On Wednesday, 7 August 2013 at 17:09:16 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Wednesday, 7 August 2013 at 17:01:36 UTC, Borislav Kosharov
I personally just avoid using them at all.
That's the danger that roots in the lack of clarity. And, I
cannot blame people outside thinking along the same lines about
the
On Wednesday, 7 August 2013 at 14:12:32 UTC, eles wrote:
On Wednesday, 7 August 2013 at 02:27:42 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 8/6/2013 4:28 PM, MattCoder wrote:
What I perceived: language should state on those several
ambiguous issues (@property was quoted, complex numbers) and
tools should ge
On Wednesday, 7 August 2013 at 14:12:32 UTC, eles wrote:
What I perceived: language should state on those several
ambiguous issues (@property was quoted, complex numbers) and
tools should get some maturity (the .so thing for one).
I think it is a very important moment that is often
underestim
On Wednesday, 7 August 2013 at 17:01:36 UTC, Borislav Kosharov
wrote:
Yea, I don't like how you have to write properties in D. I
usually write them like this:
@property {
int myNum() {
return _myNum;
}
void myNum(int value) {
_myNum = value;
}
}
I saw that in the
On Wednesday, 7 August 2013 at 14:12:32 UTC, eles wrote:
On Wednesday, 7 August 2013 at 02:27:42 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 8/6/2013 4:28 PM, MattCoder wrote:
It simply isn't enough to create a great product.
I did try. At my job. Basically, answers that I received were
like: "it's unfinish
On Wednesday, 7 August 2013 at 02:27:42 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 8/6/2013 4:28 PM, MattCoder wrote:
It simply isn't enough to create a great product.
I did try. At my job. Basically, answers that I received were
like: "it's unfinished." (they meant language is changing and
tools are immat
On Tuesday, 6 August 2013 at 23:28:44 UTC, MattCoder wrote:
I don't think you should just compare programmers/developers
with entrepreneurs like you did. Of course there are
programmers who market/promote their own software, but most
don't or at least not like an entrepreneur would do.
Mayb
On 8/6/2013 3:24 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 2013-08-06 17:13:19 +, Walter Bright said:
On 8/6/2013 5:32 AM, "Luís Marques" " wrote:
On Tuesday, 6 August 2013 at 08:12:26 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
DrDobbs has always been good to me and my efforts, even in the 1980s. The
editors, fir
On 8/6/2013 4:28 PM, MattCoder wrote:
Another example is Steve Jobs, how many games he promoted at Atari? None, on the
other hand he promoted the first Apple Computer, but who built that machine was
the by the other Steve.
Few of us are lucky enough to have a Steve Jobs to promote what we do.
On Monday, 5 August 2013 at 19:44:12 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
...
I know that people often are reluctant to promote their own
stuff because they feel it's immodest. All I can say is get
over it! Look at Donald Trump, Steve Jobs, Gene Simmons, Jeff
Bezos, Elon Musk, etc. None of them are/were
On 2013-08-06 17:13:19 +, Walter Bright said:
On 8/6/2013 5:32 AM, "Luís Marques" " wrote:
On Tuesday, 6 August 2013 at 08:12:26 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
DrDobbs has always been good to me and my efforts, even in the 1980s. The
editors, first Jon Erickson and now Andrew Binstock, are a pl
On 8/6/2013 5:32 AM, "Luís Marques" " wrote:
On Tuesday, 6 August 2013 at 08:12:26 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
DrDobbs has always been good to me and my efforts, even in the 1980s. The
editors, first Jon Erickson and now Andrew Binstock, are a pleasure to work
with. DrDobbs is a great way to reach
On Tuesday, 6 August 2013 at 08:12:26 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
DrDobbs has always been good to me and my efforts, even in the
1980s. The editors, first Jon Erickson and now Andrew Binstock,
are a pleasure to work with. DrDobbs is a great way to reach a
wider programming audience.
How does it
On Monday, 5 August 2013 at 19:44:12 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Throwing code up on github isn't good enough. Expecting people
to read the source code to figure out who/what/where/etc is
never going to work.
No pun intendended, but this is also why I fought for a better
changelog at that time.
On 8/5/2013 11:01 PM, qznc wrote:
You seem to like DrDobbs for publishing your articles. How are
they?
DrDobbs has always been good to me and my efforts, even in the 1980s. The
editors, first Jon Erickson and now Andrew Binstock, are a pleasure to work
with. DrDobbs is a great way to reach a
On Monday, 5 August 2013 at 19:44:12 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
This is a bit of a generic reply to a constant theme I see here.
It pains me to see a lot of great D projects languish in
obscurity, and often the author(s) eventually get frustrated
with that and abandon them.
The problem is tha
On Tuesday, August 06, 2013 05:44:25 Jeremy DeHaan wrote:
> I promise I will write some stuff and post in the announce
> section once I have a little more time.(classes are currently
> destroying me)
Then switch to structs. ;)
- Jonathan M Davis
On 8/5/2013 8:44 PM, Jeremy DeHaan wrote:
I think my problem is that there are so many people in the D community that I
would consider MUCH better at software development than myself, so I get pretty
self conscious when it comes to me talking about my stuff. You're right though,
I should definite
On Monday, 5 August 2013 at 19:44:12 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
This is a bit of a generic reply to a constant theme I see here.
It pains me to see a lot of great D projects languish in
obscurity, and often the author(s) eventually get frustrated
with that and abandon them.
The problem is tha
On 8/5/2013 2:14 PM, Borislav Kosharov wrote:
Wow Walter, your post really motivated me right now. For a few days I have this
idea about an next gen OS. I only told it to my friends and I haven't written it
anywhere(but I was planing to). Now I will probably create a blog and start
writing progra
On 8/5/2013 2:51 PM, Gambler wrote:
On a related note, I almost never hear about D projects on Hacker News.
It's a good place for language promition. Heck, even vanilla github
project get up-voted there if they have some kind of cool factor to them.
I've posted a number of articles about D on
On Monday, 5 August 2013 at 21:51:56 UTC, Gambler wrote:
On 8/5/2013 3:44 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
Throwing code up on github isn't good enough.
On a related note, I almost never hear about D projects on
Hacker News.
It's a good place for language promition. Heck, even vanilla
github
project
On 8/5/2013 3:44 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
> Throwing code up on github isn't good enough.
On a related note, I almost never hear about D projects on Hacker News.
It's a good place for language promition. Heck, even vanilla github
project get up-voted there if they have some kind of cool factor to
On Monday, 5 August 2013 at 19:44:12 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
This is a bit of a generic reply to a constant theme I see here.
It pains me to see a lot of great D projects languish in
obscurity, and often the author(s) eventually get frustrated
with that and abandon them.
The problem is tha
This is a bit of a generic reply to a constant theme I see here.
It pains me to see a lot of great D projects languish in obscurity, and often
the author(s) eventually get frustrated with that and abandon them.
The problem is that "Field of Dreams", i.e. "build it and they will come" is a
Hol
25 matches
Mail list logo
