On 2011-10-21 20:56, Marco Leise wrote:
Am 21.10.2011, 13:50 Uhr, schrieb Jacob Carlborg :
On 2011-10-21 10:07, Marco Leise wrote:
Am 21.10.2011, 09:22 Uhr, schrieb Gor Gyolchanyan
:
I wouldn't call it D. It looks like C, which smells like D. But the
point is good. It's possible to make a C
Am 21.10.2011, 13:50 Uhr, schrieb Jacob Carlborg :
On 2011-10-21 10:07, Marco Leise wrote:
Am 21.10.2011, 09:22 Uhr, schrieb Gor Gyolchanyan
:
I wouldn't call it D. It looks like C, which smells like D. But the
point is good. It's possible to make a C facade to use a C back-end.
On Fri, Oct
On 2011-10-21 10:07, Marco Leise wrote:
Am 21.10.2011, 09:22 Uhr, schrieb Gor Gyolchanyan
:
I wouldn't call it D. It looks like C, which smells like D. But the
point is good. It's possible to make a C facade to use a C back-end.
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011
On 2011-10-21 09:22, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
I wouldn't call it D. It looks like C, which smells like D. But the
point is good. It's possible to make a C facade to use a C back-end.
As a fist step DDMD is only converted to D with minimal changes. The
next step is to make it more D-like when you
Am 21.10.2011, 09:22 Uhr, schrieb Gor Gyolchanyan
:
I wouldn't call it D. It looks like C, which smells like D. But the
point is good. It's possible to make a C facade to use a C back-end.
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-10-20 22:29, Marco Leise wrote:
Am 2
I wouldn't call it D. It looks like C, which smells like D. But the
point is good. It's possible to make a C facade to use a C back-end.
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> On 2011-10-20 22:29, Marco Leise wrote:
>>
>> Am 20.10.2011, 13:11 Uhr, schrieb Jacob Carlborg :
>>
>>
On 2011-10-20 22:29, Marco Leise wrote:
Am 20.10.2011, 13:11 Uhr, schrieb Jacob Carlborg :
On 2011-10-20 11:38, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
Not a compiler (we have 3), only a front-end. Preferably in D itself
and preferably as modular as possible (e.g. not everyone needs the
semantic parser).
Provi
Am 20.10.2011, 13:11 Uhr, schrieb Jacob Carlborg :
On 2011-10-20 11:38, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
Not a compiler (we have 3), only a front-end. Preferably in D itself
and preferably as modular as possible (e.g. not everyone needs the
semantic parser).
Provided a good D front-end in D it'll be very
Definitely. It would be a standardized good-practice advice for all
compilers to use the standard D front-end.
This will ensure absence of non-standard shenanigans with the
front-end, preventing D from inheriting one of the biggest mistakes of
C/C++: non-standard extensions.
The pragma statements w
On 2011-10-20 11:38, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
Not a compiler (we have 3), only a front-end. Preferably in D itself
and preferably as modular as possible (e.g. not everyone needs the
semantic parser).
Provided a good D front-end in D it'll be very easy to make a great
IDE, even if it's GUI is bad.
Not a compiler (we have 3), only a front-end. Preferably in D itself
and preferably as modular as possible (e.g. not everyone needs the
semantic parser).
Provided a good D front-end in D it'll be very easy to make a great
IDE, even if it's GUI is bad.
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Jacob Carlbo
On 2011-10-19 21:35, Marco Leise wrote:
Am 19.10.2011, 13:40 Uhr, schrieb Gor Gyolchanyan
:
I've yet to see a single worthwhile IDE for D.
I think it would be a great idea to have a standard reference IDE
(just as DMD is the standard reference compiler).
These things would be so useful:
Inline
yeah. that sounds great.
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 11:35 PM, Marco Leise wrote:
> Am 19.10.2011, 13:40 Uhr, schrieb Gor Gyolchanyan
> :
>
>> I've yet to see a single worthwhile IDE for D.
>> I think it would be a great idea to have a standard reference IDE
>> (just as DMD is the standard reference
Am 19.10.2011, 13:40 Uhr, schrieb Gor Gyolchanyan
:
I've yet to see a single worthwhile IDE for D.
I think it would be a great idea to have a standard reference IDE
(just as DMD is the standard reference compiler).
These things would be so useful:
Inline compile-time ddoc and mixin views would
On 2011-10-19 13:40, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
I've yet to see a single worthwhile IDE for D.
I think it would be a great idea to have a standard reference IDE
(just as DMD is the standard reference compiler).
These things would be so useful:
Inline compile-time ddoc and mixin views would make devel
I've yet to see a single worthwhile IDE for D.
I think it would be a great idea to have a standard reference IDE
(just as DMD is the standard reference compiler).
These things would be so useful:
Inline compile-time ddoc and mixin views would make development
process so much easier.
Inline compile-
16 matches
Mail list logo
