https://wiki.dlang.org/DIP88
I'd like to see DIP88 (Named Parameters) revived. Was this
proposal rejected or is it just stale and needs a refresh? Named
parameters can be implemented in a library, however, in my
opinion they are useful enough to warrant a clean syntax with
language support.
On Saturday, September 30, 2017 16:10:44 Jonathan Marler via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> https://wiki.dlang.org/DIP88
>
> I'd like to see DIP88 (Named Parameters) revived. Was this
> proposal rejected or is it just stale and needs a refresh? Named
> parameters can be implemented in a library, however
On Saturday, 30 September 2017 at 16:22:37 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
Effectively, all DIPs from that wiki that have not already been
accepted are dead, regardless of whether they stand any chance
of acceptance. For any DIP to be accepted, it will have to go
through the new DIP process, whi
On Saturday, September 30, 2017 16:57:09 solidstate1991 via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On Saturday, 30 September 2017 at 16:22:37 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
>
> wrote:
> > Effectively, all DIPs from that wiki that have not already been
> > accepted are dead, regardless of whether they stand any chance
> >
On Saturday, 30 September 2017 at 16:57:09 UTC, solidstate1991
wrote:
On Saturday, 30 September 2017 at 16:22:37 UTC, Jonathan M
Davis wrote:
Effectively, all DIPs from that wiki that have not already
been accepted are dead, regardless of whether they stand any
chance of acceptance. For any D
On Saturday, 30 September 2017 at 22:37:31 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Saturday, September 30, 2017 16:57:09 solidstate1991 via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Saturday, 30 September 2017 at 16:22:37 UTC, Jonathan M
Davis
wrote:
> [...]
What about DIP45, or making export an attribute? That would
On Sunday, October 01, 2017 01:54:24 Jonathan Marler via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> Hoping that someone will chime in and answer the original
> question. It's likely that only Walter or Andrei can answer it.
>
> Is it a waste of time for me to put effort into renewing this
> DIP? Is it dead on arriv
On Sunday, 1 October 2017 at 01:54:24 UTC, Jonathan Marler wrote:
On Saturday, 30 September 2017 at 22:37:31 UTC, Jonathan M
Davis wrote:
On Saturday, September 30, 2017 16:57:09 solidstate1991 via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Saturday, 30 September 2017 at 16:22:37 UTC, Jonathan M
Davis
wrote:
>
On Saturday, 30 September 2017 at 16:10:44 UTC, Jonathan Marler
wrote:
https://wiki.dlang.org/DIP88
I'd like to see DIP88 (Named Parameters) revived. Was this
proposal rejected or is it just stale and needs a refresh?
Named parameters can be implemented in a library, however, in
my opinion
On 10/01/2017 06:51 AM, Petar Kirov [ZombineDev] wrote:
On Sunday, 1 October 2017 at 01:54:24 UTC, Jonathan Marler wrote:
On Saturday, 30 September 2017 at 22:37:31 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Saturday, September 30, 2017 16:57:09 solidstate1991 via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Saturday, 30 Sep
On Saturday, 14 October 2017 at 14:49:27 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Yes, we're up for that. We need a strong folow-up here (in the
form of a formal proposal) from Benjamin and others interested.
-- Andrei
I myself might try to resurrect the issue (probably in the
forum), as a better DLL
11 matches
Mail list logo