:15 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
Please note, OED (which is the definition of the English
language
whatever any USA upstarts may try to pretend)
Glad to hear it. Please tell your countrymen to prefer the '-ize'
suffix, as we colonials do, to the '-ise' one,
On Thursday, 11 June 2015 at 07:45:49 UTC, thedeemon wrote:
On Thursday, 11 June 2015 at 07:15:31 UTC, rsw0x wrote:
Boehm's GC uses this and regularly kept up(~5-10%) with
essentially all of the top of the line GCs in all the papers I
read.
Ah, so you only read papers about very bad GCs,
On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 18:13:53 UTC, Dave wrote:
D did get thread local storage correct, but I think people are
starting to get on board with having restrictions by default
because it prevents bugs (and the annotations are grepable).
Kind
of like what Rust is doing. If this is the case,
ready to be used option. This is
D.
Yes, Nim and Crystal have a couple of more years to go. Rust has
been backed by Mozilla for 6 years and is being used in
production projects, so I would not downplay the potential
uptake. I think Rust has an advantage over Go in the name Mozilla
alone
On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 01:21:05 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
On Tuesday, 9 June 2015 at 18:25:36 UTC, Dennis Ritchie wrote:
On Tuesday, 9 June 2015 at 18:02:55 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/396c95/of_the_emerging_systems_languages_rust_d_go_nim/
...
On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 07:40:23 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 01:21:05 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
On Tuesday, 9 June 2015 at 18:25:36 UTC, Dennis Ritchie wrote:
On Tuesday, 9 June 2015 at 18:02:55 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 08:17:05 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 07:40:23 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 01:21:05 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
On Tuesday, 9 June 2015 at 18:25:36 UTC, Dennis Ritchie wrote:
On Tuesday, 9 June 2015 at 18:02:55 UTC, Ali
On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 09:23:54 UTC, Chris wrote:
One big difference between the D community and other languages'
communities is is that D people keep criticizing the language
and see every little flaw in every little corner, which is good
and which is why D is the way it is. Other
ready to be used option. This is
D.
Exactly. Nim for example sounds interesting, however, we already
have D. I've used it for years and I know that it scales and that
I can write reliable real world applications in it. With Nim etc.
it would take years to actually know, if it scales or if you hit
On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 09:23:54 UTC, Chris wrote:
One big difference between the D community and other languages'
communities is is that D people keep criticizing the language
and see every little flaw in every little corner, which is good
and which is why D is the way it is.
Or
On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 16:02:36 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
Yeah, I think it would be nice if one could change the culture
of programming so that people easily could combine any 2
languages in the same project.
But shouldn't there be one language that's right for everyone?
(BTW I
On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 16:22:51 UTC, Idan Arye wrote:
Wasn't LLVM supposed to solve that, being a virtual machine
for compilation to low level native code?
May still be possible, Apple just announced that the default
format to submit apps for iOS will be bitcode from now on, which
On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 16:02:36 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
Probably related to the main creator's programming-experience,
but as far as credits go one should really credit the first
language/author to bring about a concept. (e.g. Lisp, Simula,
BCPL etc)
I wonder why Walter was
On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 14:29:51 UTC, Thiez wrote:
On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 09:23:54 UTC, Chris wrote:
One big difference between the D community and other
languages' communities is is that D people keep criticizing
the language and see every little flaw in every little corner,
in the same project. But that takes either significant
creator-goodwill/cooperation or platforms like .NET/JVM. I could
see myself wanting to do some things in Prolog, some things in
Lisp and some things in C. Today that takes too much FFI work.
A problem that both Nim and D share is that they aim broad
On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 16:02:36 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
Yeah, I think it would be nice if one could change the culture
of programming so that people easily could combine any 2
languages in the same project. But that takes either
significant creator-goodwill/cooperation or
On 06/10/2015 09:05 PM, Ola Fosheim =?UTF-8?B?R3LDuHN0YWQi?=
ola.fosheim.grostad+dl...@gmail.com wrote:
...
At some point you just have question intent if there is a
misunderstanding, rather than control every expression or else
everything becomes it:
A bad programmer create bugs when it edits
On 6/10/15 12:56 PM, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Please note, OED (which is the definition of the English language
whatever any USA upstarts may try to pretend) is gearing up to define
they as both singular and plural, thus at a stroke solving all the
he/she, she/he, (s)he, it
On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 18:41:56 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 18:18:55 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
It's always a good idea to not go personal, but I think they
overdo it when you're not allowed to write he as a general
term because it is gender specific.
On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 19:05:15 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
Sure, follow your own ethics, but that won't work in an
international environment as a rule without coming off as
censorship. You cannot force people globally to follow a local
culture.
True, and a question of balance. A
On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 09:23:54 UTC, Chris wrote:
One big difference between the D community and other languages'
communities is is that D people keep criticizing the language
and see every little flaw in every little corner, which is good
and which is why D is the way it is. Other
I'm not really familiar with Go, Nim, or Crystal, but I spent
some time learning about Rust yesterday. I thought it was pretty
interesting. In particular,
1) The GC is optional (memory safety is enforced by the type
system and #2).
2) Smart pointers with separate operators and support for
On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 15:13:41 UTC, Brian Rogoff wrote:
On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 15:09:21 UTC, anonymous wrote:
On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 15:08:08 UTC, anonymous wrote:
any community dumb enough to buy merchandise with a
programming language's name on it is full of idiots.
On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 19:22:37 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
Just use plural, it's what you mean anyway.
I was being ironic...
Variation is good for language. Artificial constraints like
gender neutral terms harm expression. It is not a reasonable
policy making arena in non-official
On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 18:13:53 UTC, Dave wrote:
On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 17:34:55 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
3) Immutability by default. Someone (somewhere) made an
interesting point that it can be conceptually convenient to
have the most restrictive choice as the default. I'm not sure
I
Please note, OED (which is the definition of the English language
whatever any USA upstarts may try to pretend) is gearing up to define
they as both singular and plural, thus at a stroke solving all the
he/she, she/he, (s)he, it faffing.
On Wed, 2015-06-10 at 19:05 +, via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 18:41:56 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
That's actually a good idea, you might not have noticed it, but
I rarely use he alone as a general term and I notice it when
other people do. Little things like this in language can make a
difference in people's feelings and
On 06/10/2015 09:34 AM, Joakim wrote:
On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 16:22:51 UTC, Idan Arye wrote:
Wasn't LLVM supposed to solve that, being a virtual machine for
compilation to low level native code?
May still be possible, Apple just announced that the default format to
submit apps for iOS
I usually agree that the more restrictive option should be the
default, but exceptions is... well... the exception. The whole
point of the exceptions system is to limit the number of points
where you need to worry about something going wrong to the
place where it happens and the places where
On 6/10/2015 9:22 AM, Joakim wrote:
I wonder why Walter was inspired to add modules to D, Walter?
It never occurred to me not to. Modules are hardly an innovative idea. It'd be
like not supporting the + operator.
On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 16:34:40 UTC, Joakim wrote:
Apple will then compile the bitcode for you on their servers,
before sending the final binary to users.
Thanks for the link. That's pretty interesting. I suspect it
means they plan to change CPUs in 2 years or so. But it makes me
feel
On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 16:34:40 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 16:22:51 UTC, Idan Arye wrote:
Wasn't LLVM supposed to solve that, being a virtual machine
for compilation to low level native code?
May still be possible, Apple just announced that the default
format to
On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 17:34:55 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
3) Immutability by default. Someone (somewhere) made an
interesting point that it can be conceptually convenient to
have the most restrictive choice as the default. I'm not sure I
agree with that (maybe the most common choice used in
On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 17:34:48 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 15:13:41 UTC, Brian Rogoff wrote:
On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 15:09:21 UTC, anonymous wrote:
On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 15:08:08 UTC, anonymous wrote:
any community dumb enough to buy merchandise
On 6/10/15 10:54 AM, Brian Rogoff wrote:
The Rust community is probably the absolute best because tolerance for
that is near zero. Too much I think, but perhaps they're right and it's
for the best.
I'm glad to notice the tone of posts here, say, after DConf has improved
substantially. --
On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 17:54:15 UTC, Brian Rogoff wrote:
The Rust community is probably the absolute best because
tolerance for that is near zero. Too much I think, but perhaps
they're right and it's for the best.
It's always a good idea to not go personal, but I think they
overdo it
On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 18:18:55 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
It's always a good idea to not go personal, but I think they
overdo it when you're not allowed to write he as a general
term because it is gender specific.
That's actually a good idea, you might not have noticed it, but I
On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 18:13:53 UTC, Dave wrote:
Just a thought from a random spectator ;)
Interesting perspective. While I find the plethora of keywords in
D a tad confusing (nowhere near as confusing as rust's
borrowing!), I'm not sure it would necessarily mean that D would
be
On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 21:09:23 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 18:13:53 UTC, Dave wrote:
Just a thought from a random spectator ;)
Interesting perspective. While I find the plethora of keywords
in D a tad confusing (nowhere near as confusing as rust's
borrowing!),
On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 19:56:00 UTC, Dave wrote:
I usually agree that the more restrictive option should be the
default, but exceptions is... well... the exception. The whole
point of the exceptions system is to limit the number of
points where you need to worry about something going
There's a lot to like about D as a language.
Agreed.
On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 18:06:16 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 6/10/15 10:54 AM, Brian Rogoff wrote:
The Rust community is probably the absolute best because
tolerance for
that is near zero. Too much I think, but perhaps they're right
and it's
for the best.
I'm glad to notice the
On Thursday, 11 June 2015 at 00:57:34 UTC, Tofu Ninja wrote:
On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 20:14:10 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
wrote:
Contrary to technical official definition, in REAL WORLD
usage, he is BOTH a masuline AND a gender-neutral pronoun. A
few occasional nutbags who deliberately ignore
On Thursday, 11 June 2015 at 01:30:08 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
'he' has been a gender neutral pronoun for centuries, and as
far as I'm aware this has its roots in latin using 'man'(vir?)
as a gender neutral pronoun.
I am just saying that personally it sounds odd to me to use it
that way and I
On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 09:23:54 UTC, Chris wrote:
One big difference between the D community and other languages'
communities is is that D people keep criticizing the language
and see every little flaw in every little corner, which is good
and which is why D is the way it is. Other
The promise of exceptions isn't to not have to specifically
handle errors in every layer
Correct me if I am wrong, but aren't exceptions in D used for
general error handling? Doesn't Phobos prefer exceptions over
return codes?
it's to not care about exceptions in every layer.
My second job
On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 20:14:10 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Contrary to technical official definition, in REAL WORLD usage,
he is BOTH a masuline AND a gender-neutral pronoun. A few
occasional nutbags who deliberately ignore the gender-neutral
possibility in order to promote their you
On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 19:57:15 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
Please note, OED (which is the definition of the English
language
OED is a reflection(an approximate one at that) of what the
English language is, not the definition.
On 11/06/2015 3:37 a.m., Chris wrote:
On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 14:29:51 UTC, Thiez wrote:
On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 09:23:54 UTC, Chris wrote:
One big difference between the D community and other languages'
communities is is that D people keep criticizing the language and see
every
On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 15:08:08 UTC, anonymous wrote:
any community dumb enough to buy merchandise with a programming
language's name on it is full of idiots.
bye.
p.s., Nim has the absolute worst community out of any of these
languages.
On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 14:29:51 UTC, Thiez wrote:
On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 09:23:54 UTC, Chris wrote:
One big difference between the D community and other
languages' communities is is that D people keep criticizing
the language and see every little flaw in every little corner,
On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 15:13:41 UTC, Brian Rogoff wrote:
On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 15:09:21 UTC, anonymous wrote:
On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 15:08:08 UTC, anonymous wrote:
any community dumb enough to buy merchandise with a
programming language's name on it is full of idiots.
On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 15:09:21 UTC, anonymous wrote:
On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 15:08:08 UTC, anonymous wrote:
any community dumb enough to buy merchandise with a
programming language's name on it is full of idiots.
bye.
p.s., Nim has the absolute worst community out of any of
On Tuesday, 9 June 2015 at 18:46:48 UTC, Israel wrote:
Ruby that compiles?
Yet Rust, Nim and Crystal is a very young languages. And alas,
life is not eternal to wait five years of a flourishing language
:) There are already ready to be used option. This is D.
On 6/9/15 11:02 AM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/396c95/of_the_emerging_systems_languages_rust_d_go_nim/
Also found this:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/3971qf/this_week_in_d_dconf_2015_report_new_forum_site/
Andrei
On Tuesday, 9 June 2015 at 18:02:55 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/396c95/of_the_emerging_systems_languages_rust_d_go_nim/
I might've said D, but I don't think it qualifies as emerging
since it's over a decade old.
Well, it's just ridiculous, although
On Tuesday, 9 June 2015 at 18:25:36 UTC, Dennis Ritchie wrote:
On Tuesday, 9 June 2015 at 18:02:55 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/396c95/of_the_emerging_systems_languages_rust_d_go_nim/
And, by the way, I have never heard of the Crystal :)
Ruby that
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/396c95/of_the_emerging_systems_languages_rust_d_go_nim/
Ali
On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 01:21:05 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
D isn't an emerging language.
And that's a good thing.
Yes, of course. I just read the title of this topic:
Asked on Reddit: Which of Rust, D, Go, Nim, and Crystal is the
strongest and why?
And I do not read the name of the theme
On Tuesday, 9 June 2015 at 18:25:36 UTC, Dennis Ritchie wrote:
On Tuesday, 9 June 2015 at 18:02:55 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/396c95/of_the_emerging_systems_languages_rust_d_go_nim/
I might've said D, but I don't think it qualifies as
emerging since
Why D can not be done, as in the Go:
package main
import fmt
func main() {
var a, b, c = 1, 2, 3
fmt.Printf(%d %d %d, a, b, c) // prints 1 2 3
}
http://rextester.com/WICH50477
101 - 200 of 326 matches
Mail list logo
