Is it a good idea to silently statically accept duplicated keys
in both dynamic array literals and in associative array literals?
void main() {
int[] a = [0:10, 0:20];
int[int] aa = [0:10, 0:20];
}
I don't remember having ever had the need for this, and on the
other hand I have
bearophile bearophileh...@lycos.com wrote in message
news:befwnwpitihpcjfbd...@forum.dlang.org...
Is it a good idea to silently statically accept duplicated keys in both
dynamic array literals and in associative array literals?
Looks like a bug to me.
On 28.11.2013. 12:23, bearophile wrote:
Is it a good idea to silently statically accept duplicated keys in both
dynamic array literals and in associative array literals?
void main() {
int[] a = [0:10, 0:20];
int[int] aa = [0:10, 0:20];
}
I don't remember having ever had
28.11.2013 15:23, bearophile пишет:
Is it a good idea to silently statically accept duplicated keys in both
dynamic array literals and in associative array literals?
void main() {
int[] a = [0:10, 0:20];
int[int] aa = [0:10, 0:20];
}
I don't remember having ever had the need
On 2013-11-28 18:55, luka8088 wrote:
PHP also allows it:
$data = array('a' = 1, 'a' = 2);
And I find it to be only a source of bugs.
Arrays are a weird beast in PHP. They're both arrays and associative
arrays, at the same time, somehow.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 28.11.2013. 21:01, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-11-28 18:55, luka8088 wrote:
PHP also allows it:
$data = array('a' = 1, 'a' = 2);
And I find it to be only a source of bugs.
Arrays are a weird beast in PHP. They're both arrays and associative
arrays, at the same time, somehow.
Denis Shelomovskij:
File the issue please.
I have opened an issue, currently it's not an enhancement request:
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11637
In that issue I have also added more explanations and more code
examples, with an extra small discussion about arrays with
