Re: Old Machines and XP for Linux(not really a D topic)

2014-02-28 Thread John Colvin
On Friday, 28 February 2014 at 04:31:01 UTC, Steve Teale wrote: I was in a discussion here recently about 64 bit and how much memory people had in their machines these days. A somewhat unrelated topic is that Microsoft are in the process of dumping XP. Now all those old desktop boxes with

Re: Old Machines and XP for Linux(not really a D topic)

2014-02-28 Thread Steve Teale
On Friday, 28 February 2014 at 08:07:12 UTC, John Colvin wrote: On Friday, 28 February 2014 at 04:31:01 UTC, Steve Teale wrote: I was in a discussion here recently about 64 bit and how much memory people had in their machines these days. A somewhat unrelated topic is that Microsoft are in the

Re: Old Machines and XP for Linux(not really a D topic)

2014-02-28 Thread John Colvin
On Friday, 28 February 2014 at 11:20:14 UTC, Steve Teale wrote: On Friday, 28 February 2014 at 08:07:12 UTC, John Colvin wrote: On Friday, 28 February 2014 at 04:31:01 UTC, Steve Teale wrote: I was in a discussion here recently about 64 bit and how much memory people had in their machines

Re: Old Machines and XP for Linux(not really a D topic)

2014-02-28 Thread Stanislav Blinov
On Friday, 28 February 2014 at 11:20:14 UTC, Steve Teale wrote: I used the term XP lookalike by accident. I should have said XP clone or replicate or something. The Linux kernel must be powerful enough these days to support complete replication of XP functionality ReactOS targets exactly

Re: Old Machines and XP for Linux(not really a D topic)

2014-02-28 Thread Steve Teale
On Friday, 28 February 2014 at 12:20:53 UTC, John Colvin wrote: My question would be: why bother? Why not just use linux? People who can't afford modern machines or expensive proprietary software is a market that linux caters for (almost) uniquely well already. John, Please see my answer

Re: Old Machines and XP for Linux(not really a D topic)

2014-02-28 Thread Steve Teale
On Friday, 28 February 2014 at 12:20:14 UTC, Stanislav Blinov wrote: If you're talking Linux, why not just use Linux? To people who can just about manage to use outdated software on XP, it's probably a big deal to switch to Linux. And is that outdated version of Quickbooks available to run

Re: Old Machines and XP for Linux(not really a D topic)

2014-02-28 Thread MattCoder
On Friday, 28 February 2014 at 18:04:44 UTC, Steve Teale wrote: I was being semi-sarcastic, since as far as I'm concerned, Windows could die tomorrow. What I said was that Microsoft might be doing themselves a favour in the long term if ... I understand your point but I don't see this

Re: Old Machines and XP for Linux(not really a D topic)

2014-02-28 Thread Stanislav Blinov
On Friday, 28 February 2014 at 18:04:44 UTC, Steve Teale wrote: To people who can just about manage to use outdated software on XP, it's probably a big deal to switch to Linux. That doesn't have anything to do with the OS. It's a mentality problem. And is that outdated version of

Re: Old Machines and XP for Linux(not really a D topic)

2014-02-28 Thread Steve Teale
On Friday, 28 February 2014 at 21:05:01 UTC, Stanislav Blinov wrote: On Friday, 28 February 2014 at 18:04:44 UTC, Steve Teale wrote: You keep repeating this as if no one in this NG understands what you're saying. Respectfully, I'll say that you are wrong. I know all too well what it is to

Old Machines and XP for Linux(not really a D topic)

2014-02-27 Thread Steve Teale
I was in a discussion here recently about 64 bit and how much memory people had in their machines these days. A somewhat unrelated topic is that Microsoft are in the process of dumping XP. Now all those old desktop boxes with only 500k of memory will increasingly migrate in containers to