On Sunday, 7 July 2013 at 13:42:52 UTC, Tommi wrote:
Then, yet another solution (a code breaking one) would be to
make it so that only literally saying:
assert(0);
or
assert(false);
or
assert(null);
...would exhibit that special assert behaviour.
Anything else would be semantically runtime-eva
On Sunday, 7 July 2013 at 13:12:06 UTC, Tommi wrote:
But would it be possible to implement it something like:
[..]
Although, I don't know if the best possible behaviour is to
silently compile the following assert out of existence in release
mode:
version (assert)
{
enum cond = false;
}
07.07.2013 17:12, Tommi пишет:
On Sunday, 7 July 2013 at 12:30:28 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 7/7/13, Tommi wrote:
Sometimes you need to have some extra data to check against in
the assert expression. That data isn't needed in release mode
when assertions are ignored. Therefore, you put tha
On Sunday, 7 July 2013 at 13:12:06 UTC, Tommi wrote:
[..] Then, when parsing assert expressions, if an undefined
symbol is found, the compiler would check that separate list of
symbols that it has been keeping, and if the symbol is found
there and use of the symbol is syntactically correct, the
On Sunday, 7 July 2013 at 12:30:28 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 7/7/13, Tommi wrote:
Sometimes you need to have some extra data to check against in
the assert expression. That data isn't needed in release mode
when assertions are ignored. Therefore, you put that extra data
inside a version(as
On Sunday, 7 July 2013 at 12:30:28 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
I've ran into an issue when implementing this feature back in
February
(see the pull request):
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9450
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/1614
WTF:
Hmm.. I think we migh
On 7/7/13, Tommi wrote:
> Sometimes you need to have some extra data to check against in
> the assert expression. That data isn't needed in release mode
> when assertions are ignored. Therefore, you put that extra data
> inside a version(assert). But then those assertions fail to
> compile in rele
Sometimes you need to have some extra data to check against in
the assert expression. That data isn't needed in release mode
when assertions are ignored. Therefore, you put that extra data
inside a version(assert). But then those assertions fail to
compile in release mode because the symbol loo
