I'm coming up against some interesting challenges while porting stuff in my utility
library to D2.
Firstly, D2 uses opBinary and opOpAssign, rather than the operator-specific op* and
op*Assign. While the latter still work, they aren't mentioned in the current D2 docs.
Which would imply that t
On 26 March 2012 11:36, Stewart Gordon wrote:
> I'm coming up against some interesting challenges while porting stuff in my
> utility library to D2.
>
> Firstly, D2 uses opBinary and opOpAssign, rather than the operator-specific
> op* and op*Assign. While the latter still work, they aren't mentio
On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 00:36:08 +0200, Stewart Gordon
wrote:
I'm coming up against some interesting challenges while porting stuff in
my utility library to D2.
Firstly, D2 uses opBinary and opOpAssign, rather than the
operator-specific op* and op*Assign. While the latter still work, they
On Sun, 25 Mar 2012 18:36:08 -0400, Stewart Gordon
wrote:
I'm coming up against some interesting challenges while porting stuff in
my utility library to D2.
Firstly, D2 uses opBinary and opOpAssign, rather than the
operator-specific op* and op*Assign. While the latter still work, they
On 26/03/2012 14:37, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
So for now, I use the undocumented old-style functions. One other thing that
this
"wrapper" method loses is covariance, which I use a lot in dcollections. I
haven't filed a
bug on it, but there is at least a workaround on this one -- the templat
On 03/27/12 17:12, Stewart Gordon wrote:
> On 26/03/2012 14:37, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
>
>> So for now, I use the undocumented old-style functions. One other thing that
>> this
>> "wrapper" method loses is covariance, which I use a lot in dcollections. I
>> haven't filed a
>> bug on it, but
On 27/03/2012 16:12, Stewart Gordon wrote:
On 26/03/2012 14:37, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
So for now, I use the undocumented old-style functions. One other thing that
this
"wrapper" method loses is covariance, which I use a lot in dcollections. I
haven't filed a
bug on it, but there is at l
On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 11:26:08 -0400, Stewart Gordon
wrote:
On 27/03/2012 16:12, Stewart Gordon wrote:
On 26/03/2012 14:37, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
So for now, I use the undocumented old-style functions. One other
thing that this
"wrapper" method loses is covariance, which I use a lot i
On 27/03/2012 16:46, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
One tip -- if you are doing method as above inside a class and not an
interface, you can use:
cast(T)cast(void*)this;
which should avoid the unnecessary dynamic cast.
Which would work if the function always returns this. But in the general c
