On Monday, 8 May 2017 at 08:25:24 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On Monday, 1 May 2017 at 14:55:28 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
DIP 1004 is titled "Inherited Constructors.
Mike, given the general feedback I've received here, I think
the next best take of action is to split the implicit
inheritance
On Tuesday, 9 May 2017 at 12:52:38 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Monday, 8 May 2017 at 08:25:24 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
Thoughts?
It seems like the most sensible path forward. Mike ?
Works for me.
On Monday, 8 May 2017 at 08:25:24 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
Thoughts?
It seems like the most sensible path forward. Mike ?
On Monday, 1 May 2017 at 14:55:28 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
DIP 1004 is titled "Inherited Constructors.
Mike, given the general feedback I've received here, I think the
next best take of action is to split the implicit inheritance
proposal into a separate, smaller DIP, and update DIP 1004 with
On Tuesday, 2 May 2017 at 11:13:35 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 May 2017 at 09:03:27 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
100% in favor of the constructor behavior change in case no
constructor is in the derived class.
I think we could even split this up into two separate
proposals, because thi
On Wednesday, 3 May 2017 at 15:09:03 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 May 2017 at 12:58:17 UTC, Daniel N wrote:
The trick is that your child class need to have defined at
least 1 constructor before the alias.
This should work:
this() {}
alias __ctor = super.__ctor;
This will give t
On 05/03/2017 05:09 PM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 May 2017 at 12:58:17 UTC, Daniel N wrote:
The trick is that your child class need to have defined at least 1
constructor before the alias.
This should work:
this() {}
alias __ctor = super.__ctor;
This will give the error message y
On Wednesday, 3 May 2017 at 12:58:17 UTC, Daniel N wrote:
The trick is that your child class need to have defined at
least 1 constructor before the alias.
This should work:
this() {}
alias __ctor = super.__ctor;
This will give the error message you saw:
alias __ctor = super.__ctor;
this() {}
On Wednesday, 3 May 2017 at 12:46:19 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 May 2017 at 09:13:54 UTC, Daniel N wrote:
However I oppose the other part of the DIP since it's already
possible today.
class FileException : Exception
{
this(ErrorCode error_code, string file = __FILE__, uint
On Wednesday, 3 May 2017 at 09:13:54 UTC, Daniel N wrote:
However I oppose the other part of the DIP since it's already
possible today.
class FileException : Exception
{
this(ErrorCode error_code, string file = __FILE__, uint
line = __LINE__ )
{
super("FileNotFound", file, lin
On Tuesday, 2 May 2017 at 18:02:15 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 May 2017 at 09:03:27 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
100% in favor of the constructor behavior change in case no
constructor is in the derived class.
I agree.
So do I.
However I oppose the other part of the DIP since it's alre
On Tuesday, 2 May 2017 at 09:03:27 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
100% in favor of the constructor behavior change in case no
constructor is in the derived class.
I agree.
On Tuesday, 2 May 2017 at 09:03:27 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
100% in favor of the constructor behavior change in case no
constructor is in the derived class.
I think we could even split this up into two separate proposals,
because this part of the DIP is fairly non-controversial and
could be appr
On Monday, 1 May 2017 at 16:08:36 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On Monday, 1 May 2017 at 15:33:47 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Monday, 1 May 2017 at 14:55:28 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
DIP 1004 is titled "Inherited Constructors. [...]
All review-related feedback on and discussion of the DIP
should occu
On 5/2/17 11:03 AM, deadalnix wrote:
On Monday, 1 May 2017 at 14:55:28 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
DIP 1004 is titled "Inherited Constructors.
https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/DIP1004.md
All review-related feedback on and discussion of the DIP should occur
in this thread. Due to DCon
On Monday, 1 May 2017 at 14:55:28 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
DIP 1004 is titled "Inherited Constructors.
https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/DIP1004.md
All review-related feedback on and discussion of the DIP should
occur in this thread. Due to DConf taking place during the
review per
On Monday, 1 May 2017 at 19:02:11 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
1) Suppose my base class has 3 ctors, and I only want my
derived class to inherit 1 of them. Does this DIP allow for
that?
Initially when designing the DIP I haven't thought about this
use-case, but I've had more thought put into it rec
On Monday, 1 May 2017 at 18:34:43 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
so the fact that they now have different syntaxes was seen as
an advantage.
Yeah, I remember that decision. I don't think I've ever agreed
with it, though. :o)
We'll see.. I don't personally find it very important, I'm fine
with eithe
On Mon, May 01, 2017 at 02:55:28PM +, Mike Parker via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> DIP 1004 is titled "Inherited Constructors.
>
> https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/DIP1004.md
[...]
I'm appalled that the only discussion that has come up so far is related
to syntax rather than semantics
On Mon, May 01, 2017 at 04:08:36PM +, Andrej Mitrovic via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On Monday, 1 May 2017 at 15:33:47 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
> > On Monday, 1 May 2017 at 14:55:28 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
> > > DIP 1004 is titled "Inherited Constructors. [...]
> > > All review-related feedback on an
On Monday, 1 May 2017 at 15:33:47 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Monday, 1 May 2017 at 14:55:28 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
DIP 1004 is titled "Inherited Constructors. [...]
All review-related feedback on and discussion of the DIP
should occur in this thread. [...]
Destroy!
An obvious omission in the
On Monday, 1 May 2017 at 15:33:47 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Monday, 1 May 2017 at 14:55:28 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
DIP 1004 is titled "Inherited Constructors. [...]
All review-related feedback on and discussion of the DIP
should occur in this thread. [...]
Destroy!
An obvious omission in the
On Monday, 1 May 2017 at 14:55:28 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
DIP 1004 is titled "Inherited Constructors. [...]
All review-related feedback on and discussion of the DIP should
occur in this thread. [...]
Destroy!
An obvious omission in the syntax variations [1]
- alias this() = super.this();
or
DIP 1004 is titled "Inherited Constructors.
https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/DIP1004.md
All review-related feedback on and discussion of the DIP should
occur in this thread. Due to DConf taking place during the review
period, the period will be extended by a week. The review peri
24 matches
Mail list logo
