Brad Roberts, el 8 de junio a las 09:19 me escribiste:
> Leandro Lucarella wrote:
> > Brad Roberts, el 7 de junio a las 18:53 me escribiste:
> >> Frits van Bommel wrote:
> >>> Brad Roberts wrote:
> I'm in the process of updating the version.html list of predefined
> identifiers.
>
Robert Fraser wrote:
> Robert Clipsham wrote:
>> Dunno if anyone else thinks this, but the operating system looks very
>> confusing with all the LDC only identifiers mixed in. I think it'd be a
>> good idea to find out which of them are "deprecated" and remove them, eg
>> only keeping one of eithe
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
> Brad Roberts, el 7 de junio a las 18:53 me escribiste:
>> Frits van Bommel wrote:
>>> Brad Roberts wrote:
I'm in the process of updating the version.html list of predefined
identifiers.
I'd like to include the identifiers that are produced by LDC as well
bearophile wrote:
> Brad Roberts:
>> I'm not particularly excited about the way this looks, but take a peek:<
>
> I can see names like:
>
> LDC
> LLVM
> LLVM64
> Win64
> Win32
> Windows
> D_Version2
>
> =>
>
> They may become more orthogonal, and there's no need to keep both LDC and
> LLVM:
>
Brad Roberts, el 7 de junio a las 18:53 me escribiste:
> Frits van Bommel wrote:
> > Brad Roberts wrote:
> >> I'm in the process of updating the version.html list of predefined
> >> identifiers.
> >> I'd like to include the identifiers that are produced by LDC as well as
> >> validate that there
Brad Roberts:
> I'm not particularly excited about the way this looks, but take a peek:<
I can see names like:
LDC
LLVM
LLVM64
Win64
Win32
Windows
D_Version2
=>
They may become more orthogonal, and there's no need to keep both LDC and LLVM:
Bit_64
Bit_32
Windows
Linux
Compiler_LDC
Compiler_DMD
Robert Clipsham wrote:
Dunno if anyone else thinks this, but the operating system looks very
confusing with all the LDC only identifiers mixed in. I think it'd be a
good idea to find out which of them are "deprecated" and remove them, eg
only keeping one of either solaris or Solaris etc.
Neit
Brad Roberts wrote:
Christian Kamm wrote:
Brad Roberts wrote:
Thanks. I've added them. I'm not particularly excited about the way this
looks, but take a peek:
http://www.puremagic.com/~braddr/phobos-
trunk/2.0/version.html#PredefinedVersions
Looks good to me. You've missed darwin (ldc only
Christian Kamm wrote:
> Brad Roberts wrote:
>> Thanks. I've added them. I'm not particularly excited about the way this
>> looks, but take a peek:
>>
>> http://www.puremagic.com/~braddr/phobos-
> trunk/2.0/version.html#PredefinedVersions
>
> Looks good to me. You've missed darwin (ldc only) thou
Brad Roberts wrote:
> Thanks. I've added them. I'm not particularly excited about the way this
> looks, but take a peek:
>
> http://www.puremagic.com/~braddr/phobos-
trunk/2.0/version.html#PredefinedVersions
Looks good to me. You've missed darwin (ldc only) though, while OSX works on
both ldc
Frits van Bommel wrote:
> Brad Roberts wrote:
>> I'm in the process of updating the version.html list of predefined
>> identifiers.
>> I'd like to include the identifiers that are produced by LDC as well as
>> validate that there aren't conflicts or contradictions between the
>> compilers. I
>> k
Brad Roberts wrote:
I'm in the process of updating the version.html list of predefined identifiers.
I'd like to include the identifiers that are produced by LDC as well as
validate that there aren't conflicts or contradictions between the compilers. I
know there was a thread about this a while
I'm in the process of updating the version.html list of predefined identifiers.
I'd like to include the identifiers that are produced by LDC as well as
validate that there aren't conflicts or contradictions between the compilers. I
know there was a thread about this a while back. What's the curr
13 matches
Mail list logo
