On 2011-10-21 20:56, Marco Leise wrote:
Am 21.10.2011, 13:50 Uhr, schrieb Jacob Carlborg :
On 2011-10-21 10:07, Marco Leise wrote:
Am 21.10.2011, 09:22 Uhr, schrieb Gor Gyolchanyan
:
I wouldn't call it D. It looks like C, which smells like D. But the
point is good. It's possible to make a C
Am 21.10.2011, 13:50 Uhr, schrieb Jacob Carlborg :
On 2011-10-21 10:07, Marco Leise wrote:
Am 21.10.2011, 09:22 Uhr, schrieb Gor Gyolchanyan
:
I wouldn't call it D. It looks like C, which smells like D. But the
point is good. It's possible to make a C facade to use a C back-end.
On Fri, Oct
On 2011-10-21 10:07, Marco Leise wrote:
Am 21.10.2011, 09:22 Uhr, schrieb Gor Gyolchanyan
:
I wouldn't call it D. It looks like C, which smells like D. But the
point is good. It's possible to make a C facade to use a C back-end.
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011
On 2011-10-21 09:22, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
I wouldn't call it D. It looks like C, which smells like D. But the
point is good. It's possible to make a C facade to use a C back-end.
As a fist step DDMD is only converted to D with minimal changes. The
next step is to make it more D-like when you
Am 21.10.2011, 09:22 Uhr, schrieb Gor Gyolchanyan
:
I wouldn't call it D. It looks like C, which smells like D. But the
point is good. It's possible to make a C facade to use a C back-end.
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-10-20 22:29, Marco Leise wrote:
Am 2
I wouldn't call it D. It looks like C, which smells like D. But the
point is good. It's possible to make a C facade to use a C back-end.
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> On 2011-10-20 22:29, Marco Leise wrote:
>>
>> Am 20.10.2011, 13:11 Uhr, schrieb Jacob Carlborg :
>>
>>
On 2011-10-20 22:29, Marco Leise wrote:
Am 20.10.2011, 13:11 Uhr, schrieb Jacob Carlborg :
On 2011-10-20 11:38, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
Not a compiler (we have 3), only a front-end. Preferably in D itself
and preferably as modular as possible (e.g. not everyone needs the
semantic parser).
Provi
Am 20.10.2011, 13:11 Uhr, schrieb Jacob Carlborg :
On 2011-10-20 11:38, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
Not a compiler (we have 3), only a front-end. Preferably in D itself
and preferably as modular as possible (e.g. not everyone needs the
semantic parser).
Provided a good D front-end in D it'll be very
Definitely. It would be a standardized good-practice advice for all
compilers to use the standard D front-end.
This will ensure absence of non-standard shenanigans with the
front-end, preventing D from inheriting one of the biggest mistakes of
C/C++: non-standard extensions.
The pragma statements w
On 2011-10-20 11:38, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
Not a compiler (we have 3), only a front-end. Preferably in D itself
and preferably as modular as possible (e.g. not everyone needs the
semantic parser).
Provided a good D front-end in D it'll be very easy to make a great
IDE, even if it's GUI is bad.
On 2011-10-20 09:18, Jude Young wrote:
Well, I guess I'm just not used to all the fancy features.
=P
it does not show syntax errors. I did the lazy mans version, set a
button set to compile the current file without outputting anything.
It just shows errors.
no semantic errors, same as above
It do
Not a compiler (we have 3), only a front-end. Preferably in D itself
and preferably as modular as possible (e.g. not everyone needs the
semantic parser).
Provided a good D front-end in D it'll be very easy to make a great
IDE, even if it's GUI is bad.
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Jacob Carlbo
Well, I guess I'm just not used to all the fancy features.
=P
it does not show syntax errors. I did the lazy mans version, set a button
set to compile the current file without outputting anything.
It just shows errors.
no semantic errors, same as above
It doesn't handle ddoc, I wish it did.
It does
On 2011-10-20 02:34, Jude Young wrote:
Is Geany not a viable alternative?
It seems to support everything that I need out of the box.
what do you need that it doesn't do?
half asking to see if geany would be useful, half to see what tools
other people use.
Mirko Pilger wrote:
On 2011-10-19 21:35, Marco Leise wrote:
Am 19.10.2011, 13:40 Uhr, schrieb Gor Gyolchanyan
:
I've yet to see a single worthwhile IDE for D.
I think it would be a great idea to have a standard reference IDE
(just as DMD is the standard reference compiler).
These things would be so useful:
Inline
yeah. that sounds great.
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 11:35 PM, Marco Leise wrote:
> Am 19.10.2011, 13:40 Uhr, schrieb Gor Gyolchanyan
> :
>
>> I've yet to see a single worthwhile IDE for D.
>> I think it would be a great idea to have a standard reference IDE
>> (just as DMD is the standard reference
Is Geany not a viable alternative?
It seems to support everything that I need out of the box.
what do you need that it doesn't do?
half asking to see if geany would be useful, half to see what tools other
people use.
Mirko Pilger wrote:
>
>> I've yet to see a single worthwhile IDE for D.
>>>
>>
Am 19.10.2011, 13:40 Uhr, schrieb Gor Gyolchanyan
:
I've yet to see a single worthwhile IDE for D.
I think it would be a great idea to have a standard reference IDE
(just as DMD is the standard reference compiler).
These things would be so useful:
Inline compile-time ddoc and mixin views would
On 2011-10-19 13:40, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
I've yet to see a single worthwhile IDE for D.
I think it would be a great idea to have a standard reference IDE
(just as DMD is the standard reference compiler).
These things would be so useful:
Inline compile-time ddoc and mixin views would make devel
Mirko Pilger wrote:
I've yet to see a single worthwhile IDE for D.
http://dsource.org/projects/visuald
I'm using it too. I wish the author would move the source repository to
github. I think it may then attract more contributors.
I've yet to see a single worthwhile IDE for D.
http://dsource.org/projects/visuald
I've yet to see a single worthwhile IDE for D.
I think it would be a great idea to have a standard reference IDE
(just as DMD is the standard reference compiler).
These things would be so useful:
Inline compile-time ddoc and mixin views would make development
process so much easier.
Inline compile-
22 matches
Mail list logo
