On 2010-01-22 09:01, Simen kjaeraas wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 18:52:20 +0100, Steve Teale
wrote:
That this newsgroup was renamed digitalmars.d2. Probably > 80% of the
discussion here is on topics relating to the evolution of the
language. Don't get me wrong, as soon as D2 is stable, I'll be t
Nick Sabalausky Wrote:
> "Simen kjaeraas" wrote in message
> news:op.u6x1kkz2vxi...@biotronic-pc.home...
> >
> > IMHO:
> >
> > digitalmars.D --> digitalmars.D.dev
> > digitalmars.D.learn --> digitalmars.D.users
> >
> > D is not big enough to fork the groups in D1 and D2 IMO, but currently
> > th
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 20:54:11 +0900, retard wrote:
Fri, 22 Jan 2010 12:26:12 +0100, Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
Steve Teale wrote:
That this newsgroup was renamed digitalmars.d2. Probably > 80% of the
discussion here is on topics relating to the evolution of the language.
Don't get me wrong, a
Nick Sabalausky:
> Pet peeve, really. I've always found the semantics of post-inc/dec to be
> next-to-useless for anything besides obfuscation.
>From what I've read it's also a very good source of bugs :-)
Bye,
bearophile
Simen kjaeraas wrote:
Probably D.oldskool or something. After all, it's now a decade old...
D 1.0 is 3 years old, not 10. The plan is not to have a group for D 0.1.
Yeah, sooo last decade, isn't it ? :-) Oh well, guess it's time for D3 ?
But they can all live on the same D newsgroups, as far
"dsimcha" wrote in message
news:hjd1h5$2s3...@digitalmars.com...
> == Quote from Nick Sabalausky (a...@a.a)'s article
>> ++vote
>
> The more idiomatic convention on this forum is vote++. Is using ++vote an
> optimization in hope of making this happen faster?
Pet peeve, really. I've always found
== Quote from Nick Sabalausky (a...@a.a)'s article
> ++vote
The more idiomatic convention on this forum is vote++. Is using ++vote an
optimization in hope of making this happen faster?
"Simen kjaeraas" wrote in message
news:op.u6x1kkz2vxi...@biotronic-pc.home...
>
> IMHO:
>
> digitalmars.D --> digitalmars.D.dev
> digitalmars.D.learn --> digitalmars.D.users
>
> D is not big enough to fork the groups in D1 and D2 IMO, but currently
> there is considerable overlap between digitalm
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 18:52:20 +0100, Steve Teale
wrote:
That this newsgroup was renamed digitalmars.d2. Probably > 80% of the
discussion here is on topics relating to the evolution of the language.
Don't get me wrong, as soon as D2 is stable, I'll be the first to switch.
But where does th
Fri, 22 Jan 2010 17:28:20 +0100, Simen kjaeraas wrote:
> Anders F Björklund wrote:
>
>> Steve Teale wrote:
>>> But where does the current discussion leave those of us who want to
>>> use D and talk about the usage of what is the current mainstream core
>>> of the language - 1.055 - if I underst
Anders F Björklund wrote:
Steve Teale wrote:
But where does the current discussion leave those of us who want to
use D and talk about the usage of what is the current mainstream
core of the language - 1.055 - if I understand the situation
correctly? That should be digitalmars.D.
Probably D.
Fri, 22 Jan 2010 12:26:12 +0100, Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
> Steve Teale wrote:
>> That this newsgroup was renamed digitalmars.d2. Probably > 80% of the
>> discussion here is on topics relating to the evolution of the language.
>> Don't get me wrong, as soon as D2 is stable, I'll be the first to
Steve Teale wrote:
That this newsgroup was renamed digitalmars.d2. Probably > 80% of the
discussion here is on topics relating to the evolution of the language. Don't get
me wrong, as soon as D2 is stable, I'll be the first to switch.
But where does the current discussion leave those of us who
Anders F Björklund Wrote:
> Steve Teale wrote:
> > That this newsgroup was renamed digitalmars.d2. Probably > 80% of the
> > discussion here is on topics relating to the evolution of the language.
> > Don't get me wrong, as soon as D2 is stable, I'll be the first to switch.
>
> I think the name o
Steve Teale wrote:
That this newsgroup was renamed digitalmars.d2. Probably > 80% of the
discussion here is on topics relating to the evolution of the language.
Don't get me wrong, as soon as D2 is stable, I'll be the first to switch.
I think the name of the new language in the book is going to
Steve Teale Wrote:
> I don't believe that D aficionados are going to post many 'wow, this is cool
> - look at this' articles on the .learn group. They'll answer questions, yes,
> but with its rankings sinking, D needs more oomph.
Truth is that D aficionados don't really post those here either.
Jesse Phillips Wrote:
> Steve Teale Wrote:
>
> > That this newsgroup was renamed digitalmars.d2. Probably > 80% of the
> > discussion here is on topics relating to the evolution of the language.
> > Don't get me wrong, as soon as D2 is stable, I'll be the first to switch.
> >
> > But where doe
Steve Teale Wrote:
> That this newsgroup was renamed digitalmars.d2. Probably > 80% of the
> discussion here is on topics relating to the evolution of the language. Don't
> get me wrong, as soon as D2 is stable, I'll be the first to switch.
>
> But where does the current discussion leave those
That this newsgroup was renamed digitalmars.d2. Probably > 80% of the
discussion here is on topics relating to the evolution of the language. Don't
get me wrong, as soon as D2 is stable, I'll be the first to switch.
But where does the current discussion leave those of us who want to use D and
19 matches
Mail list logo
