Now that Andrei's much anticipated publication of TDPL is out, is it
time that D1 should now perish?
My personal feeling is that by cremating D1, time and effort can then be
better expended and focused on solidifying D2.
Cheers
Justin Johansson
On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 16:29:19 +0300, Justin Johansson wrote:
My personal feeling is that by cremating D1, time and effort can then be
better expended and focused on solidifying D2.
As in, stop updating DMD1 with bugfixes? Is porting DMD2 fixes to DMD1
that great an effort to warrant this?
Justin Johansson wrote:
Now that Andrei's much anticipated publication of TDPL is out, is it
time that D1 should now perish?
My personal feeling is that by cremating D1, time and effort can then be
better expended and focused on solidifying D2.
Cheers
Justin Johansson
I estimate that D1 ha
Don wrote:
Justin Johansson wrote:
Now that Andrei's much anticipated publication of TDPL is out, is it
time that D1 should now perish?
My personal feeling is that by cremating D1, time and effort can then
be better expended and focused on solidifying D2.
Cheers
Justin Johansson
I estimat
In particular, we should make sure that tutorials and documentation
should be updated to D2, or else clearly marked as applying only to D1.
Well should the current version be called just D rather than D2 and
simply pretend that D1 does not exist?
It should be turned around. D2 becomes "normal
Justin Johansson Wrote:
> Now that Andrei's much anticipated publication of TDPL is out, is it
> time that D1 should now perish?
>
> My personal feeling is that by cremating D1, time and effort can then be
> better expended and focused on solidifying D2.
>
> Cheers
> Justin Johansson
To whose
Justin Johansson wrote:
> Now that Andrei's much anticipated publication of TDPL is out, is it
> time that D1 should now perish?
>
> My personal feeling is that by cremating D1, time and effort can then be
> better expended and focused on solidifying D2.
>
> Cheers
> Justin Johansson
I don't th
Justin Johansson wrote:
Now that Andrei's much anticipated publication of TDPL is out, is it
time that D1 should now perish?
My personal feeling is that by cremating D1, time and effort can then be
better expended and focused on solidifying D2.
It won't, because the outstanding D1 spec probl
"Justin Johansson" wrote in message
news:hvt27i$hd...@digitalmars.com...
> Now that Andrei's much anticipated publication of TDPL is out, is it time
> that D1 should now perish?
>
> My personal feeling is that by cremating D1, time and effort can then be
> better expended and focused on solidif
Justin Johansson wrote:
> Don wrote:
>> Justin Johansson wrote:
>>> Now that Andrei's much anticipated publication of TDPL is out, is it
>>> time that D1 should now perish?
>>>
>>> My personal feeling is that by cremating D1, time and effort can then
>>> be better expended and focused on solidifyi
== Quote from Nick Sabalausky (a...@a.a)'s article
> "Justin Johansson" wrote in message
> news:hvt27i$hd...@digitalmars.com...
> > Now that Andrei's much anticipated publication of TDPL is out, is it time
> > that D1 should now perish?
> >
> > My personal feeling is that by cremating D1, time and
"dsimcha" wrote in message
news:hvthsj$253...@digitalmars.com...
> == Quote from Nick Sabalausky (a...@a.a)'s article
>> "Justin Johansson" wrote in message
>> news:hvt27i$hd...@digitalmars.com...
>> > Now that Andrei's much anticipated publication of TDPL is out, is it
>> > time
>> > that D1 s
Lutger:
> From reading
> the TDPL I get the feeling the language is somewhat more stable and focus has
>
> shifted, but not set in stone at all.
Future evolution of D2 will be more backward compatible (breaking backward
compatibility only in small situations), but the only languages set in st
On 6/23/2010 1:56 PM, dsimcha wrote:
== Quote from Nick Sabalausky (a...@a.a)'s article
"Justin Johansson" wrote in message
news:hvt27i$hd...@digitalmars.com...
Now that Andrei's much anticipated publication of TDPL is out, is it time
that D1 should now perish?
My personal feeling is that by
Trass3r wrote:
In particular, we should make sure that tutorials and documentation
should be updated to D2, or else clearly marked as applying only to D1.
Well should the current version be called just D rather than D2 and
simply pretend that D1 does not exist?
It should be turned around. D2 b
Eric Poggel Wrote:
> I think this type of fragmentation could only hurt things--and has
> already, except that phobos has become more open.
>
> With fragmentation you have less effort for each. One complete product
> is far better than two half-implemented ones.
The thing is that people will
On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 19:53:33 +0200, Lutger wrote:
> Do you
> think D1 harms D2?
I does in so far as people making libraries and wrappers don't support
D2. I think getting Tango onto D2 would be a very positive step.
Unfortunately, I don't think the maintainers are interested at all in
this, th
SiegeLord Wrote:
> Justin Johansson Wrote:
>
> > Now that Andrei's much anticipated publication of TDPL is out, is it
> > time that D1 should now perish?
> >
> > My personal feeling is that by cremating D1, time and effort can then be
> > better expended and focused on solidifying D2.
> >
> >
18 matches
Mail list logo
