On Thursday, 26 October 2023 at 03:39:19 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
I've heard from an expert insider source that Scala macros
destroyed the language.
The worst stuff I've ever heard about Scala, apart from
compile-speed anecdotes, is "Scala Collections: Why Not?"
On 10/28/2023 1:54 PM, bachmeier wrote:
I wonder if Walter has an opinion on this. In a .c file:
It looks like the author is self-taught with little exposure to other
programmers.
On Monday, 2 October 2023 at 17:28:19 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
It's been a long, long while since I published anything on the
blog. I do intend to get pick it up again down the road, but
Walter recently surprised me with plans of his own. He's taken
the topic of his DConf '23 talk and derived a
On Saturday, 7 October 2023 at 12:37:37 UTC, sighoya wrote:
I disagree however in all binary types should be just boolean.
I prefer machineState=State.On or State.Off than
isMachineOn=true or false.
This was finished possible:
```d
import std;
enum State : bool
{
Off, On
}
void main()
{
On 10/26/2023 2:30 AM, John Colvin wrote:
Good talk.
Many very clever people would achieve more if they tried to understand why a v.
experienced developer would care to spend so much time talking about what might
appear to be such basic points.
The key challenge: If this stuff was so
On Monday, 2 October 2023 at 17:28:19 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
It's been a long, long while since I published anything on the
blog. I do intend to get pick it up again down the road, but
Walter recently surprised me with plans of his own. He's taken
the topic of his DConf '23 talk and derived a
On Thursday, 26 October 2023 at 03:15:00 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 10/4/2023 12:50 PM, claptrap wrote:
Yes he can do what he likes, nobody has the right to demand
anything from him. But his position and experience and
knowledge is such that him doing a talk on coding guidelines
is
On 10/3/2023 8:10 AM, matheus wrote:
I understand the advantages of the UFCS, I was just pointing out that the
example given in that post are NOT equivalent, if it was deliberated or not I
don't know, but I think it was just a small mistake, otherwise the author
woundn't say they are
On 10/18/2023 11:51 AM, Max Samukha wrote:
On Tuesday, 3 October 2023 at 19:03:00 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
$0.
true
It's one reason why donations to the DLF go a long way. We try hard to squeeze
the most out of every dollar.
On 10/8/2023 6:21 AM, sighoya wrote:
I have another thing to add. You argued about reasons not to use macros but
these reasons don't apply to AST Macros, they won't allow constructing new
languages like in Lisp or in Neat.
Typed AST Macros would only accept parseable D source code with
On 10/7/2023 5:37 AM, sighoya wrote:
Thanks, I think we need more of this as D has become a large language already.
There were some points I even never considered before.
I'm glad it's a win for you!
I disagree however in all binary types should be just boolean.
I prefer
On 10/5/2023 10:21 AM, angel wrote:
I don't mind if it does not compile without the `ref`, but it should be on the
table - WYSIWYG.
It's a good point. Consider the refactoring angle. If I wished to switch from a
struct to a class, and vice versa, and can just change the definition. If `ref`
On 10/5/2023 6:30 AM, claptrap wrote:
While I agree with the overall gist I didn't find his examples very interesting
or convincing. They were pretty much all made up to illustrate, outdated, or
disingenuous (the first one with the intentionally obfuscated code).
I know they look trivial, but
On 10/4/2023 5:53 PM, claptrap wrote:
I have never once said he cant talk about whatever he wants to, I've explicitly
said the opposite. All I said is that by virtue of who he is has more
interesting things to talk about than whether "enum { yes, no }" is a good idea
or not.
When I stop
On 10/4/2023 12:50 PM, claptrap wrote:
Yes he can do what he likes, nobody has the right to demand anything from him.
But his position and experience and knowledge is such that him doing a talk on
coding guidelines is disappointing.
Considering how few people follow the coding guidelines I
On Tuesday, 3 October 2023 at 19:03:00 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
$0.
true
On Sunday, 8 October 2023 at 13:21:12 UTC, sighoya wrote:
On Monday, 2 October 2023 at 17:28:19 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
[...]
I have another thing to add. You argued about reasons not to
use macros but these reasons don't apply to AST Macros, they
won't allow constructing new languages like
On Monday, 2 October 2023 at 17:28:19 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
[...]
I have another thing to add. You argued about reasons not to use
macros but these reasons don't apply to AST Macros, they won't
allow constructing new languages like in Lisp or in Neat.
Typed AST Macros would only accept
On Monday, 2 October 2023 at 17:28:19 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
It's been a long, long while since I published anything on the
blog. I do intend to get pick it up again down the road, but
Walter recently surprised me with plans of his own. He's taken
the topic of his DConf '23 talk and derived a
I think if `class` is a reference type, it should've been
explicit:
```sh
class C {
...
}
auto obj = new C();
void func(ref C obj)
{
...
}
```
I don't mind if it does not compile without the `ref`, but it
should be on the table - WYSIWYG.
On Thursday, 5 October 2023 at 08:46:50 UTC, Dom DiSc wrote:
On Thursday, 5 October 2023 at 00:53:45 UTC, claptrap wrote:
[...] he is has more interesting things to talk about than
whether "enum { yes, no }" is a good idea or not.
His point here was not that having an enum with values for yes
On Thursday, 5 October 2023 at 00:53:45 UTC, claptrap wrote:
[...] he is has more interesting things to talk about than
whether "enum { yes, no }" is a good idea or not.
His point here was not that having an enum with values for yes
and no is a bad idea. The bad idea is assigning yes the
On Wednesday, 4 October 2023 at 21:03:14 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
On Wednesday, 4 October 2023 at 19:50:55 UTC, claptrap wrote:
On Wednesday, 4 October 2023 at 12:50:16 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
On Wednesday, 4 October 2023 at 07:26:25 UTC, claptrap wrote:
I personally found this talk very
On Wednesday, 4 October 2023 at 19:50:55 UTC, claptrap wrote:
On Wednesday, 4 October 2023 at 12:50:16 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
On Wednesday, 4 October 2023 at 07:26:25 UTC, claptrap wrote:
I personally found this talk very disappointing. Walter is
the head honcho and he's giving talks on
On Wednesday, 4 October 2023 at 12:50:16 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
On Wednesday, 4 October 2023 at 07:26:25 UTC, claptrap wrote:
I personally found this talk very disappointing. Walter is the
head honcho and he's giving talks on coding guidelines?
Its like visiting the F1 engineering workshop
On Wednesday, 4 October 2023 at 07:26:25 UTC, claptrap wrote:
I personally found this talk very disappointing. Walter is the
head honcho and he's giving talks on coding guidelines?
Its like visiting the F1 engineering workshop and getting a
talk on health and safety.
Tell us the engine,
On Monday, 2 October 2023 at 17:28:19 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
It's been a long, long while since I published anything on the
blog. I do intend to get pick it up again down the road, but
Walter recently surprised me with plans of his own. He's taken
the topic of his DConf '23 talk and derived a
On Tuesday, 3 October 2023 at 13:39:33 UTC, user1234 wrote:
A message specifically dedicated for you, Mike.
According to me there is a problem in the blog. Author and
publication date should be put on top of an entry (currently
the information are only at the bottom).
Yes, I agree. That's
On 04/10/2023 8:03 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 10/3/2023 12:36 AM, Max Samukha wrote:
'No hire' for language designers who design sum types to be implicitly
enumerated and convertible to integers and booleans?
There's a reason my salary from the D Foundation is $0.
As long as its the tag
On 10/3/2023 12:36 AM, Max Samukha wrote:
'No hire' for language designers who design sum types to be implicitly
enumerated and convertible to integers and booleans?
There's a reason my salary from the D Foundation is $0.
HN front page, too!
https://news.ycombinator.com/news
On Tuesday, 3 October 2023 at 12:01:56 UTC, Martyn wrote:
Agreed. Even though I do like UFCS, I find the above confusing
to follow despite being more pleasing to the eye. I had to
break it down and, as Matheus already pointed out, looked
incorrect.
I normally avoid writing code like
On Tuesday, 3 October 2023 at 13:39:33 UTC, user1234 wrote:
On Monday, 2 October 2023 at 17:28:19 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
It's been a long, long while since I published anything on the
blog. I do intend to get pick it up again down the road, but
Walter recently surprised me with plans of his
On Tuesday, 3 October 2023 at 13:33:29 UTC, Dom DiSc wrote:
On Tuesday, 3 October 2023 at 10:39:19 UTC, matheus wrote:
I the first example "e" is receiving two arguments. While in
the latter "d" is being receiving whatever "c" returns and "3".
That's the point. In UFCS it is immediately
On Monday, 2 October 2023 at 17:28:19 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
It's been a long, long while since I published anything on the
blog. I do intend to get pick it up again down the road, but
Walter recently surprised me with plans of his own. He's taken
the topic of his DConf '23 talk and derived a
On Tuesday, 3 October 2023 at 10:39:19 UTC, matheus wrote:
I the first example "e" is receiving two arguments. While in
the latter "d" is being receiving whatever "c" returns and "3".
That's the point. In UFCS it is immediately obvious which
function receives the 3, while with all the
On Tuesday, 3 October 2023 at 03:17:44 UTC, zjh wrote:
Nice!
[chinese
version](https://fqbqrr.blog.csdn.net/article/details/133522267).
On Tuesday, 3 October 2023 at 10:39:19 UTC, matheus wrote:
Nice article but I think that I found a bug:
g(f(e(d(c(b(a))),3)));
a.b.c.d(3).e.f.g;
"That’s the equivalent, but execution flows clearly
left-to-right. Is this an extreme example, or the norm?"
Well I don't think they're
On 03.10.23 09:36, Max Samukha via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
'No hire' for language designers who design sum types to be implicitly
enumerated and convertible to integers and booleans?
import std.typecons;
void main() => assert(Yes.mate_hiringRedFlag);
On Monday, 2 October 2023 at 17:28:19 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
It's been a long, long while since I published anything on the
blog. I do intend to get pick it up again down the road, but
Walter recently surprised me with plans of his own. He's taken
the topic of his DConf '23 talk and derived a
On Monday, 2 October 2023 at 17:28:19 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/16y2h36/crafting_selfevident_code_in_dlang/
'enum { Yes, No }; is just an automatic “no hire” decision'
'No hire' for language designers who design sum types to be
implicitly
On Monday, 2 October 2023 at 17:28:19 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
It's been a long, long while since I published anything on the
blog.
Nice!
It's been a long, long while since I published anything on the
blog. I do intend to get pick it up again down the road, but
Walter recently surprised me with plans of his own. He's taken
the topic of his DConf '23 talk and derived a blog post from it:
On Saturday, 8 October 2022 at 15:33:59 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
...
`Good` article.
Ate Eskola continues his DIP 1000 tutorial series on the blog.
Part 1 covered slices and pointers. In Part 2, he explains how it
all works with references.
I want to thank Ate for his patience and his time with this one.
He sent me the first draft of this several weeks ago, and it went
On Monday, 15 August 2022 at 15:08:01 UTC, Adam D Ruppe wrote:
[...]
It's one of those things where it is better for learning a
language when there are a smaller number of orthogonal features
that can be built up into more complex things. @safe, pure, etc.
are good, but feel a bit hackish
On Tuesday, 16 August 2022 at 14:57:04 UTC, Guillaume Piolat
wrote:
I know it isn't really related, but currently on DUB there is 4
different @nogc nothrow string library, -betterC or not,
friendly licence or not, with various tradeoffs, and I'm about
to add another one.
Yeah. I think some
On 17/08/2022 3:05 AM, Guillaume Piolat wrote:
On Tuesday, 16 August 2022 at 15:01:05 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
But one key difference is it is designed to work with the GC even if
it is -betterC @nogc @safe nothrow.
How do you do that?
Via dub's injectSourceFiles (that I added).
On Tuesday, 16 August 2022 at 15:01:05 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
But one key difference is it is designed to work with the GC
even if it is -betterC @nogc @safe nothrow.
How do you do that?
And I'm building another.
Allocators already working, tons of Unicode stuff implemented.
Working on string builders atm.
But one key difference is it is designed to work with the GC even if it
is -betterC @nogc @safe nothrow.
On Monday, 15 August 2022 at 15:08:01 UTC, Adam D Ruppe wrote:
In my blog this week, I described an idea I've had percolating
in my brain for a bit about a user-defined effect system that
could potentially move nogc, safe, pure, etc to library aliases
- which would let you combine them as a
On Monday, 15 August 2022 at 16:16:35 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
The most prominent example would be something like vibe.d's
`@blocking`, which currently just acts as documentation, but
would be really useful if something like `@nonblocking` could
actually be enforced at compile time - currently
Am 15.08.2022 um 17:08 schrieb Adam D Ruppe:
In my blog this week, I described an idea I've had percolating in my
brain for a bit about a user-defined effect system that could
potentially move nogc, safe, pure, etc to library aliases - which would
let you combine them as a fun bonus - among
In my blog this week, I described an idea I've had percolating in
my brain for a bit about a user-defined effect system that could
potentially move nogc, safe, pure, etc to library aliases - which
would let you combine them as a fun bonus - among other things:
On Monday, 25 July 2022 at 02:59:41 UTC, electricface wrote:
https://forum.dlang.org/post/gsztclsvxdhnvfhbi...@forum.dlang.org
Looking forward to part 2 and part 3
Me, too! I'm hoping to make time for this and a couple of other
series that are long overdue for updates before the end of
https://forum.dlang.org/post/gsztclsvxdhnvfhbi...@forum.dlang.org
On Thursday, 27 May 2021 at 03:54:11 UTC, Виталий Фадеев wrote:
On Thursday, 27 May 2021 at 03:52:32 UTC, Виталий Фадеев wrote:
On Thursday, 27 May 2021 at 03:40:02 UTC, Виталий Фадеев wrote:
On Wednesday, 26 May 2021 at
On Thursday, 7 April 2022 at 13:02:26 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
Korpel. I'll have the video version published on our YouTube
channel within the next couple of days, and I'll link to it in
this thread.
The video version is available here:
https://youtu.be/rdHWTfi9-3M
Before someone points
I've written a bit for the blog about the major announcements
that many of you will already have seen here over the course of
January to March: the conclusion of SAOC 2021, the release of DMD
2.099.0, the DConf announcements, and the hiring of Dennis
Korpel. I'll have the video version
On Wednesday, 2 February 2022 at 23:03:57 UTC, Kyle wrote:
I thought this was a great example of a sweet spot for D. I
had similar work in mind way back when, and started writing a
Qt and VTK (data visualisation) wrapper to work towards this.
I'm wondering what they used for the visualisation
to D. Peter Jacobs,
Rowan Gallon, and Kyle Damm wrote a little about it for the D
Blog.
The blog:
https://dlang.org/blog/2022/02/02/a-gas-dynamics-toolkit-in-d/
Reddit:
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/sij99d/they_wrote_a_gas_dynamics_toolkit_in_d/
I thought this was a great
about it for the D
Blog.
The blog:
https://dlang.org/blog/2022/02/02/a-gas-dynamics-toolkit-in-d/
Reddit:
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/sij99d/they_wrote_a_gas_dynamics_toolkit_in_d/
This reminds me about SARC. They use D for hydrodynamics software
because (among other reasons
On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 11:40:09AM -0500, Steven Schveighoffer via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
[...]
> D error messages can be bad. Especially when you are using lots of
> range wrappers. It all depends on what you use.
[...]
True. I've had my fair share of WAT moments with D error messages.
to D. Peter Jacobs,
Rowan Gallon, and Kyle Damm wrote a little about it for the D
Blog.
The blog:
https://dlang.org/blog/2022/02/02/a-gas-dynamics-toolkit-in-d/
Reddit:
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/sij99d/they_wrote_a_gas_dynamics_toolkit_in_d/
I thought this was a great
On 2/2/22 11:32 AM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 08:14:32AM +, Mike Parker via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
[...]
https://dlang.org/blog/2022/02/02/a-gas-dynamics-toolkit-in-d/
[...]
Favorite quote:
"Good error messages from the compiler. We often used to be
On Wednesday, 2 February 2022 at 16:32:26 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Interesting that the author(s) found D error messages better
than C++, in spite of frequent complaints about error messages
here in the forums. :-P
No incompatibility there: "better than C++" is a very low bar.
On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 08:14:32AM +, Mike Parker via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
[...]
> https://dlang.org/blog/2022/02/02/a-gas-dynamics-toolkit-in-d/
[...]
Favorite quote:
"Good error messages from the compiler. We often used to be
overwhelmed by the C++ template error
On 2/2/22 3:14 AM, Mike Parker wrote:
The University of Queensland's Centre for Hypersonics has [a gas
dynamics toolkit](https://gdtk.uqcloud.net/) that, since 1994, has
evolved from C, to C++, and now to D. Peter Jacobs, Rowan Gallon, and
Kyle Damm wrote a little about it for the D Blog
about it for the D
Blog.
The blog:
https://dlang.org/blog/2022/02/02/a-gas-dynamics-toolkit-in-d/
Reddit:
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/sij99d/they_wrote_a_gas_dynamics_toolkit_in_d/
I thought this was a great example of a sweet spot for D. I had
similar work in mind way back
++, and now to D. Peter Jacobs,
Rowan Gallon, and Kyle Damm wrote a little about it for the D
Blog.
The blog:
https://dlang.org/blog/2022/02/02/a-gas-dynamics-toolkit-in-d/
Reddit:
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/sij99d/they_wrote_a_gas_dynamics_toolkit_in_d/
And HN,
https://dlang.org
about it for the D
Blog.
The blog:
https://dlang.org/blog/2022/02/02/a-gas-dynamics-toolkit-in-d/
Reddit:
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/sij99d/they_wrote_a_gas_dynamics_toolkit_in_d/
And HN,
https://dlang.org/blog/2022/02/02/a-gas-dynamics-toolkit-in-d/
The University of Queensland's Centre for Hypersonics has [a gas
dynamics toolkit](https://gdtk.uqcloud.net/) that, since 1994,
has evolved from C, to C++, and now to D. Peter Jacobs, Rowan
Gallon, and Kyle Damm wrote a little about it for the D Blog.
The blog:
https://dlang.org/blog/2022/02
On Monday, 24 January 2022 at 22:59:18 UTC, Adam Ruppe wrote:
On Monday, 24 January 2022 at 22:45:14 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
I am not aware of any association between "alpha" and "man"
because I hear both "alpha male" and "alpha female" in e.g.
nature documentaries.
It isn't really accurate
On 1/24/2022 1:57 PM, Moth wrote:
first: how exactly does assembly output relate to moisture vaporators?
Vaporators run on compiled code, so do understand the binary code of vaporators,
you'll need a disassembler.
I wanted to make looking at the binary code easy and fun.
second: what on
On Monday, 24 January 2022 at 22:45:14 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
I am not aware of any association between "alpha" and "man"
because I hear both "alpha male" and "alpha female" in e.g.
nature documentaries.
It isn't really accurate in nature either and when used with
people it tends to be
On 1/24/22 13:57, Moth wrote:
>> Reddit:
>>
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/sbn7n6/the_binary_language_of_moisture_vaporators/
> first: how exactly does assembly output relate to moisture vaporators?
Someone answered that question on the ycombinator thread. They included
On Monday, 24 January 2022 at 14:22:21 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
Some of you may be aware that Walter recently added a
disassembler to DMD. He writes about it in his latest post for
the D blog.
The blog:
https://dlang.org/blog/2022/01/24/the-binary-language-of-moisture-vaporators/
Reddit
On 1/24/2022 10:22 AM, Imperatorn wrote:
On Monday, 24 January 2022 at 14:22:21 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
Some of you may be aware that Walter recently added a disassembler to DMD. He
writes about it in his latest post for the D blog.
The blog:
https://dlang.org/blog/2022/01/24/the-binary
On Monday, 24 January 2022 at 14:22:21 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
Some of you may be aware that Walter recently added a
disassembler to DMD. He writes about it in his latest post for
the D blog.
The blog:
https://dlang.org/blog/2022/01/24/the-binary-language-of-moisture-vaporators/
Reddit
Some of you may be aware that Walter recently added a
disassembler to DMD. He writes about it in his latest post for
the D blog.
The blog:
https://dlang.org/blog/2022/01/24/the-binary-language-of-moisture-vaporators/
Reddit:
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/sbn7n6
Nice work, Max!
On Friday, 14 January 2022 at 20:25:22 UTC, Dukc wrote:
On Friday, 14 January 2022 at 13:37:11 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
The Blog:
https://dlang.org/blog/2022/01/14/using-the-gcc-static-analyzer-on-the-d-programming-language/
Reddit:
On Friday, 14 January 2022 at 13:37:11 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
The Blog:
https://dlang.org/blog/2022/01/14/using-the-gcc-static-analyzer-on-the-d-programming-language/
Reddit:
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/s3sh9p/using_the_gcc_static_analyzer_on_the_d/
Wow, it looks like the
all about profiling. Now, he's
submitted an article to the D Blog showing why the GCC static
analyzer is useful for D and how to use it.
The Blog:
https://dlang.org/blog/2022/01/14/using-the-gcc-static-analyzer-on-the-d-programming-language/
Reddit:
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comm
On 24/12/2021 16:24, rumbu wrote:
On Thursday, 23 December 2021 at 12:44:04 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer has been using D to teach a group of children to
program. He wrote about his experience for the D blog. Is D a viable
first language? See what Steve has to say about
On Thursday, 23 December 2021 at 12:44:04 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer has been using D to teach a group of
children to program. He wrote about his experience for the D
blog. Is D a viable first language? See what Steve has to say
about it :-)
The blog:
https://dlang.org/blog
On Friday, 24 December 2021 at 13:39:06 UTC, zjh wrote:
`chrome/edge/windows10`. I don't know why.
Use `ie`,I can access it.
On Friday, 24 December 2021 at 13:23:43 UTC, zjh wrote:
they have fixed it.
I tried it just before, no problem last time.
Then, I tried again here. It's circling all the time. You can't
see the `source code`,
`F12` can't either.
`chrome/edge/windows10`. I don't know why.
On Friday, 24 December 2021 at 12:55:40 UTC, matheus wrote:
they have fixed it.
On Friday, 24 December 2021 at 04:58:20 UTC, zjh wrote:
On Friday, 24 December 2021 at 03:53:07 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
Does the site crash e.g. with an error code or does the
browser crash? More information may help debug it.
Ali
Many times, it is estimated that a `JS` is too large to
On Thursday, 23 December 2021 at 12:44:04 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
The blog:
https://dlang.org/blog/2021/12/23/teaching-d-from-scratch-is-it-a-viable-first-language/
I agree about the bad error message with missing semicolons.
Looks like it inspired improvement!
On Friday, 24 December 2021 at 03:53:07 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
Does the site crash e.g. with an error code or does the browser
crash? More information may help debug it.
Ali
Many times, it is estimated that a `JS` is too large to load.
Not only did `the browser` crash, but even the
On 12/23/21 5:11 PM, zjh wrote:
On Thursday, 23 December 2021 at 14:48:43 UTC, zjh wrote:
every time I visit `https://dlang.org`,it crashes.
`wrong`,`https://dlang.org/blog`.
Does the site crash e.g. with an error code or does the browser crash?
More information may help debug it.
Ali
On Thursday, 23 December 2021 at 14:48:43 UTC, zjh wrote:
every time I visit `https://dlang.org`,it crashes.
`wrong`,`https://dlang.org/blog`.
On Thursday, 23 December 2021 at 12:44:04 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
https://dlang.org/blog/2021/12/23/teaching-d-from-scratch-is-it-a-viable-first-language/
every time I visit `https://dlang.org`,it crashes.
On Thursday, 23 December 2021 at 12:44:04 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer has been using D to teach a group of
children to program. He wrote about his experience for the D
blog. Is D a viable first language? See what Steve has to say
about it :-)
The blog:
https://dlang.org/blog
Steven Schveighoffer has been using D to teach a group of
children to program. He wrote about his experience for the D
blog. Is D a viable first language? See what Steve has to say
about it :-)
The blog:
https://dlang.org/blog/2021/12/23/teaching-d-from-scratch-is-it-a-viable-first-language
On Saturday, 17 July 2021 at 00:56:24 UTC, zjh wrote:
On Tuesday, 1 June 2021 at 11:57:34 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
Dylan Graham writes about his experience using D in a
I have translate this article into `chinese`:
[用d开车](https://fqbqrr.blog.csdn.net/article/details/118571177)
Thank you so
On Tuesday, 1 June 2021 at 11:57:34 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
Dylan Graham writes about his experience using D in a
I have translate this article into `chinese`:
[用d开车](https://fqbqrr.blog.csdn.net/article/details/118571177)
On Tuesday, 1 June 2021 at 11:57:34 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
Dylan Graham writes about his experience using D in a
microcontroller project and why he chose it. Does anyone know
of any similar projects using D? I don't. This may well be the
first time it's been employed in this specific manner.
On Tuesday, 8 June 2021 at 11:35:39 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
Testing backports of both now
([here](https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100935)
and
[here](https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100964)).
Thanks!
1 - 100 of 442 matches
Mail list logo
