02.04.2013 18:37, Nick Sabalausky пишет:
On Tue, 02 Apr 2013 11:20:26 +0400
Denis Shelomovskij verylonglogin@gmail.com wrote:
P.S.
Also, Nick, if you have time, could you show me, how do you suggest
to use D reliably in non toy Windows projects as you never said
anything against it?
On 3/31/13 22:02 , monarch_dodra wrote:
This is a two part post.
First, I wanted to pol how many users out there were developing under
OSX? [...]
The second part of this post is about a specific (OSX related) bug.[...]
I'm on OSX, know nothing about bug.
/k
On 4/2/13 4:45 AM, Denis Shelomovskij wrote:
01.04.2013 19:50, Andrei Alexandrescu пишет:
On 4/1/13 11:21 AM, Denis Shelomovskij wrote:
01.04.2013 0:02, monarch_dodra пишет:
Bitch please!
[snip]
Denis, the above (as well as most of the message that follows) is
entirely inappropriate.
Can't
03.04.2013 21:35, Andrei Alexandrescu пишет:
On 4/2/13 4:45 AM, Denis Shelomovskij wrote:
I'm worrying about newbies who can start using the language as there is
no warning on the main site about some shortcomings everybody have to be
informed about. Damn, `std.stdio.File` is positioned as an
On 4/3/13 3:40 PM, Denis Shelomovskij wrote:
03.04.2013 21:35, Andrei Alexandrescu пишет:
On 4/2/13 4:45 AM, Denis Shelomovskij wrote:
I'm worrying about newbies who can start using the language as there is
no warning on the main site about some shortcomings everybody have to be
informed
04.04.2013 0:54, Andrei Alexandrescu пишет:
On 4/3/13 3:40 PM, Denis Shelomovskij wrote:
This is Issue 7648 - std.stdio expects file names to be encoded in
CP_ACP on Windows instead of UTF-8 [1]. I also opened a pull with
cautionary note [2].
[1]
01.04.2013 20:19, Nick Sabalausky пишет:
On Mon, 01 Apr 2013 11:50:22 -0400
Andrei Alexandrescu seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
On 4/1/13 11:21 AM, Denis Shelomovskij wrote:
01.04.2013 0:02, monarch_dodra пишет:
This is a two part post.
The reason I'm worried about this bug is that the
01.04.2013 19:50, Andrei Alexandrescu пишет:
On 4/1/13 11:21 AM, Denis Shelomovskij wrote:
01.04.2013 0:02, monarch_dodra пишет:
Bitch please!
[snip]
Denis, the above (as well as most of the message that follows) is
entirely inappropriate.
Can't agree. I think the complaining is reasonable
On 3/31/2013 1:02 PM, monarch_dodra wrote:
The second part of this post is about a specific (OSX related) bug. I don't like
drawing attention to it such as this, as I know we are all busy, but I think
this one is serious enough to try to push for its investigation:
On Tuesday, 2 April 2013 at 09:05:08 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 3/31/2013 1:02 PM, monarch_dodra wrote:
The second part of this post is about a specific (OSX related)
bug. I don't like
drawing attention to it such as this, as I know we are all
busy, but I think
this one is serious enough to
On Tue, 02 Apr 2013 11:20:26 +0400
Denis Shelomovskij verylonglogin@gmail.com wrote:
P.S.
Also, Nick, if you have time, could you show me, how do you suggest
to use D reliably in non toy Windows projects as you never said
anything against it?
Don't do incremental compilation. Stick to
I use OSX. I have about 20kloc of D code, and it all works :-) I
have occasionally seen wrong code bugs in the past, but I've
reported them all and from what I can remember they have all been
fixed.
I can repro your issue. The illegal instruction is a 'popq'
instruction called inside
On Sunday, 31 March 2013 at 20:02:40 UTC, monarch_dodra wrote:
This is a two part post.
First, I wanted to pol how many users out there were developing
under OSX? The threads seem to indicated users under windows or
Linux, but I've never heard of anybody under OSX. So who has or
is
On 2013-04-01 11:42, Paolo Invernizzi wrote:
Actually on OSX I'm using LDC, because simply I can't use objc bindings
with DMD (random stack corruptions), and I'm a little too under time
pressure to investigate the issue.
What kind of objc bindings are you using? Own implementation or some
On Monday, 1 April 2013 at 10:32:09 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-04-01 11:42, Paolo Invernizzi wrote:
Actually on OSX I'm using LDC, because simply I can't use objc
bindings
with DMD (random stack corruptions), and I'm a little too
under time
pressure to investigate the issue.
What
On 2013-04-01 15:27, Paolo Invernizzi wrote:
They are a simple declarations of the main objc functions and types made
by ourself: nothing really special.
Ok, I see.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
01.04.2013 0:02, monarch_dodra пишет:
This is a two part post.
The reason I'm worried about this bug is that the only condition that
seems to trigger it passing an object that has a destructor. I find this
is very bothersome, because it can happen with perfectly safe code, and
its observable
On 4/1/13 11:21 AM, Denis Shelomovskij wrote:
01.04.2013 0:02, monarch_dodra пишет:
This is a two part post.
The reason I'm worried about this bug is that the only condition that
seems to trigger it passing an object that has a destructor. I find this
is very bothersome, because it can happen
On Mon, 01 Apr 2013 11:50:22 -0400
Andrei Alexandrescu seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
On 4/1/13 11:21 AM, Denis Shelomovskij wrote:
01.04.2013 0:02, monarch_dodra пишет:
This is a two part post.
The reason I'm worried about this bug is that the only condition
that seems to
This is a two part post.
First, I wanted to pol how many users out there were developing
under OSX? The threads seem to indicated users under windows or
Linux, but I've never heard of anybody under OSX. So who has or
is developing under OSX? Anybody?
I also wanted to know if you had any
On 2013-03-31 22:02, monarch_dodra wrote:
This is a two part post.
First, I wanted to pol how many users out there were developing under
OSX? The threads seem to indicated users under windows or Linux, but
I've never heard of anybody under OSX. So who has or is developing under
OSX? Anybody?
On Sunday, 31 March 2013 at 20:02:40 UTC, monarch_dodra wrote:
This is a two part post.
First, I wanted to pol how many users out there were developing
under OSX? The threads seem to indicated users under windows or
Linux, but I've never heard of anybody under OSX. So who has or
is
22 matches
Mail list logo
