I've been trying to think of a solution to use over here at
Remedy for making the garbage collector reference count
allocations instead of the current scan method (even with Rainer
Schütze's GC it still does a scan, and I'd feel much more
comfortable not having to schedule a GC collection
On Tuesday, 13 May 2014 at 15:14:16 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 5/13/14, 6:43 AM, Dicebot wrote:
On actual topic of next step - I agree with Jacob, removing all
internal allocations from Phobos is most beneficial short-term
goal.
That's a given. This task and improving RC don't compete
On 5/15/14, 6:02 AM, Dicebot wrote:
On Tuesday, 13 May 2014 at 15:14:16 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 5/13/14, 6:43 AM, Dicebot wrote:
On actual topic of next step - I agree with Jacob, removing all
internal allocations from Phobos is most beneficial short-term
goal.
That's a given.
On Thursday, 15 May 2014 at 15:46:13 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 5/15/14, 6:02 AM, Dicebot wrote:
On Tuesday, 13 May 2014 at 15:14:16 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 5/13/14, 6:43 AM, Dicebot wrote:
On actual topic of next step - I agree with Jacob, removing
all
internal allocations
On 12/05/14 21:00, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
There's been a lot of talk lately regarding improving resource
management for D, and I'd like to figure the next logical step to take.
It seems clear that we have reached a collective impasse on a few
fundamentals, and that more just talk about it
On Monday, 12 May 2014 at 19:00:33 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
For that I'm proposing we start real work toward a
state-of-the-art std.refcounted module. It would include
adapters for class, array, and pointer types, and should inform
language improvements for qualifiers (i.e. the
On actual topic of next step - I agree with Jacob, removing all
internal allocations from Phobos is most beneficial short-term
goal.
On 5/13/14, 6:41 AM, Dicebot wrote:
On Monday, 12 May 2014 at 19:00:33 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
For that I'm proposing we start real work toward a state-of-the-art
std.refcounted module. It would include adapters for class, array, and
pointer types, and should inform language
On 5/13/14, 6:43 AM, Dicebot wrote:
On actual topic of next step - I agree with Jacob, removing all
internal allocations from Phobos is most beneficial short-term
goal.
That's a given. This task and improving RC don't compete (except, of
course, for bearing on the same people). I ask again,
On 05/13/2014 05:11 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 5/13/14, 6:41 AM, Dicebot wrote:
On Monday, 12 May 2014 at 19:00:33 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
For that I'm proposing we start real work toward a state-of-the-art
std.refcounted module. It would include adapters for class, array, and
On Tuesday, 13 May 2014 at 15:11:48 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 5/13/14, 6:41 AM, Dicebot wrote:
On Monday, 12 May 2014 at 19:00:33 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
For that I'm proposing we start real work toward a
state-of-the-art
std.refcounted module. It would include adapters for
On Monday, 12 May 2014 at 19:00:33 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
There's been a lot of talk lately regarding improving resource
management for D, and I'd like to figure the next logical step
to take. It seems clear that we have reached a collective
impasse on a few fundamentals, and that
On 5/13/2014 6:43 AM, Dicebot wrote:
On actual topic of next step - I agree with Jacob, removing all
internal allocations from Phobos is most beneficial short-term
goal.
I'm working on it. Could use some help!
There's been a lot of talk lately regarding improving resource
management for D, and I'd like to figure the next logical step to take.
It seems clear that we have reached a collective impasse on a few
fundamentals, and that more just talk about it all is at the point of
diminishing returns.
14 matches
Mail list logo
